It's trendy! I want one, come on! AMA, SMH, FFS!
Fuck me brainless with your questions-you know me, you love me, you hate me! Just DO IT!
My type
It's trendy! I want one, come on! AMA, SMH, FFS!
Fuck me brainless with your questions-you know me, you love me, you hate me! Just DO IT!
Well you definitely seem like an SF, thats for sure. Usually I think of ESIs as being a very rigid and serious type, you seem more bouncy like an SEE. Either way I don't sense any conflict/super-ego vibes from you at all which makes me wonder. Take my opinion with a grain of salt though, I am not an expert on gamma SFs.
If you want to cosplay better and introverted type you need to create less typing themes. Don't take example from "introverted" Maritsa.
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...-(nondescript)
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...tionnaire-more
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...553-A-question
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...-(nondescript)
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin.../49681-VI-time!
Better write in the profile ENFJ, so should be more natural.
You don't seem any particular type to me because I don't know you and don't know enough about you. You seem to display that you have raged which I don't think is natural of Se types. I don't think that you are either SEE or ESI. Why don't I think that they will say that they just raged? because they will have given up something that makes them look weak.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Oh thank you. I'll look at the videosOriginally Posted by Sol
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Video typing is too dynamic for me. I can't get any impression except how much you like to talk
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 10-18-2015 at 08:42 PM.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
ISTp final
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Didn't you say something else originally? Anyhow, why is it more natural?
Fair enough, why?ISTp final
because ISTp in absence of their dual talk a lot. That's one
In your breakdown of the dichotomies you described yourself as strategic dynamic type. From what I also gather you are practical and economical as you concentrate on the things that are useful and useless. My overall impression is that you are Ip temperament. Calm relaxed inert. You also realize people should be the way they are and changing them is not going to always work, so you're accepting. In ten videos you don't fidget much.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
your own rage made you feel uncomfortable to the point that you had to walk away
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Come on! I haven't been raped nearly enough! There is still space for doubt!
I very much and very possibly am a 6. I could take a RHETI-sure why not? It's only 15$.
Take the SEDIG, it's free and meant to be better than the RHETI.
Hello,
What exactly makes you doubt of your actual ESI typing? Could you please tell us what confuse you?
Multiple applications confuse me. Like how Se could be this or Ti could be that. I could see myself as TeNi seeking or in other words a kind of a man who actively seeks unified solutions. Like I have a problem and then immediately I ask an expert( GOOGLE
Se ~< Si
Ne < Ni
Fe << Fi
Te >> Ti
Is like crazy
Meant? It is better according to most independent studies. Tho, whether it's better than WEPSS is ... up to anyone's guess. It should be better at determining the main type while WEPSS is supposed to be better at determining the wings and stuff like that.
Anyhow, I IMMEDIATELY identified with the statement A: "I approach things in an all-or-nothing way, especially issues that matter to me. I place a lot of value on being strong, honest, and dependable. What you see is what you get. I don't trust others until they have proven themselves to be reliable. I like people to be direct with me, and I know when someone is being devious, lying, or trying to manipulate me. I have a hard time tolerating weakness in people, unless I understand the reason for their weakness or I see that they're trying to do something about it. I also have a hard time following orders or direction if I do not respect or agree with the person in authority. I am much better at taking charge myself. I find it difficult not to display my feelings when I am angry. I am always ready to stick up for friends or loved ones, especially if I think they are being treated unjustly. I may not win every battle with others, but they'll know I've been there."
Regardless, it's an eight. 8 for sure
I see. According to this, we are already sure that you are a Gamma/Delta, leaning toward Gamma I guess. We can probably assume that you are Gamma at this point. Otherwise, maybe you should say how you could see yourself as an Si valuing type. We could clarify this situation if I could know your understanding of these IEs and how they are related to you.Multiple applications confuse me. Like how Se could be this or Ti could be that. I could see myself as TeNi seeking or in other words a kind of a man who actively seeks unified solutions. Like I have a problem and then immediately I ask an expert( GOOGLE
Se ~< Si
Ne < Ni
Fe << Fi
Te >> Ti
Is like crazy
If you are Gamma, then you are doubting between the 4 types I guess. I can be wrong, but the fact that you "feel" like you could be good at Te, doesn't strike me strongly as what a Te-dominant would say. They are generally focused on facts and always try to make sense of everything. It is also a bit reductive, to say that Te is money management.
Ok, resource management, whatever.
I think I have Si as 4th but on the other side. I sometimes also feel as if my PoLR is actually Fe-I don't necessarily like noise, crowds...ah those are typical introvert things are they not?
Anyhow I am debating SiTe vs FiSe lol. It'll require a great deal of introspection. ah well, fuck the introspection
Te is the logic of actions, and how we can empirically draw logical conclusions.Ok, resource management, whatever.
I think I have Si as 4th but on the other side. I sometimes also feel as if my PoLR is actually Fe-I don't necessarily like noise, crowds...ah those are typical introvert things are they not?
Anyhow I am debating SiTe vs FiSe lol. It'll require a great deal of introspection. ah well, fuck the introspection
So, now you are telling me that you are doubting between two sensing types. First of all, it would be erroneous to say that disliking noise and crowds is related to Fe PoLR indeed. I think that most people do, and as you said especially introverts.
A simple way to tell apart both SLI and ESI, would be to know if you are an ethic type, or a logic type. What are your hypothesis about it?
Things such as these could only be proven via real test anyhow. Like a test of ability or something. If only someone wise made practical applications for all of this. Like, behaviouraly testable units? That'd be nice.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
