.
.
.
Last edited by oldaccount; 08-10-2015 at 03:21 PM.
@7576
Ne ego
Alpha>Delta ?
I don't see much Ni ....
eh. Fe is kinda present .... otherwise I'd suggest Ne ego. Do Delta NFs brag about the number of tears they shed when they read books or how they had to call 911 coz they were humiliated as kids.
Last edited by Amber; 05-18-2015 at 09:41 AM.
I'm very conservative about this: I consider the sexual act to be sacred, and because of that I also believe it has to occur in a very specific context of love and lawfulness (in the religious sense).
yeah, baby.
Now this is a hard one, the "why". When I was a child, I couldn't keep myself from crying on some occasions: when someone disappointed me (specially by not being whom I believed him to be), for instance, or when somehow exposed and/or humiliated. Then I grew colder, and also more capable of not giving so much external expression to my feelings; now it takes more subtle things to make me feel like crying, to cry in the inside or even outside.
Once I was following a parade, and there was a very small girl before me, and she looked so innocent and vulnerable, and I can't begin to imagine why but looking at her made me want to cry right then and there; maybe I can say why: I wanted to cry because of her innocence — problem is: I don't think many would be able to accept this as a reason in itself.
nope.
Not IEI, IXFX type. SEI or EII to consider. ESI less likely.
Part 1 : Exactly. A Fi type would avoid talking about what you nonchalantly approached ...even if sometimes their cornea may get a bit humid during a film or whatever.Originally Posted by 7576
In part 2 you started preaching about maturity as reflected in a collective, majority, behavioral norms, and other crappo which disregards individuality...so Alpha SF kinda works. Do you wanna be my mommy. Not sure I wann-a mommy with a pink bandaged head and self-declared depressive mania who rants about other posters as if.
Part 3 : you are a heavy Fe user with a visible "convention" (norm) tinge > creativity or more or less intense / theatrical expression (Beta). And you are absolutely not a J type. SEI is all you get.
In the beginning of the questionnaire, I was thinking EII, but I don't see much intuition. Lack of intuition, introversion, lack of direction in life, democratic alpha values, my best hypothesis is SEI raised under the unusual circumstances.
Besides, though I realize it's entirely subjective, but the author significantly reminds me of two of my close SEI people (reading all the time and describing feelings about movies/books in depth, playing with words like if the words are real existing objects, ability to "shut off" environment and make self somewhat comfortable without detaching - again, I maybe totally wrong with my extrapolations, but that's my impression on the questionnaire)
Fi kinda prefers some sort of "refinement"/ transfiguration of emotions imo and is prone to finding what you so loosely described a bit embarrassing (in front of the self, not necessarily others).
Uh, everyone probably loved your avatar .... which is why you changed it, right. Dunno what other ppl said about it and why ... but that was definitely a choice of a person not-very-at-peace with themselves ... in-need of cure maybe ... there was some sort of self-hatred reflected in your avatar. So mea culpa if that didn't look like some awesome piece of contemporary art and it hinted at other stuff.
I'll give this a try-
My typing of you 7576 consists of a different take on @left 4 dead's helpful tip to me- which was Ego block + hidden agenda (Astonishingly helpful for me)
I recognize what I see within your writing: as elements of Dialectical-Algorithmic Cognition, your mind appears to fold, not in the manner of Vortical-Synergetic (IEI) unfolding, a (rather gross reduction on my part)
It is apparent to me that understanding is your hidden agenda. So from four types down to two, after deducing the hidden agenda: SEI with a preference of Fe, occasional temporary blasts of Ni from its tertiary position in the stack
Sure-
Hidden agenda: http://www.socionics.com/articles/hiddena.htm
Gulenko's Cognitive styles: http://www.wikisocion.org/en/index.p...e_Styles(wiki)
you can if you like read about 'Model A' and other's take on it
Well, what I guess is largely ineffable, my current process, of determining the hidden agenda as its so named, I'll wing it- here goes:
To do this seems to require a great deal of transposition on what is largely a Ni synthesis for me into words here, perhaps similar to @left 4 dead
I'll rely on weaker tertiary processes to describe, in so that I hold a larger framework of holons at play in mind, and when I read your writing I ascertain; the less I actually ascribe concrete thought, the greater impressions are invoked
These consist of a broad scope of symbology and metaphor of psychic material, from which may not have an end to any meaning, and each thread I follow with my mind;
ESE 2w1 so/sp
I agree with the so/sp 1/2 combo, but he's obviously focused on his own thoughts&inner life.
Idk now, reading more seems like you do have Fe in ego and either Ne valuing or just high Ne, sorry if this isn't helpful.
Yeah no worriesmy point was just that I didn't exactly manage to exclude any of the Fe egos for you lol, I was simply describing what I was seeing in your questionnaire in terms of the Ne
Why intuitive?
In chatbox you do seem quite D-A dynamic in writing
You remind me of a couple other people with that but I think they weren't Fe egos so it's probably just the D-A I'm seeing
Well D-A is negativist, sure, there's three other D-A thinkers, EIE, ILI, LSE. Check them out?
Posting Permissions
