Results 1 to 27 of 27

Thread: Crappiness of mirror relations understated in socionics literature?

  1. #1
    Muddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    2,800
    Mentioned
    152 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default Crappiness of mirror relations understated in socionics literature?

    I've been reading up on intertype relations a bit recently and most of what I read seems to view these as moderately positive relations. Based on experience however I believe these to be quite shitty in spite of the types sharing the same quadra. I'll provide some simple, generalized examples so you can see what I mean:

    SLE breaking the rules then being reprimanded by LSI.
    EII criticizing IEE for teasing others in a somewhat offensive manner and IEE criticizing EII for over-seriousness.
    LSE criticizing SLI for laziness and apathy and SLI in turn criticizing LSE for restlessness.
    SEE criticizing ESI for living a turtled, sheltered, boxed up life and ESI criticizing SEE for playing power games and manipulating people.
    ESE criticizing SEI for hoarding things too much to themselves and SEI criticizing ESE for possessive control in other's lives.
    ILI criticizing the reckless risk taking of LIE and LIE criticizing ILI for passiveness.
    LII criticizing ILE for inappropriateness and ILE criticizing LII for lack of spontaneity.
    IEI criticizing EIE for disturbing the peace and traquility and EIE criticizing IEI for lack of involvement in the world.


    There may be some explanations for this. Mirror relations are the only relations besides conflict where the types have opposing temperaments AND opposing styles of cognition. I saw somewhere that described Mirrors relations as direct mutual supervision and I would agree with this.

    Thoughts?

  2. #2
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Spiritus Mundi
    TIM
    psyche 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    11,347
    Mentioned
    1005 Post(s)
    Tagged
    42 Thread(s)

    Default

    Hahah sort of. I am thinking of a conversation with one of my male EIE friends from the past, who I don't see anymore. [Not my EIE ex as it didn't go anything like that with him.]

    EIE: "Get up bitch, I am taking you to the beach. You look like a ghost"

    Me: "Nope, I'm good."

    EIE: "Nooo, you're pale and need some sun."

    Me: "I am allergic to the sun"

    EIE: "Fucking vampire!"

    Me: "Thank you."

    EIE: "I will be back in two hours. We are going shopping."

    Me: "That'll work."

    “My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.”​ —C.G. Jung
     
    YWIMW

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    230
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aylen View Post
    Hahah sort of. I am thinking of a conversation with one of my male EIE friends from the past, who I don't see anymore. [Not my EIE ex as it didn't go anything like that with him.]

    EIE: "Get up bitch, I am taking you to the beach. You look like a ghost"

    Me: "Nope, I'm good."

    EIE: "Nooo, you're pale and need some sun."

    Me: "I am allergic to the sun"

    EIE: "Fucking vampire!"

    Me: "Thank you."

    EIE: "I will be back in two hours. We are going shopping."

    Me: "That'll work."
    yes, all EIEs are this dude:

  4. #4
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Spiritus Mundi
    TIM
    psyche 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    11,347
    Mentioned
    1005 Post(s)
    Tagged
    42 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tonka View Post
    yes, all EIEs are this dude:


    Nooooo! Not my EIE bio-dad. He is all sweet and uplifting.

    My friend is flamboyantly gay and he calls everyone "bitch". I don't take it the wrong way from him. If someone else called me bitch I might not like it.

    “My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.”​ —C.G. Jung
     
    YWIMW

  5. #5
    tejing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    California
    TIM
    LII-H
    Posts
    166
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    In my experience mirror relations work quite well so long as they focus on ego-block stuff, however when circumstances force them to handle super-ego-block stuff together, things deteriorate quickly as each one's preferred way of handling those issues steps on the other's vulnerable function.
    Last edited by tejing; 04-14-2016 at 09:54 PM. Reason: typo
    Valued | Devalued
    < | < | Conscious
    < | < | Unconscious

  6. #6
    Poster Nutbag The Exception's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    my own personal bubble
    TIM
    LII-Ne
    Posts
    4,097
    Mentioned
    103 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tejing View Post
    In my experience mirror relations work quite well so long they focus on ego-block stuff, however when circumstances force them to handle super-ego-block stuff together, things deteriorate quickly as each one's preferred way of handling those issues steps on the other's vulnerable function.
    I think you're right. Most of the time mirror relations are good. I enjoy the company of ILEs and get along with them most of the time. Occasionally they can annoy me though because some have a tendency to offend other or take their joking too far (Fi PoLR).
    LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP



  7. #7
    Contra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    TIM
    ILI-Ni
    Posts
    1,404
    Mentioned
    57 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i dont know if i'd criticize an LIE for reckless risk taking. I think i'd encourage it in many cases.

  8. #8
    darya's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    TIM
    EIE-Ni 3w4 sx
    Posts
    2,833
    Mentioned
    256 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'd say mirror relations are one of the better ones. Mirrors are often good friends or end up in couples, from what I've observed. Definitely wouldn't describe them as shitty.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    230
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Muddytextures View Post
    I've been reading up on intertype relations a bit recently and most of what I read seems to view these as moderately positive relations. Based on experience however I believe these to be quite shitty in spite of the types sharing the same quadra. I'll provide some simple, generalized examples so you can see what I mean:

    IEI criticizing EIE for disturbing the peace and traquility and EIE criticizing IEI for lack of involvement in the world

    Thoughts?
    No. Disturbing the peace? SLEs are IEI duals for christ's sake. Lack of involvement? Sounds alright I guess. I tend to get a bit pissed at IEI passive manipulation but for the most part the relationship is fine. IEIs get annoyed at EIEs overtly trying to control them. Make for good friendships, but no real passion.

  10. #10
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Spiritus Mundi
    TIM
    psyche 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    11,347
    Mentioned
    1005 Post(s)
    Tagged
    42 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tonka View Post
    No. Disturbing the peace? SLEs are IEI duals for christ's sake. Lack of involvement? Sounds alright I guess. I tend to get a bit pissed at IEI passive manipulation but for the most part the relationship is fine. IEIs get annoyed at EIEs overtly trying to control them. Make for good friendships, but no real passion.
    I don't call them "partners in crime" for nothing. I think an E9 of any type would have more problem with someone disturbing their peace. I find too much peace and tranquility overrated and a bit boring after awhile.

    “My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.”​ —C.G. Jung
     
    YWIMW

  11. #11
    Rebelondeck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    1,929
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Muddytextures,

    I would agree that they are the least complementary as far as information processing is concerned. I wrote the following in 2010:

    http://www.socionics.com/articles/thestrength.html

    a.k.a. I/O

  12. #12
    Muddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    2,800
    Mentioned
    152 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tonka View Post
    No. Disturbing the peace? SLEs are IEI duals for christ's sake. Lack of involvement? Sounds alright I guess. I tend to get a bit pissed at IEI passive manipulation but for the most part the relationship is fine. IEIs get annoyed at EIEs overtly trying to control them. Make for good friendships, but no real passion.
    I didn't really know what to put for EIE and IEI as I don't have much personal experience with them but didn't want have them being the only one left out so I just put the best bullshit answer I could think of lol. There's a reason why it was last on the list.

  13. #13
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,952
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rebelondeck View Post
    Muddytextures,

    I would agree that they are the least complementary as far as information processing is concerned. I wrote the following in 2010:

    http://www.socionics.com/articles/thestrength.html

    a.k.a. I/O
    I agree that super ego relationship are easy to start. Both consider the other person kind and well intentioned
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  14. #14
    Seed my wickedness The Reality Denialist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Spontaneous Human Combustion
    TIM
    EIE-C-Ni ™
    Posts
    8,254
    Mentioned
    339 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    LII wants to see me acting as rational... and sometimes to add little bit of human perspective.
    One LII said: If you are not going to take action with your ideas, I will use them.
    Me: Just go ahead [like there is a finite amount of them]. There is no need to do something about it at this point.

    LII: What about ethical concerns?
    Me: I don't understand why it is wrong that two terminally ill adults want to hypothetically swap their brains... If it can save a life... hypothetically.
    MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
    Winning is for losers

     

    Sincerely yours,
    idiosyncratic type
    Life is a joke but do you have a life?

    Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org

  15. #15
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,952
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by unsuccessfull Alphamale View Post
    LII wants to see me acting as rational... and sometimes to add little bit of human perspective.
    One LII said: If you are not going to take action with your ideas, I will use them.
    Me: Just go ahead [like there is a finite amount of them]. There is no need to do something about it at this point.

    LII: What about ethical concerns?
    Me: I don't understand why it is wrong that two terminally ill adults want to hypothetically swap their brains... If it can save a life... hypothetically.
    Lol
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  16. #16
    Olimpia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Europe
    TIM
    So/Sx Introvert
    Posts
    7,961
    Mentioned
    717 Post(s)
    Tagged
    8 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by darya View Post
    I'd say mirror relations are one of the better ones. Mirrors are often good friends or end up in couples, from what I've observed. Definitely wouldn't describe them as shitty.
    I can concur with Mirror couples being fairly common. In my experience, especially people from the Gamma and Delta Quadras are frequently found having married their Mirror (primarily SEE-ESI, followed by IEE-EII).
    It might be a matter of Fi valuing similarity highly, including both people having Fi in their Ego/as their valued function.

    Having said that, I don't see Mirror being generally desirable for marriage. Both types are similar enough to have pretty similar weaknesses, but different enough to butt heads at times.
    Mirrors can be great for having fruitful discussions, but not as much for raising a family or finding someone to balance you out. Personally, I am also not attracted or interested in dating a Mirror type, and this may be partly because of the aforementioned reasons.

    All in all, Mirror is one of the better relations, but at the same time it can be lacking of that special "zing" of attraction, or that feeling of a "soulmate connection".
    Those aspects may develop over time with enough care, attention and attachment, but in comparison to other relations, there seems to remain some kind of a lack somehow.

    (Needless to say, Mirror partners can have difficulties with sustaining the relationship. Often they seemingly suddenly divorce or break-up, or have to keep a certain distance in order to not "blow up" on each other. I've seen several IEE-EII couples living in different apartments even, or having an "open relationship" to circumvent this issue.)
    New Youtube [x] Get Typed! [x]
    Celebs [x] Theory [x] Tumblr [x]

    *********** 21-04-19:
    "Looks like a mystic that just arrived to battle and staring out at the battle, ready to unleash"



  17. #17
    darya's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    TIM
    EIE-Ni 3w4 sx
    Posts
    2,833
    Mentioned
    256 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SisOfNight View Post
    I can concur with Mirror couples being fairly common. In my experience, especially people from the Gamma and Delta Quadras are frequently found having married their Mirror (primarily SEE-ESI, followed by IEE-EII).
    It might be a matter of Fi valuing similarity highly, including both people having Fi in their Ego/as their valued function.

    Having said that, I don't see Mirror being generally desirable for marriage. Both types are similar enough to have pretty similar weaknesses, but different enough to butt heads at times.
    Mirrors can be great for having fruitful discussions, but not as much for raising a family or finding someone to balance you out. Personally, I am also not attracted or interested in dating a Mirror type, and this may be partly because of the aforementioned reasons.

    All in all, Mirror is one of the better relations, but at the same time it can be lacking of that special "zing" of attraction, or that feeling of a "soulmate connection".
    Those aspects may develop over time with enough care, attention and attachment, but in comparison to other relations, there seems to remain some kind of a lack somehow.

    (Needless to say, Mirror partners can have difficulties with sustaining the relationship. Often they seemingly suddenly divorce or break-up, or have to keep a certain distance in order to not "blow up" on each other. I've seen several IEE-EII couples living in different apartments even, or having an "open relationship" to circumvent this issue.)
    IEE/EII couples do seem very common (and agree with Fi ego mirrors the most likely to end up in romantic relationships for some reason). I also think mirrors are usually a bad match for long-term romantic relationships, similarities usually bury them.

  18. #18
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    16,279
    Mentioned
    1555 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Contra View Post
    i dont know if i'd criticize an LIE for reckless risk taking. I think i'd encourage it in many cases.
    If you know an LIE who is taking risks, you'll probably end up sharing the wealth.

    I find ILI's make very good friends. Smart, insightful, funny, and great planners. I would never criticize an ILI for sitting back and planning, rather than doing. Their plans are usually insightful and very well thought-out, when they are not rushed into doing something that they haven't had time to consider. The ones I know are also very good doers, when they do decide to do something.

    I've only dated one female ILI. While I really liked how her mind worked, and we got along well and had a great time, ultimately, neither of us had the long-term-mate characteristics that the other was looking for.

    On the other hand, my SLI ex is my Socionics Supervisor, which is considered to be one of the worst types of interpersonal relationships, but because she was a strong Te-subtype, she looked much more like my Mirror than my Supervisor, and this probably made things much, much better than they would have been otherwise.

  19. #19

    Default

    mirror relations are pretty boring IME

  20. #20
    SongOfSapphire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    TIM
    IEE
    Posts
    517
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I have a couple of good friends who are EIIs, one male one female, fwiw...we get along well, usually doing things like hiking, going out to eat, etc. I don't think it's a bad relationship, though I wouldn't have wanted to be in a romantic relationship w an EII bc they generally feel too "soft" for me....

    In my experience, mirrors get a little annoyed sometimes w the lack of each other's proficiency in their own DS function and in the mirror's PoLR (which, while not valued explicitly, is still important). So from my perspective, EIIs don't bring the Si I need and are too weak in Se (I can make up for it to an extent but prefer not to), and from their perspective, I'm sure, I am woefully weak in Te and too lacking in the solid Ti which forces them to take care of it when they'd rather not.
    "In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is." - Yogi Berra

  21. #21
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,952
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sapphire View Post
    I have a couple of good friends who are EIIs, one male one female, fwiw...we get along well, usually doing things like hiking, going out to eat, etc. I don't think it's a bad relationship, though I wouldn't have wanted to be in a romantic relationship w an EII bc they generally feel too "soft" for me....

    In my experience, mirrors get a little annoyed sometimes w the lack of each other's proficiency in their own DS function and in the mirror's PoLR (which, while not valued explicitly, is still important). So from my perspective, EIIs don't bring the Si I need and are too weak in Se (I can make up for it to an extent but prefer not to), and from their perspective, I'm sure, I am woefully weak in Te and too lacking in the solid Ti which forces them to take care of it when they'd rather not.
    I love IEE and yes their extroverted social nature gets to me but when at home we do relax and find comfort in the home however I can like a neat environment and they can be messy (talking about the males); I love their attentive and affectionate nature though they can be overly attentive which I sometimes don't mind. I love my IEE girlfriends. One is going to build a giant Lego set with me. So involved and nice.
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  22. #22
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,952
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sapphire View Post
    I have a couple of good friends who are EIIs, one male one female, fwiw...we get along well, usually doing things like hiking, going out to eat, etc. I don't think it's a bad relationship, though I wouldn't have wanted to be in a romantic relationship w an EII bc they generally feel too "soft" for me....

    In my experience, mirrors get a little annoyed sometimes w the lack of each other's proficiency in their own DS function and in the mirror's PoLR (which, while not valued explicitly, is still important). So from my perspective, EIIs don't bring the Si I need and are too weak in Se (I can make up for it to an extent but prefer not to), and from their perspective, I'm sure, I am woefully weak in Te and too lacking in the solid Ti which forces them to take care of it when they'd rather not.
    Sapphire, I'm not bothered by people like SEE can be or get I'm not constantly moody as my moods are more even keel. So, I ooften find myself not having much to vent about with regards to people and relationships except when I'm explaining various behaviors on the forum, those are examples. In real life I love my relationships and hang around, support, and listen. I just don't accumulate negative feelings so I guess I don't have bad things to say. I'm content in most situations.
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  23. #23
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Muddytextures View Post
    LSE criticizing SLI for laziness and apathy and SLI in turn criticizing LSE for restlessness.
    I had friendly relations with SLI. There was no criticizing. We just had close interests and sympathy.
    Also SLI are not lazy and LSE are not restlessness. Descriptions of types are exaggerated to make easier understanding of types differences.

  24. #24
    hiatus
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    تخت نور
    Posts
    373
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    In my reading experience, most articles on all inter-type relations are negative. They all end up comparing the relation in question unfavorably to duality.

  25. #25
    Alomoes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    TIM
    LIE ENTj
    Posts
    843
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I've found that the only relation I've knowingly gone through is mirror. It went well enough. I'll summarize.

    ILI says hi to LIE
    Asks type, learns is mirror.
    ILI has nothing to say, just listens.
    LIE talks about economics.
    Question comes up that he can't answer.
    ILI starts talking, and he watches.

    This is just my one example of mirror type. I'm probably romanticizing it too much, but meh.

  26. #26
    summerprincess's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    US
    TIM
    IEI 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    553
    Mentioned
    45 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Not sure if this guy I know is LIE or EIE, but I'm leaning towards EIE.. so I guess we would be mirrors. I thought he was soooo cool and smart a few years ago and looked up to him a lot, I would get nervous around him and act really weird. He wasn't the nicest to me and kinda treated me like I was beneath him. I got over it and now a lot of the stuff he does and his outfits and stuff just make me cringe and the fact that I ever felt the way I did about him makes me laugh now. This seems kinda similar to what I've read in mirror descriptions

  27. #27
    Haikus niffer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    TIM
    SLE-H 8w9 SX
    Posts
    2,808
    Mentioned
    283 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    I've always needed a cushion of distance for things to stay healthy between me and LSIs. I mean, in the first place relationships are hard for me lol, so some distance is always inevitably needed by me. It seems like an optimal balance (from my perception anyway) is hard to strike sometimes, partly due to us both having weak ethical abilities while finding each other attractive, and partly due to unavoidable environmental factors (and this is pretty important as a beta and as an SLE). It also might have to do with subtype or individual differences. When LSIs and I take instant interest in one another and begin to interact vigorously from the beginning, things end up blowing up. But with those LSIs I've met where our relationship is slow to start and grows slowly over time with a weak simmer, our distant connection has been maintained.
    [Today 07:57 AM] Raver: Life is a ride that lasts very long, but still a ride. It is a dream that we have yet to awaken from.

    It's hard to find a love through every shade of grey.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •