Judge people. It's actually really simple.
I would say that ethically you are still supposed to act as if you have unilateral responsibility; but simultaneously you have to be able to see the other as a fully autonomous, free, aware person.
Medicalizing social problems has the additional benefit of rendering society not responsible for those social ills. If it’s a disease, it’s nobody’s fault. Yay empiricism.
Put a sign outside your yard about how obama is the anti-christ and hang up a confederate flag.
I'm democratic, and just resolve it by being completely uninterested.
Your thoughts are almost entirely contingent on your specific experience. Why be so attached to them?
Why do you want to become more aristocratic? Why do you think it would benefit you?
EII - INTj - Dostoyevsky -
No, it's not a typo!
Last edited by SongOfSapphire; 02-01-2016 at 04:43 PM.
"In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is." - Yogi Berra