I was asked to answer this, but it's really difficult because I don't seek Ti so I don't spend so much time on it Also people may look for different things despite being Ti seeking.
If you are Ti seeking, and ESE this would be how I explain it,
Te will give you an explanation of how to use something, wheres Ti will give you an explanation of why something works.
Take for instance a clock, a Te will be inclined to give you information on which button to press, how long to press it, how to access such and such a feature on such and such a model. Complicated information but you learn how to work it.
Ti will give you an overview of how the clock works, so then you have an understanding of the theory of clocks, and using that theory, you would feel happier because you could apply that theory to any clock.
Depending on your perspective, one is more complicated and one is more simple. Te being dynamic will explain to how the best course of action for a particular thing, of course situations are always in flow so that explanation can vary, but it will get you the results you desire at that particular time. Ti will give you a theory that you should be able to apply to any of that type of situation, it's static. Of course the latter may seem simpler, and it can be reassuring to Ti seeking types, but the thing is things are always changing so the application of the theory may not always be satisfactory, so you look to have this refined and refined, Ti.
Same thing with any given situation. That's the best I can do.