Results 1 to 30 of 30

Thread: Model G

  1. #1
    Contra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    TIM
    ILI-Ni
    Posts
    1,405
    Mentioned
    55 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Model G

    https://www.facebook.com/ModelGulenko/?fref=photo

    Just found this model recently. It looks pretty interesting/useful. Does anyone know anymore about it? Is this something that is becoming more commonly used?

    Probably can't read it, but you get an idea. If you want to read it then you need to click the link.

  2. #2
    Haikus Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    22,740
    Mentioned
    531 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    I.enjoy your posts because you write and sound so much like another ILI forum member EyeSeeCold who I miss

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    2,230
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    It's not considered part of Socionics. With it, Gulenko effectively left Socionics and called Model A "classical socionics." It's effectively a version of Model B by someone who couldn't process Model B.

  4. #4
    Contra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    TIM
    ILI-Ni
    Posts
    1,405
    Mentioned
    55 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeremy8419 View Post
    It's effectively a version of Model B by someone who couldn't process Model B.
    How is this? Is it more simplified than model B?

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    2,230
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Contra View Post
    How is this? Is it more simplified than model B?
    No, it's a more complicated way to try and solve what Model B already did, which is Libido (energy). I had looked through it previously and was confused by how Gulenko could have missed such. In MBTI, the functional stacking shows what Model B shows, except it only shows the Libido flow. Model A did not include Libido, whereas MBTI did not include information. Model B reconciled the two into a single model. Gulenko is trying to holograph, that is, turn it inside out, Model A to see the opposite side presented by MBTI and how they connect. He's just trying to make Model B and doesn't realize it.

  6. #6
    ouronis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    TIM
    &*self
    Posts
    867
    Mentioned
    43 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeremy8419 View Post
    No, it's a more complicated way to try and solve what Model B already did, which is Libido (energy). I had looked through it previously and was confused by how Gulenko could have missed such. In MBTI, the functional stacking shows what Model B shows, except it only shows the Libido flow. Model A did not include Libido, whereas MBTI did not include information. Model B reconciled the two into a single model. Gulenko is trying to holograph, that is, turn it inside out, Model A to see the opposite side presented by MBTI and how they connect. He's just trying to make Model B and doesn't realize it.
    Curious, where have you seen him say he cares about mbti? I'd want to read.
    salmon

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    2,230
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    He's made statements regarding correlations between Socionics and MBTI, and between Socionics and Big 5. Also, that picture has MBTI in it, and he references such things in some of his videos. I don't have references, but you may be able to troll through that Facebook page. He's purportedly a believer in J/P switch for conversion. For big 5, he places openness as intuition, agreeableness as feeling, conscientiousness as rationality, and extroversion is obvious. MBTI/Big5 studies show conscientiousness is Judging

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Looks interesting....

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    2,230
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    It may be a better model than Model B for understanding things for some personality types. Model B was made by Bukalov who is ILE and in my supervision ring, so I understand him easiest

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    5,099
    Mentioned
    385 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Contra View Post
    Is this something that is becoming more commonly used?
    No. One from a pile of Gulenko's strange hypotheses.
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  11. #11
    Moderator Reficulris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    2,041
    Mentioned
    188 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I remember my time as stoned and chronically depressed teenager. When I would be active I'd make models like this, with nice arrows and abreviations. Sometimes I even believed it meant something.

    The above is to say that the facebook page above doesn't look like one from a professional adult but more a deluded teenager. One of the reasons I have troubles with Socionics; the marketing and product development is garbage.

    Still waiting for that socionics for dummies book

  12. #12
    Poster Nutbag The Exception's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    my own personal bubble
    TIM
    LII-Ne
    Posts
    4,108
    Mentioned
    94 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP



  13. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    2,230
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Reficulris View Post
    I remember my time as stoned and chronically depressed teenager. When I would be active I'd make models like this, with nice arrows and abreviations. Sometimes I even believed it meant something.

    The above is to say that the facebook page above doesn't look like one from a professional adult but more a deluded teenager. One of the reasons I have troubles with Socionics; the marketing and product development is garbage.

    Still waiting for that socionics for dummies book
    It's called "Relationships for Dummies," but it's only ever read by people who don't want relationships lol

  14. #14
    silke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    TIM
    Ni-IEI sx/sp
    Posts
    3,796
    Mentioned
    317 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Contra View Post
    https://www.facebook.com/ModelGulenko/?fref=photo

    Just found this model recently. It looks pretty interesting/useful. Does anyone know anymore about it? Is this something that is becoming more commonly used?
    I've cursorily browsed a few Model G discussions on Russian-speaking websites and forums. Turns out that Model "G" was proposed by Gulenko back in 1995, so it is something that is making a re-entry from many years ago. It's an attempt to further reformat and improve Model "A" to encompass energy metabolism along with information metabolism, as well as account for some intertype relationship interpretation gaps (e.g. what makes dual relationships not as common as would be predicted on basis of Model A alone).

    I'm guessing Gulenko is interested in tying in some of the theoretical aspects of socionics to research in cognitive science and psychology that has been conducted in the West up to date. Hence his intertest in Dario Nardi's work and resurrection of his old energo-model. As most of the people interested in the development of socionics are aware of the current shortcomings of Model A as well as of futility of proceeding further without some experimental results.

  15. #15
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    2,230
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Model B already has Energy, though lol

  16. #16
    Word Definition Warrior – WDW Troll Nr 007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    dispersed into the cosmos
    TIM
    H-ILE-Ne 7w6-2w1-1w9
    Posts
    1,966
    Mentioned
    66 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I have hard time to see it as new model. Alternative interpretation of Model A with different words. It is more like a fork taking into a consideration on how many ways Model A is interpreted. Partially it gives impression of going bit deeper but at the expense of IE interplay within a person. Creative vs demonstrative is bit hazy.

  17. #17
    Word Definition Warrior – WDW Troll Nr 007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    dispersed into the cosmos
    TIM
    H-ILE-Ne 7w6-2w1-1w9
    Posts
    1,966
    Mentioned
    66 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Reficulris View Post
    I remember my time as stoned and chronically depressed teenager. When I would be active I'd make models like this, with nice arrows and abreviations. Sometimes I even believed it meant something.

    The above is to say that the facebook page above doesn't look like one from a professional adult but more a deluded teenager. One of the reasons I have troubles with Socionics; the marketing and product development is garbage.
    Hypothesis and representation in progress not a finished product. It is pretty weird how much I can put time on polishing things and never finish the whole project. Those countless hours I put in use when I wrote organic molecules with LaTeX syntax.... (yes, I'm insane)

  18. #18
    Soupman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Grand Britain
    TIM
    Dyslexic 17
    Posts
    330
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by silke View Post
    I've cursorily browsed a few Model G discussions on Russian-speaking websites and forums. Turns out that Model "G" was proposed by Gulenko back in 1995, so it is something that is making a re-entry from many years ago. It's an attempt to further reformat and improve Model "A" to encompass energy metabolism along with information metabolism, as well as account for some intertype relationship interpretation gaps (e.g. what makes dual relationships not as common as would be predicted on basis of Model A alone).

    I'm guessing Gulenko is interested in tying in some of the theoretical aspects of socionics to research in cognitive science and psychology that has been conducted in the West up to date. Hence his intertest in Dario Nardi's work and resurrection of his old energo-model. As most of the people interested in the development of socionics are aware of the current shortcomings of Model A as well as of futility of proceeding further without some experimental results.
    What's your DCNH subtype?

  19. #19
    Don't forget the the thehotelambush's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    6,625
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    It seems to me that Model G is based on Gulenko's extensive experience with the types, and it seems generally more based on reality than Model B. The interpretation of +/- is also a lot more intuitive, although oversimplified. I use the same way of assigning signs because it assigns the same signs to benefit/supervision rings. It encapsulates the idea of "information flow", which Model B does not. edit: I take this back, Model B has this concept too. However, neither G nor B give a good operationalization of this concept, IMO.

    However, some of the specific definitions of signed IM elements that Gulenko uses seem like they could be improved, like +Si = maximizing comfort and -Si = minimizing discomfort, or -Fe = negative emotion and +Fe = positive emotion. I have presented on my website what I believe to be a more coherent set of definitions, although they are still a work in progress. The signs help to explain the relationships between the elements:

    https://wholesocionics.herokuapp.com...low-in-Model-A
    https://wholesocionics.herokuapp.com...ts-in-Model-A2
    Last edited by thehotelambush; 06-03-2016 at 08:25 AM.

  20. #20
    Tigerfadder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    926
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by silke View Post
    I've cursorily browsed a few Model G discussions on Russian-speaking websites and forums. Turns out that Model "G" was proposed by Gulenko back in 1995, so it is something that is making a re-entry from many years ago. It's an attempt to further reformat and improve Model "A" to encompass energy metabolism along with information metabolism, as well as account for some intertype relationship interpretation gaps (e.g. what makes dual relationships not as common as would be predicted on basis of Model A alone).

    I'm guessing Gulenko is interested in tying in some of the theoretical aspects of socionics to research in cognitive science and psychology that has been conducted in the West up to date. Hence his intertest in Dario Nardi's work and resurrection of his old energo-model. As most of the people interested in the development of socionics are aware of the current shortcomings of Model A as well as of futility of proceeding further without some experimental results.
    How does it account for dual relationships not being common as they should be in Model A?

  21. #21
    Ben Vaserlan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    England
    TIM
    TiNx
    Posts
    14
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    NiTx Model G will be released soon.
    My eponymous typology channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/Vaserlan/featured

  22. #22
    Ben Vaserlan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    England
    TIM
    TiNx
    Posts
    14
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chips and underwear View Post
    I call Model A "Model 80s".
    My eponymous typology channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/Vaserlan/featured

  23. #23
    Ben Vaserlan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    England
    TIM
    TiNx
    Posts
    14
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Contra View Post
    https://www.facebook.com/ModelGulenko/?fref=photo

    Just found this model recently. It looks pretty interesting/useful. Does anyone know anymore about it? Is this something that is becoming more commonly used?

    Probably can't read it, but you get an idea. If you want to read it then you need to click the link.
    Here is the Model G playlist on my channel starting with the hangout where Dr G explains it. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?lis..._wsPXgs20YsWBT
    My eponymous typology channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/Vaserlan/featured

  24. #24
    Ben Vaserlan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    England
    TIM
    TiNx
    Posts
    14
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeremy8419 View Post
    He's made statements regarding correlations between Socionics and MBTI, and between Socionics and Big 5. Also, that picture has MBTI in it, and he references such things in some of his videos. I don't have references, but you may be able to troll through that Facebook page. He's purportedly a believer in J/P switch for conversion. For big 5, he places openness as intuition, agreeableness as feeling, conscientiousness as rationality, and extroversion is obvious. MBTI/Big5 studies show conscientiousness is Judging
    With regard to my facebook page, I am a believer in the J/P conversion between Keirsey and all SHS types except FiSi Guardian, TiSi Inspector, SiTi Master.
    My eponymous typology channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/Vaserlan/featured

  25. #25
    Ben Vaserlan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    England
    TIM
    TiNx
    Posts
    14
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Reficulris View Post
    I remember my time as stoned and chronically depressed teenager. When I would be active I'd make models like this, with nice arrows and abreviations. Sometimes I even believed it meant something.

    The above is to say that the facebook page above doesn't look like one from a professional adult but more a deluded teenager. One of the reasons I have troubles with Socionics; the marketing and product development is garbage.

    Still waiting for that socionics for dummies book
    This deluded teenager says 'thanks'.
    My eponymous typology channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/Vaserlan/featured

  26. #26
    Ben Vaserlan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    England
    TIM
    TiNx
    Posts
    14
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by silke View Post
    I've cursorily browsed a few Model G discussions on Russian-speaking websites and forums. Turns out that Model "G" was proposed by Gulenko back in 1995, so it is something that is making a re-entry from many years ago. It's an attempt to further reformat and improve Model "A" to encompass energy metabolism along with information metabolism, as well as account for some intertype relationship interpretation gaps (e.g. what makes dual relationships not as common as would be predicted on basis of Model A alone).

    I'm guessing Gulenko is interested in tying in some of the theoretical aspects of socionics to research in cognitive science and psychology that has been conducted in the West up to date. Hence his intertest in Dario Nardi's work and resurrection of his old energo-model. As most of the people interested in the development of socionics are aware of the current shortcomings of Model A as well as of futility of proceeding further without some experimental results.
    Dr G and Dario Nardi are in nearly all of the hangouts together in this playlist. The interview is I going thru Model G with Dario without Viktor. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHJD...ckW9ZG6RHTJ7dy Dario has written a paper called the "6th Function" which was about the Gulenko Creative Function eg Ni in Carl Jung (LII). Dario believes it's a Jungian Function which can be developed to be very strong. This is explained in the first video in that playlist.
    My eponymous typology channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/Vaserlan/featured

  27. #27
    Ben Vaserlan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    England
    TIM
    TiNx
    Posts
    14
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tigerfadder View Post
    How does it account for dual relationships not being common as they should be in Model A?
    The lower incidence of dualisation is more to do with incompatible DCNH subtypes. See the three DCNH hangouts I did with Dr G in this playlist. The hangouts are in reverse order. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cy2R...DjAODE&index=5
    My eponymous typology channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/Vaserlan/featured

  28. #28
    Tigerfadder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    926
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ben Vaserlan View Post
    Dr G and Dario Nardi are in nearly all of the hangouts together in this playlist. The interview is I going thru Model G with Dario without Viktor. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHJD...ckW9ZG6RHTJ7dy Dario has written a paper called the "6th Function" which was about the Gulenko Creative Function eg Ni in Carl Jung (LII). Dario believes it's a Jungian Function which can be developed to be very strong. This is explained in the first video in that playlist.
    I translate this as if you keep in focus your demonstrative element from model A you will eventually be very good at it and it become a strength of yours.

  29. #29
    Ben Vaserlan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    England
    TIM
    TiNx
    Posts
    14
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Some will just be naturally stronger at their Demonstrative Model A Element. Subtype will help. It's gonna be harder for a TiNx Creative subtype (with accentuated Ne) to be as well focussed as a Harmonising subtype is.
    My eponymous typology channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/Vaserlan/featured

  30. #30
    Zero's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    My room
    TIM
    LIE
    Posts
    501
    Mentioned
    34 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    It's really disappointing that there aren't better quality talks about it and victor Gluenko doesn't speak English, makes the videos very hard to watch. Half of it is spoken in russian, I wonder how many people have enough time to waste on that.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •