Originally Posted by
Raver
It is very important to know on whether you believe the rest of the planets in the solar system are round or not to understand where you're coming from and to see if there's consistency and logic in what you're claiming.
Not sure why still. Sorry, I am not following your thinking. Not blaming that on you! I think I am freezing up. Too many demands on this thread on my vulnerable function. I need to manage these demands or I will literally type all night. I started this thread as a conversation starter, NOT so I could be a pontificater for a scientific theory I had only just learned the existence of.
Honestly you really don't want me to be the one to tell you what I think FET says on planets. If I find a fact I find intriguing, I post it here, but do you want me to explain what the theory says on various topics? I honestly think not.
So on this thread I am not volunteering to be the one to summarize and teach the fine points of flat earth theory. My posts will be way too long for the average person to want to read, and that's because I have to use my vulnerable function to do it. Its already happened all over this thread. People dash off a brief sentence to me on this thread, a question or some scoffing, and hit send and then they go about their day, or back to their online games. Then I see it and there goes a sizable chunk of my day as I try to answer it. And I answer the sentence just like this [from here]:
IEEs tend to have a difficult time describing a concept or system in a manner in which the essential facts are all that is needed to understand or describe it. The IEE's focus in describing a concept or system is in how they themselves came to understand and see what they are describing. If an IEE is asked to describe or explain something, their natural tendency is to describe the pieces of the concept, system or idea that are related to the subject as a foundation before explaining the actual concept itself. The IEE will often describe details or aspects of a system that are unnecessary to the understanding of the system's properties, but the IEE views these details as essential functions of a sequential system (as opposed to describing the concept or system and only the concept or system as an independent entity). In other words, even if a detail is deemed outside of the IEE as extraneous, the IEE that is describing it will see it as a vital and significant part of a chain in order to paint the full, "proper" picture of the system the IEE wants to describe. An IEE will tend to start off explanations with a tremendous amount of detail, energy and patience and will move towards a more general explanation as they tire out (if they tire out). If something in the IEE's chain is broken or questioned, the description (in the IEE's mind) halts or falls apart.
When an IEE understands a logical concept or system, they are much better at describing anecdotal experiences with the concept or system that help to illustrate the concept or system. They would prefer to do this rather than describing the concept or system as described in the previous paragraph -- describe the essential facts of a concept or system...
[continues with more all about IEE and Ti, in the source linked above]
Yup. That's exactly what I do. I have demonstrated my eptitude for the above-explained method all over this board. Many people read it, and conclude: "I need a nap", or, "Eliza's a bore." But not really! I am just an IEE, using my Ti function in the best way I know how...
(You see there is a Holographic-Panoramic thinker in every quadra. It starts our heartily in the first quadra with Alpha's LII putting venerable use to Ti in the first function. But by the time you get to the last quadra, what you are down to is someone who uses it with Ti in vulnerable function - and this is the result.).
My husband, when I go into this mode - which can happen - he is an "asker" - will listen to the whole thing with patience (and a bit of effort). But what really makes him awesome gold is that he understands it all, and he remembers what I said.
So you see I am not endeavoring to add to the online FET knowledge-base. And please know that I am not answering your planet questions out of real charity to YOU. Because I just don't know how to present what I learned without also tying in what is said in the pertinent connected issues, like, the "firmament above", or, the prolific evidence of NASA space travel hoaxes, and lots more. Believe me - any question that pops in your head concerning how FET explains anything has already been asked by someone else, and so you can quickly find an article or a brief video for any part of FET explanations you have curiosity for. Those 1-5 minute videos I am sure you will find to be a much better use of your time than the sort of explanations I generate on a key board, powered by my 4th function....
___________
P.S. That was a lot of typing and time. But hopefully I will manage questions that request my knowledge with "Please look at post #788 on page 20..."