User Tag List

Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Hi Guys

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    1
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Hi Guys

    First post! I'm Nick : )

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    5,048
    Mentioned
    381 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    make video-interview if you want to know opinions about your type wich have reasonable chance to be correct
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    TIM
    LSI-Se sx
    Posts
    3,394
    Mentioned
    340 Post(s)
    Tagged
    25 Thread(s)

    Default

    lol @Sol, you are getting really crazy about this video bs

    hi @nick1355!

  4. #4
    Arete GuavaDrunk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Now in stores near you.
    TIM
    EIE 9w8-5-4 s?
    Posts
    1,524
    Mentioned
    100 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Reason is a whore.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    5,048
    Mentioned
    381 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Myst View Post
    you are getting really crazy about this video bs
    It's not a bullshit, but the best offline typing way. When your abbilities are good for it, certainly.
    Bullshit is to type people by questionnaires only (especially short and primitive as the one recommended on this forum) and by photos, as it have no enough information about nonverbal behavior.

    For your better understanding. According to experiments on socioforum, typing by random videos (several) gives max and average match not lower (average was higher a little) than typing by questionnaires and questionnaires+photos. Hence it has not less objective basis for typing, at least. Also it's more funny to type by videos. If a man will say something useful for typing in a video-interview (as it's typing video, not random), - then the accuracy should be higher. A questionnaire may be made as an addition, so questionnaires-funs may ask for them and in many cases get them.
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    TIM
    LSI-Se sx
    Posts
    3,394
    Mentioned
    340 Post(s)
    Tagged
    25 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    It's not a bullshit, but the best offline typing way. When your abbilities are good for it, certainly.
    Bullshit is to type people by questionnaires only (especially short and primitive as the one recommended on this forum) and by photos, as it have no enough information about nonverbal behavior.

    For your better understanding. According to experiments on socioforum, typing by random videos (several) gives max and average match not lower (average was higher a little) than typing by questionnaires and questionnaires+photos. Hence it has not less objective basis for typing, at least. Also it's more funny to type by videos. If a man will say something useful for typing in a video-interview (as it's typing video, not random), - then the accuracy should be higher. A questionnaire may be made as an addition, so questionnaires-funs may ask for them and in many cases get them.
    How much higher was the average?

  7. #7
    both sides, now wacey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Canada
    TIM
    9w8
    Posts
    3,272
    Mentioned
    124 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    welcome to the16t
    "If this to end in fire, then we should all burn together. Watch the flames climb higher into the night."

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •