Males:
SEI:
ILE: 6'2"-6'6"
LII: 5'11"-6'1"
ESE: 5'7"-5'10"
IEI: 5'4"-5'7"
SLE: 5'10"-6'2"
LSI: 6'1"-6'2"
EIE: 5'8"-5'10"
ILI: 5'11"-6'0"
SEE: 6'0"
ESI: 5'11
LIE: 5'10"
SLI: 5'10"
IEE: 5'8"-5'9"
EII: 5'6"-5'8"
LSE: 6'2"
Males:
SEI:
ILE: 6'2"-6'6"
LII: 5'11"-6'1"
ESE: 5'7"-5'10"
IEI: 5'4"-5'7"
SLE: 5'10"-6'2"
LSI: 6'1"-6'2"
EIE: 5'8"-5'10"
ILI: 5'11"-6'0"
SEE: 6'0"
ESI: 5'11
LIE: 5'10"
SLI: 5'10"
IEE: 5'8"-5'9"
EII: 5'6"-5'8"
LSE: 6'2"
Last edited by suedehead; 05-05-2016 at 11:31 AM.
SLI - 185 santimetres
I suppose those estimates are built on stereotypes?
Because type has no influence on height itself whatsoever.
(I've probably known tall and short versions of almost every type by now.)
Same for specific facial features like big nose/small nose, thin lips/full lips etc.
Metric:
SEI
ILE: 188-200
LII: 180-187
ESE: 170-179
IEI: 163-172
SLE: 178-190
LSI: 186-190
EIE: 173-179
ILI: 180-184
SEE: 183-184
ESI: 182
LIE: 178-179
SLI: 178-179
IEE: 173-177
EII: 168-174
LSE: 188-190
Last edited by suedehead; 05-03-2016 at 08:52 AM.
My problem with this question is simply the fact I have known very tall and very short people of almost each type!
So, it is difficult for me to figure out the stereotypes, personally.
(Could also be a weak sensing thing – I do not "picture" the types in a concrete visual, height-specific way like that.)
I see ESI guys as very small (in all regards) and whiny, but that might have to do with the OP ^^
We can't all be Nordic trust fund kids refi.
Won't the types most represented by men be taller on average and vice-versa? Jung himself said women more commonly represent the IxE types so I'm a bit confused as to how ILEs are the tallest...
I'm free associating - just another one of my low IQ compulsions.
I do that too. Guess I got low IQ and low T.
http://yourfriendshouse.com/uncatego...-your-purpose/
Edit:
Heights of people I know well and pretty sure of their types.
IEI male - 5'8
IEI male - 5'8 1/2
EIE male 5'7 (lies and says he is 5'8/9)
EIE male - 5'9
SLE male - 5'10
SLE male - 6'0
ILI male - 6'1
ILI male - 5'11
SLI male - 5'10
LSE male - 5'9
Last edited by Aylen; 05-03-2016 at 06:49 PM. Reason: correction
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Err... What type are midgets?
I struggle with motivation, apathy and sticking to goals.
what i noticed (based on the people i know in real life):
IEI (females) are exceptionally short and EIEs (male + female) exceptionally tall.
of course, this doesn't apply to every representative of these types. i don't even know whether there is actually a pattern.
Women:
SEI: 4'10"-5'2"
ILE: 5'7"-5'8"
LII:
ESE: 5'4"-5'5"
IEI: 5'2"-5'4"
SLE: 5'6"
LSI: 5'6"-5'8"
EIE: 5'6"
ILI: 5'3"-5'4"
SEE:
ESI: 5'6"-5'8"
LIE: 5'9"-5'10"
SLI:
IEE: 5'4"
EII: 5'2"-5'4"
LSE:
Last edited by suedehead; 05-04-2016 at 07:36 PM.
Type and heights of females I know well enough to assign a type. Only 5 are blood related to me.
ESE 5'5 1/2 (could be 5'6 now) and 5'3
SEI 5'4
IEI 5'0
EIE 5'2
LSI 5'2
SLE 5'8, 5'6 and 5'5
ESI 5'7, 5'6, 5'4, 5'2 and 5'0
SEE 5'2
IEE 5'5 and 5'4
EII 4'11 1/2 and 5'3
LSE 5'7
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
there is no correlation
Seriously.. Factoring height into socionics?
Not that correlating seemingly unrelated topics is necessarily a bad thing, but this is getting ridiculous.