Hey, I've decided to post only photos and do an experiment. I know that pictures are not enough to determine my type, but it can be interesting.
My pictures:http://imgur.com/a/X65WV
V.I. me - experiment
Hey, I've decided to post only photos and do an experiment. I know that pictures are not enough to determine my type, but it can be interesting.
My pictures:http://imgur.com/a/X65WV
Enfp or INTp
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
imma guess LII>xLI
xLI over LII. Does not seem Ne ego or Fe valuing for that matter.
Last edited by maniac; 06-17-2016 at 09:55 PM.
Fi/Te and likely logical. ILI is a stretch, SLI could it be as well as overall you give out a deltish vibe, but I don't like to solely VI because it's not very reliable.
My first impression is XLI
"In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is." - Yogi Berra
SLI or ILI probably
Just by picture impression I personally thought LII.I know that pictures are not enough to determine my type, but it can be interesting.
Im going to throw a guess out there and say LII. VIs ever so slightly similar to another another LII on here... if i can completely remember what he looks like.
mb IST*
Unrelated to this thread but what's your relationship to the character in your avatar @Isemia ?
Actually, you vaguely look like Alex from Modern family, who I guess is LII.
It is explained in third picture.Originally Posted by Within
Moreover, this is my favourite character from my childhood. I was looking up to him, he had his own imagination and he didn't worry about anything physical.
If he did not worry about anything physical, he'd been suppressed by hippopotamuses near him.
@Isemia: are you perhaps the kind of person who waits for ages to be noticed when sitting at the counter of a cafeteria? I'd say either Si-base or Si-mobilizing and a total absence of Fi or Fe, so either SLI or LII.
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
where do people see Ne?
In EIIs/LIIs, Ne is not a state but a process, and as such can be missing from a static image such as a photograph.
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
ok but Person said "You have a large degree of Ne valuing in your gaze."
I agree with you I do not see it either. No Ne gaze, no Ne-valuing gaze, whatever that may look like.
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
Ne is the function which gives a state - result. Other is Reinin's bs
I'm not into Reinin. Anyway, I was not using the word 'state' in the socionics meaning of the word. What is meant was simply the more or less natural facial expression we can perceive in Ne base types. Just imagine that this post also includes a number of Ne-base type photo's: Micheal J. Fox, Weird Al Yankovich, Albert Einstein etc.etc.etc.
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
delta NF. After reading some comments sure LII could work.
Last edited by Tigerfadder; 06-26-2016 at 01:29 PM.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
