Not sure if I've seen this one on here:
http://nsi.sociotest.net/SOLTI-160eng.html
Longer test, it gives pretty detailed results.
Another Test
Not sure if I've seen this one on here:
http://nsi.sociotest.net/SOLTI-160eng.html
Longer test, it gives pretty detailed results.
Oh they got it translated, good.
The original version has got over 700 questions though.
I answered 3 for quite a few questions.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
ILI.
socioreport.PNG
Interesting that I score as rational yet still ILI. My Ti score was also much higher than my Te score. Strange.
Last edited by Attis; 12-16-2015 at 11:06 PM. Reason: Strange
Took it awhile back, EIE was the highest, IEI the next. SEI the lowest.
ILI
Attachment 6805
Attachment 6806
Like @Ellyan I chose the middle option 3 for quite a few answers.
Oh no husband and I came out as conflictors in this test!
Attachment 6819
Attachment 6820
Last edited by Hays; 12-17-2015 at 09:30 PM.
I got SLE, LSI in second place
LSI-Se 836 Sp/Sx
Nothing too surprising, I suppose.
i got sle in first place, eii in last place, lie in second place.
curiously i got really high on centralist which i hadn't heard of before, and very low on sensing. i also got creepy high on extroversion for some reason.
Edit: I'm stupid. peripheral vs centralist is ne/si vs ni/seOriginally Posted by Satan
Last edited by ouronis; 12-17-2015 at 02:34 AM.
I got LIE, with much less Ni than most LIE's. Also extremely extroverted, no surprise there.
Like Satan, I scored high on central, whatever that is. But I also scored as being static, rather than dynamic, which is strange because I see everything as being in motion. Maybe this was a result of a couple of the questions being unclear to me.
I also scored very high on Se, which is probably why the test said I was unusually SEE-like, and five times more like an SLE than the average LIE. This might account for my visceral attraction to IEI's. Too bad my Te hurts them. Guess I'm stuck with ESI's.
Adam's Extended Socionics test results - pg 1 of 2.jpgAdam's Extended Socionics test results - pg 2 of 2.jpg
Got ILI...then LII...then IEI.
good bye
IEE, with IEI as a close second.
2.
Good find.
(I didn't like how the IMs seemed to be put into groups, as it made it harder for me...it would have been better if they were mixed up I think. I found the first half or so of the questions more difficult to answer than the second half possibly for this reason)
EII
Hurts? In what way do you find it hurts them?Too bad my Te hurts them. Guess I'm stuck with ESI's.
It's not that dramatic for me. I don't find Te painful, just irritating, like dealing with tax stuff or banking "correctly", as in how I was taught. I don't balance my books or even check banking for months at a time but I have my own system that works. Plus I have most of my bills on autopay and get low balance notifications when I need to cut back on expenses or add funds. Much of my life is automated at this point so I get the most out of the time I have left on earth. This is a good time period for the Te polr and I think it is just going to get easier.
It was most irritating when I was still in school but in the real world I have come to accept myself as I am so if others don't like it they can kick rocks.Empirical data does not sway me. I am not bad at fact checking if I have to but don't usually find it necessary unless it is going to cost me, in the long run, if I don't do my research. It can be too time consuming when I have a good sense of how things will go. My ways baffled and annoyed my ILI stepdad when I was younger but I have adapted to changes in tech quickly plus I use some of the tricks he taught me.
It's actually easy to dismiss someone else's Te in favor of what I KNOW. Maybe I have become a bit of a know it all like him but not as in your face with it. Sometimes I speak with such confidence in what I am saying that people believe me even when I have some underlying doubts to the accuracy. ILI sometimes will call me on that.I think that it hurts Te users more than it hurts me when I dismiss their efforts to correct my knowledge in some way. Least painful polr there is. I would not switch polrs with anyone.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Not too bad. I'm some kind of ethical monster.
Ouronis said it's Ne/Si vs Ni/Se, I wouldn't put too much stock into reinin dicotomies on their own anyways.
Can anyone who is good at reading these charts tell me if I am lying? I tried to analyze it myself (rant, below) but basically made it worse.
Individualist/ Collectivist is Democratic/ Aristocratic.
Your results look good to me.
I faintly remember doing this. But on Russian with the help of both the common sense and GTR. Let's see what it gives me now.
MMPI has like 576 questions AND it detects if you lie / are unaware of something about yourself. To date I haven't really seen better psych. test.
Right, this thinks I am alpha SiFe type(whichever really):
(it won't allow me to do it like that)
The order went SEI ~ ESE > ESI ~ IEE > the rest >> ILI and LIE
You are talking about the first version. The one I filled out had around 750 questions.
After reading your post I searched for the test and found MMPI-2 but I am not sure how to read it. Here is a screenshot of the beginning of the results. I am not sure if my answers were consistent or not. I also got a 1 raw score for lie. Does that mean I admitted to a lie? I didn't intentionally lie on any of it but it was difficult to answer many of the questions conclusively the way they were phrased. I could answer to one phrasing true but asked another way seemed more false. I guess this is why it is only useful and valid in the hands of trained professionals. I think a test like this is good if you are having a dialogue with a professional and they can help clarify when you are unsure. Of course all tests like this will mark me high on schizophrenia unless I am given an opportunity to clarify my own answers and explain how these things are more intuitive and not crazy. I think it is suggesting I am a hypochondriac but I'm not. I am just very sensitive to certain things.
Last edited by Aylen; 12-18-2015 at 08:33 PM.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
anything wich uses Reinin's traits is bad
It's not exactly perfect.
Got LSI.
Ti, Te, Se as the strongest IEs. Load more Se than for the average LSI, lol
IEI with suprisingly high Ne, IEE as a second possibility and EII as 3rd.
Screenshot (323).png
Screenshot (326).png
Screenshot (327).png
My Se is off the charts!
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
What I find interesting is that these charts show how most Reinins beyond the jungian dichotomies are useless.
Most of them are hardly significantly apart from middle. Both for the actual test results and for the averages.
The only one that's significant for me is reasonable (peripheral) >> decisive (central).
It's kind of weird that I score slightly higher on ethical than logical according to dichotomies, yet it says my leading type is LII.
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
Because it takes into account more points than just that one. That's why it's a more refined evaluation than most tests, it seems.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
