Theres old and new pics and with different expressions.)
VI me and stuff
Theres old and new pics and with different expressions.
Last edited by maniac; 05-09-2016 at 09:18 PM.
Delta nf?
@Anglas oo never gotten that before
irrational. ethical something something. idk. Strongest inclination is to say xNFp.
Hi how goes it?
Delta NF imo, but just take with a grain of salt.
SEI, SLE, or SEE
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
IEE without a doubt.
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
I like you as IP>EP, these pictures point out the ethical side.
pics are bad material for typing. only videointerview is good
iei
She has a video. You must have missed it when you told her that last time.Originally Posted by Sol
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
pics bring to mind amber tamblyn for whatever reason.
why so sure?
lol! Now I know who you are. It seems I've typed you twice! Consistently, at that.Theres old and new pics and with different expressions.
ignore the expression in 2nd to last pic cause that doesn't even look like me.
sei came to mind for me.
ISTx. Orobably static>Dynamic. I think you look patently logical in the third photo especially.
Haha thats my resting bitch face
As SxE?
yes. I was leaning more towards SEE based on your video and previous info.
Tamblyn is ENFP. msnobody may to be NF
10 years of experience in Socionics. Period.
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
I never heard of Tamblyn, but I looked her up on google, and saw in a flash that you have made a good call.
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
You think i look ENFP in the 3rd pic too?
Well, I don't know about ENFP, but it's still ENFp, even with the make-up. Things like make-up and cosmetic surgery can make a person difficult to type, but your pictures are pretty obvious.
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
What xd im talking about my expression in that picture compared to the others.Things like make-up and cosmetic surgery can make a person difficult to type, but your pictures are pretty obvious.
It's a different expression alright. Is that relevant to this discussion?
What xd im talking about my expression in that picture compared to the others.
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
Yes. Since its my neutral expression and the other ones i alter my expression so it looks good and probably dont do them alot in everyday life.
I get it. But to me your expressions are irrelevant. In your particular case, your eyes tell the whole story. Same eyes regardless of the faces you are trying to make.
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
ok lol
or mAkE-Up
ENFP means 4 preferences which are compatible and are main typing method in MBT. Now after 10 years in Socionics you know there is no ENFp/eNfP/etc, but just ENFP.
Also typing only by photos is not good way to be sure in type.
^how not to VI
I do not agree: there is enough Forer Effect in the MBTI profiles for anyone to recognize themselves in too many profiles. As for photos: they often aren't enough, but with some people, such as the OP, they are more than sufficient.
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
Like I said in my previous post: with some people, such as the OP, things are very simple and straightforward.
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
Hotelambush thinks im SEE
which I disagree with but he's stubborn
his argument is that I argue with people on the internet
That is not my argument at all, which I've elaborated at length.
In any case, if we're talking about VI, you definitely do look like an SEE; there are multiple other female SEEs with similar expressions, including the "resting bitch face" as you have so eloquently described it. Some that come to mind are Taylor Swift, Paris Hilton, and user Allie from this very forum (she goes by a different name nowadays, which I've forgotten) whom I have also typed as SEE.
Cause only SEEs have resting bitch faces
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
