LSE?
David Gandy
LSE?
Last edited by suedehead; 12-04-2015 at 07:48 AM.
Similar to this guy. Both have algorithm cognition seemingly.
not ESTJ
Well I'm sold, two words all that needed to be heard, thanks for the deep analysis its pretty incredible the breadth and depth of your knowledge.Originally Posted by Sol
: D
To type correctly you don't need many time and words.While all today "deep analysis" is just an ambiguous speculation and hence is much useless. Also today manysmartwords speculations don't give significantly higher match in typing than typing by intuitive impressions from nonverbal behavior, - hence have not better objective basis and are senseless as take much more efforts.
So - welcome! I recommend you study better methods and take more adequately "deep analysis" astrology.
I disagree. Words and thoughts when it comes to typing here fill the sound barrier. For instance, would you explain why most of your video example INFps are blond haired ditzy bimbos?To type correctly you don't need many time and words.
So - welcome! I recommend you study better methods and take more adequately "deep analysis" astrology.
Bump.
bump
Yo I never knew what he sounded like. I pictured him to have a super deep voice and act like an LSI.
I don't know what type he could be though.
The Barnum or Forer effect is the tendency for people to judge that general, universally valid statements about personality are actually specific descriptions of their own personalities. A "universally valid" statement is one that is true of everyone—or, more likely, nearly everyone. It is not known why people tend to make such misjudgments, but the effect has been experimentally reproduced.
The psychologist Paul Meehl named this fallacy "the P.T. Barnum effect" because Barnum built his circus and dime museum on the principle of having something for everyone. It is also called "the Forer effect" after its discoverer, the psychologist Bertram R. Forer, who modestly dubbed it "the fallacy of personal validation".
I'm thinking EIE chad.
The Barnum or Forer effect is the tendency for people to judge that general, universally valid statements about personality are actually specific descriptions of their own personalities. A "universally valid" statement is one that is true of everyone—or, more likely, nearly everyone. It is not known why people tend to make such misjudgments, but the effect has been experimentally reproduced.
The psychologist Paul Meehl named this fallacy "the P.T. Barnum effect" because Barnum built his circus and dime museum on the principle of having something for everyone. It is also called "the Forer effect" after its discoverer, the psychologist Bertram R. Forer, who modestly dubbed it "the fallacy of personal validation".
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote