.
.
.
Last edited by theticalanti; 02-29-2016 at 12:55 AM.
Also there may be types of humans who were killed or extinct.. I'll bookmark it to read
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I just wrote to them
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Gee, this is about genes, alzheimer and such, not about silly signs and letter soup.Originally Posted by Willyum Take4
Also, you changed the two-three most important words so as to achieve maximum effect. So, well done!
The study has nothing to do with personality/cognitive differences between people but focuses on the gene expressions that make a human brain human, and not for example a mouse's. As the article suggests, it's helpful to know how a rat's brain differs from a human brain so those differences can be taken into account when testing on rats any brain related medication possibilities intended for humans.
An example not in those articles but related to research I've been doing on evolution...
One major difference between a chimpanzee brain and a human brain is the number of pathways to get energy to the brain vs to the bones. In chimps, they have more energy pathways to support the skeletal-muscular system than to support the brain, while humans have significantly more energy pathways to support the brain than to support the skeletal-muscular system. This difference, of course, is reflected in genetic differences between humans and chimpanzees. I don't recall the next part too well, but it had something to do with what would happen to a fetus/child who had less of those pathways than a normal human brain, and the severe cognitive and social deficits it would imply, even if there were still more pathways than a chimp's. It also suggested implications of these difference if using chimps to test medications intended for humans.
This is the kind of stuff that the Allen Institute is studying, not the differences between normal/healthy human brains.
IEE 649 sx/sp cp
There may be different traits to form 32 types besides Jung's functions.
After they'll describe those types, then the situation will be more clear.
I just want them to verify what I've always know. That way it's indispensable and no one will argue with me when I types them
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
One study that was done in an archeological burial site revealed 8 skull mythologies.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
The only way they will discover behavior similarity is through medical general discovery because that's what is being funded to research by big money.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Actually, I don't know that now. I must've seen something wrong.
How will that affect the fact that you're mistyping people at least 9 times out of 10?I just want them to verify what I've always know. That way it's indispensable and no one will argue with me when I types them
That I still types you SLI and for some reason you view your self otherwise is baffling to me.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
You are delusional.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
