Originally Posted by
Hacim
I, Hacim, do declare the following notions pertaining to Jung-based typologies to be complete and utter bull doo-doo:
...That you need other people to determine your type for you.
...That most inter-type relationships are guaranteed to end in disaster.
...That logical types are incapable of having emotional attachments.
...That ethical types are incapable of independently making clear and unbiased decisions.
Henceforth, any forum-goer caught using one of the above premises as justification for a claim pertaining to any Jung-based typology shall be turned over to the Spanish Inquisition, because nobody expects a Spanish Inquisition!
But seriously, you can't just float through the theory of Socionics without taking your time to process what it actually says. Making up a system that works only for you is most likely solid proof that you're misguided in some way. Claims should be supported with reason relevant to the theory, not supported by supposed intra-type facial structure correlations or "vibes" that people "just give off".