Hello,
I remember reading somewhere that the inventor of socionics tried to improve her theory by studying the MBTI. This is a fine idea, but I wish she were still alive, because I could suggest an even better theory to study: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holland_Codes. Actually, it's not exactly the codes themselves that are good, but a book based on them - "CareerCode": http://www.amazon.com/CareerCode-Kno...ds=Career+Code. Why do I say this? First, when I opened the book, what did I see: a huge overlap with socionics. Take, for instance, the names of the types. Off the top of my head, here are some types that have not just similar, but exactly the same names:
- "Inspector"
- "Critic"
- "Director"
- "Ambassador"
- "Analyst"
- "Idealist"
- etc.
On top of this, if you read the descriptions, the information elements jump off the page - would it surprise you, for instance, that the "Analyst" is precise? (Which I am not, by the way - "Scholar"...) Further, even the other types that don't share exact names have similar names and descriptions (e.g., "Innovator" or "Sergeant" (i.e., "Inventor" and "Commander")). What does this mean? The fact that both theories share such similarities would be a sign that both are onto something - otherwise, why would the types they are describing be so close? (Are they both completely wrong?!)
Anyway, what did I learn from this book? First, have you noticed that there seem to be more than two logical functions? For instance, why are some "Ti-egos" scientific, while others are precise? Or some Te-egos precise instead, and some enterprising? The answer the book gives is that there are three logical functions: 1) "Investigative" - logical/scientific, 2) "Conventional" - i.e., precise, and 3) "Enterprising" - close to traditional notions of business logic. Therefore, this answered several questions I personally had about socionics. For instance, why am I "Ti", and yet not precise at all?.. On the other hand, if I'm not Ti, why do I show no interest in or talent for business? This book made it clear that precision, business skill, and logical aptitude are three different traits (sometimes they go together, but not all the time...)
Now, it's clear that the book is good, and I strongly recommend it for both expanding your understanding of personality and searching for a career (as career is the main focus of the book...). However, there are some gaps in it that socionics does a better job with. For instance, socionics has two emotional functions, while CareerCode only has one - "Social". Also, the sensing and intuitive traits seem to be left by the wayside. In any event, if you want to enrich your understanding of socionics, I strongly suggest reading this book (or, in the very least, studying Holland's Career Code...)
Jason