--
Trying Typing Again! 40Q's, Pictures, Optional Video
--
Last edited by Nocturne; 11-28-2018 at 05:13 PM.
ESI sounds great
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
One vote for ESI then?Originally Posted by Maritsa
Anyone else?
Bump
inb4 Sol links us to his post in the VI thread no one cares about
I'm sorry, I don't tend to find these questionnaires as especially useful for determining a person's type (it is too easy for great importance to be placed on a value because a person has said they consider themselves "strong" or "weak" at it, for example: often, people claim to be weak at a value they are perhaps in reality are very good at): I've seen also a number of occasions where forum members have typed new members as opposite types to other suggestions, or what the person later decides.
I think IEI is as good a guess as any, based somewhat on the enneagram tritype you have assigned for yourself. I would consider it far more productive (and quicker) for you to take some Socionics tests: http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...ocionics-Tests
I added the video!
IP temperament. I also was into martial arts and riding horses. You are very relatable. It might be E4 sx/sp that I relate to most. I could see you as ILI or IEI but you have a softness that I don't see in ILI and I don't know any ILI 4s. I mentioned before you VI similar to @SisOfNight.
"if I like it who cares if..." <--
The video was very helpful in your case as I was inclined to agree with ESI until I watched it.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Another vote here. I've explained why before... in the other thread.
(And I've had a look at the video.)
Honestly, I find it a bit frustrating to see so many ESI E4s being mistyped as IEI.
So, I will take this typing to the grave, haha.
Life is too short to get frustrated over mistyping. Until there is a way to map the cognitive functions through something like MRI it is not going to be a science. I am not sure if it ever will be since it is kind of a fringe theory to start with. Ultimately she will have to decide for herself. The one thing that still has me thinking she could be ESI is that she doesn't have that "knowing" like other IEI tell me they have. Many of the self typed IEI here have changed types and moved on it seems. The ones still around I either do not know well enough or I agree with their type. I think she might have ever been typed Logical in her first thread.
@Nocturne I am going with a wait and see attitude for now. I think taking some of the quizzes can be helpful and Subt already linked you.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
To be honest, I'm here because over at PersonalityCafe I was typed ESE, which I strongly disagreed with. Caused quite the conflict. If I got ESE here, then I would be certain that perhaps I really am ESE.
PersonalityCafe is full of morons lol.
･ﾟ*✧ 𝓘 𝓌𝒾𝓁𝓁 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒶𝒸𝒸𝑒𝓅𝓉 𝒶 𝓁𝒾𝒻𝑒 𝓘 𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒 ✧*:･ﾟ
That's what all communities say about eachother haha
Reply With Quote
