A redundant greeting
Hello, I'm Nasq. ILI, 1w9 sp.
A friend of mine introduced me to socionics after she grew tired of the MBTI scene. So here I am, hoping to learn more about yet another personality system. I'm looking forward to absorbing your knowledge and observing you all from a semi-creepy distance.
and welcome.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Welcome
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
It's not redundant. It's your 1st sacrifice to socionics. Now you have +1 to karma and higher chance to correctly identify your type.
The more you post the faster we cross-reference your verbal patterns to assimilate a simulated persona into the hive-mind.
*cough* Hi! o/
Reason is a whore.
Hello, I am new too. How'd you get an avatar picture? My profile won't let me.
You might be able to now, if your account was greyed out before.Originally Posted by Jupiter
Thank you all for welcoming me.
lol hello to you as wellhello! I'm new here myself. I didn't want to start my own thread, though. I'm shySo I'm posting in your thread. Sorry. Hello
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Hey! No need to be sorry, I almost did the same thing.hello! I'm new here myself. I didn't want to start my own thread, though. I'm shy
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
