Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 108

Thread: Which types tend to get laid?

  1. #1
    suedehead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    3,025
    Mentioned
    195 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default Which types tend to get laid?

    .
    Last edited by suedehead; 04-08-2016 at 05:27 PM.

  2. #2
    Jarno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    TIM
    ILI-Te
    Posts
    5,375
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    All women types

  3. #3
    ☁ ☁ ☁ ☁ ☁ Birdie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Seattle
    TIM
    EII
    Posts
    840
    Mentioned
    37 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    This is definitely not type related.
    Everything interests me but nothing holds me.

  4. #4
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Berlin
    TIM
    LSI 5w6 sx/so
    Posts
    5,421
    Mentioned
    144 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    my EII sx/so ex (whose pic everyone had the pleasure) would get more women (students included) than many SLEs kinda anytime.....if he wanted to.

  5. #5
    Esaman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    878
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Your can do attitude will fit in right in to PUA, or have given up on that already?

  6. #6
    Esaman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    878
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by suedehead View Post
    Who are you?
    Just one of unlimited number of people you parade your pathetic little hateful self in front of.

  7. #7
    Esaman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    878
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by suedehead View Post
    I want to fucking kill myself.
    Get over your pride, and get medicated. You are not doing ok/thinking right.

  8. #8
    what is essential is invisible to the eye fox's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Space
    TIM
    Seer
    Posts
    12,809
    Mentioned
    368 Post(s)
    Tagged
    9 Thread(s)

    Default

    Smh
    Quote Originally Posted by jxrtes View Post
    betas should be kept in zoos for children to stare and throw pop corn at.

  9. #9
    ouronis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    TIM
    &*self
    Posts
    867
    Mentioned
    43 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    what a weird thread

  10. #10
    ouronis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    TIM
    &*self
    Posts
    867
    Mentioned
    43 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by suedehead View Post
    It's a straightforward question.
    I agree with you, I don't see SLI in there though, not ILE either. And add all gammas besides ILI. And IEI is on the borderline.

  11. #11
    Contra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    TIM
    ILI-Ni
    Posts
    1,405
    Mentioned
    55 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by suedehead View Post
    It's a straightforward question.
    but it's the fact that you're so curious that makes it weird. What could you possibly do with that info?

    It seems you know that it's really not type related, but you'd like it to be so you just assume it to be in the question. The presupposition is just an excuse for your own mentality.

  12. #12
    ouronis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    TIM
    &*self
    Posts
    867
    Mentioned
    43 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by suedehead View Post
    I'm an ESI who can't get pussy. I'm too stiff and serious.
    You're one ESI. When I think of the type of people that get laid often, ESI fits the bill.

  13. #13
    ouronis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    TIM
    &*self
    Posts
    867
    Mentioned
    43 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by suedehead View Post
    That's too fucking bad.
    For who? You?

  14. #14
    Contra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    TIM
    ILI-Ni
    Posts
    1,405
    Mentioned
    55 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by suedehead View Post
    I do think its type related.
    Would you prefer that it wasn't?

  15. #15
    Contra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    TIM
    ILI-Ni
    Posts
    1,405
    Mentioned
    55 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by suedehead View Post
    I'm an ESI who can't get pussy. I'm too stiff and serious.
    I'm pretty sure stiff and serious people have sex too. Whether you're having sex or not is pretty much just a function of your standards.

  16. #16
    ☁ ☁ ☁ ☁ ☁ Birdie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Seattle
    TIM
    EII
    Posts
    840
    Mentioned
    37 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by suedehead View Post
    I think it is. You're telling me an SLE doesn't get more pussy than an EII?
    Sex is a personal preference not a personality preference hombre.
    SO many things effect sex and one's sex drive; specifically your hormones and chemical levels within your body. Not your socionics type.
    Everything interests me but nothing holds me.

  17. #17
    Pookie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    TIM
    IEI-Ni 6w5-9-2 So/Sx
    Posts
    2,131
    Mentioned
    89 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think you could find a correlation, but its clearly not a causation. Se types are naturally inclined to pursue, and the act of being vulnerable and possibly being rejected is something not everyone is willing to do. So that inclination is good for getting laid. Everyone would like to have a perfect bombshell do all the work for you in order to connect with another person, even if only just sexually. But that doesnt really happen, so the peoole who dont pursue ever end up with a non bombshell who pursued them. Just the act of going out of your way to show your interest in someone is tremendously helpful.

    Being happy is another matter. But just sex? Yeah just risk the shame of being rejected. Problem solved.
    I would say that ethically you are still supposed to act as if you have unilateral responsibility; but simultaneously you have to be able to see the other as a fully autonomous, free, aware person.

    Medicalizing social problems has the additional benefit of rendering society not responsible for those social ills. If it’s a disease, it’s nobody’s fault. Yay empiricism.

  18. #18
    ☁ ☁ ☁ ☁ ☁ Birdie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Seattle
    TIM
    EII
    Posts
    840
    Mentioned
    37 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by suedehead View Post
    For example, I have a resting bitch face and deadpan expression which has put off a lot of girls, whereas merry types tend to be good at making a girl feel at ease.
    Really because when men are 'merry' I generally tend to think they are the next god damn Ted Bundy and my ass is going to end up murdered.
    #ThanksNoThanks
    Everything interests me but nothing holds me.

  19. #19
    ☁ ☁ ☁ ☁ ☁ Birdie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Seattle
    TIM
    EII
    Posts
    840
    Mentioned
    37 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pookie View Post
    I think you could find a correlation, but its clearly not a causation. Se types are naturally inclined to pursue, and the act of being vulnerable and possibly being rejected is something not everyone is willing to do. So that inclination is good for getting laid. Everyone would like to have a perfect bombshell do all the work for you in order to connect with another person, even if only just sexually. But that doesnt really happen, so the peoole who dont pursue ever end up with a non bombshell who pursued them. Just the act of going out of your way to show your interest in someone is tremendously helpful.

    Being happy is another matter. But just sex? Yeah just risk the shame of being rejected. Problem solved.
    I find this post constructive but cannot mark it as constructive (wtf) so I am just going to do this awkward thing and say it.
    Everything interests me but nothing holds me.

  20. #20
    ☁ ☁ ☁ ☁ ☁ Birdie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Seattle
    TIM
    EII
    Posts
    840
    Mentioned
    37 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by suedehead View Post
    Not true. I have a high sex drive and would prefer to be having sex, yet I'm not. An SLE would have an easier reaching that objective. You only think it comes down to 'preference' because you're a girl.
    Oh. I did not know my experiences and opinions were invalid because I was female. I forgot this was 1598.
    Everything interests me but nothing holds me.

  21. #21
    ouronis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    TIM
    &*self
    Posts
    867
    Mentioned
    43 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Birdie View Post
    Oh. I did not know my experiences and opinions were invalid because I was female. I forgot this was 1598.
    if you appeal to this you're missing the point

  22. #22
    ☁ ☁ ☁ ☁ ☁ Birdie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Seattle
    TIM
    EII
    Posts
    840
    Mentioned
    37 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by suedehead View Post
    Your opinion is invalid because you're projecting the relationship women have to sex onto men (implying that whether or not someone's sexually active is solely based on their preference or sex drive). Average men get laid based on their personality and charisma, so obviously type would have something to do with it
    Dont put your experiences on women then Suede.
    Everything interests me but nothing holds me.

  23. #23
    Pookie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    TIM
    IEI-Ni 6w5-9-2 So/Sx
    Posts
    2,131
    Mentioned
    89 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Do it anyway.
    I would say that ethically you are still supposed to act as if you have unilateral responsibility; but simultaneously you have to be able to see the other as a fully autonomous, free, aware person.

    Medicalizing social problems has the additional benefit of rendering society not responsible for those social ills. If it’s a disease, it’s nobody’s fault. Yay empiricism.

  24. #24
    Soupman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Grand Britain
    TIM
    Dyslexic 17
    Posts
    330
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Birdie View Post
    This is definitely not type related.
    No it is:

    Top are SEE
    ESE: pleasure hunters

    SLE: conquers
    LSE: your business man

    EIE: miley cyrus
    IEE: adventurous hippy

    LIE: your adventurous researcher
    ILE: goofy outgoing nerd

    LSI: Controlled robot
    SLI: lone artisan

    Bottom ILI and LII

  25. #25
    Haikus
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    MI
    TIM
    IEI-Ni
    Posts
    10,060
    Mentioned
    223 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    The grass isn't greener on the other side....

    If you are a dominant prickish alpha male drug dealer (and black) you will get pussy very easily and girls will fly to you. However, it's still hard to find a special relationship, it's still hard to know if any of those girls really care about you or just because you have a big dick. You still feel depression and hurt... being an alpha male isn't going to miraculously solve all your problems. Attracting the lowest common demoniator of humans/basic bitches isn't the same as a special relationship that makes you smile.

    Heterosexuality isn't a cure-all for life's ailments. People tend to think that, but it's not true.

  26. #26
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    TIM
    SLE/LSE sx/sp
    Posts
    2,489
    Mentioned
    76 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Soupman View Post
    No it is:

    Top are SEE
    ESE: pleasure hunters

    SLE: conquers
    LSE: your business man

    EIE: miley cyrus
    IEE: adventurous hippy

    LIE: your adventurous researcher
    ILE: goofy outgoing nerd

    LSI: Controlled robot
    SLI: lone artisan

    Bottom ILI and LII
    lol

    What about ESI?

  27. #27

    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    224
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    SLE and SEE extroverted aggressors

  28. #28
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Berlin
    TIM
    LSI 5w6 sx/so
    Posts
    5,421
    Mentioned
    144 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by William View Post
    The types which tend to get laid are the people who go out and talk with people they want to get laid with, as opposed to the people who talk about the types of people which tend to get laid.
    This.

    ... and people who are not bitter and set on a "get off your high horse approach"...but more smth. like ....dunno ...seductive one way or another. That works better than abusive lines and being a huge jerk ime.

    Posted by suedehead in response to Birdie

    Your opinion is invalid because you're projecting the relationship women have to sex onto men (implying that whether or not someone's sexually active is solely based on their preference or sex drive). Average men get laid based on their personality and charisma, so type could obviously be a factor.
    there's hardly any difference between men and women when it comes to chances of getting laid based on preferences, sex drive, looks, personality, interpersonal communication skills, lifestyle and so on.

  29. #29
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    TIM
    SLE/LSE sx/sp
    Posts
    2,489
    Mentioned
    76 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Amber View Post
    This.

    ... and people who are not bitter and set on a "get off your high horse approach"...but more smth. like ....dunno ...seductive one way or another. That works better than abusive lines and being a huge jerk ime.



    there's hardly any difference between men and women when it comes to chances of getting laid based on preferences, sex drive, looks, personality, interpersonal communication skills, lifestyle and so on.
    I've never used any sort of PUA technique or lines, i've just spoke to women as people and it's never seemed do have done me any harm.

  30. #30
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    2,540
    Mentioned
    375 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Words View Post
    I've never used any sort of PUA technique or lines, i've just spoke to women as people and it's never seemed do have done me any harm.
    So true. Not only is it difficult to act like someone you're not, but if you get a woman on that basis, keeping her is going to be a tremendous amount of work, and will likely drive you nuts.
    It is far better to just be yourself, be kind, and try to connect with people you like and naturally get along with. Things will work out.
    Last edited by Adam Strange; 05-13-2015 at 03:41 PM.

  31. #31
    Cat Lady aixelsyd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    488
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Heterosexual problems.
    Life's a bitch and she's got me pussy whipped.

  32. #32
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Berlin
    TIM
    LSI 5w6 sx/so
    Posts
    5,421
    Mentioned
    144 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    everything this Person says now sounds like some writing on the restroom walls of a psychiatry hospital.


    Socionically -speaking I see Ne polr in putrefaction (add e4 sp/sx to it) stuck on a track that clearly doesn't work and beating a dead horse. Maybe dualizing is real and the whole theory is not wrong..?

  33. #33
    Cat Lady aixelsyd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    488
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by suedehead View Post
    Why do you think heterosexual males can't have struggles. That's so retarded. Your image of heterosexuality is the natural alpha male that girls want and you're just ignoring the complete hard cases.
    Anyone can struggle, but if you have a job that pays okay money, have nice things like a place of your own, a car, and preferably are hetero (granted gay and bi men I know seem to have no lack of sex in their lives), then I can really say it means you are butt fucking ugly or your attitude is fucking disgusting, or you just don't try. If your demeanor is stiff or whatever the fuck, try practicing smiling in the mirror until it hurts. Learn to laugh instead of pining over pussy. People who can laugh in spite of the shit raining down on them tend to be at least moderately attractive.

    Use dating sites. Some are free. It doesn't make anyone a loser. Just don't be creepy or demanding. No woman owes you shit. But she can tell if you only see her as a piece of meat. Your own mind has set you up for failure, though. Not sure why I bother replying because nothing I or anyone says will change the facts. But seriously, if you'd start with laughing at shit, you'd already improve your chances exponentially.

    Says the mid twenty year old SEE virgin (shut up, mu. I'm making a point to be ironic). The difference between you and I, however, is I know I'm sexy whether I've gotten laid or not.
    Life's a bitch and she's got me pussy whipped.

  34. #34
    2 EVIL I golden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Several stories high
    TIM
    EIE prob 6
    Posts
    2,969
    Mentioned
    106 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    There are actual differences in what will get a woman versus a man to have sex, but that doesn't mean that men are more into casual sex than women are.

    Anyone can learn to relate to people verbally, physically, etc.

    Also, since SLEs came up for discussion. In my experience, SLEs are not necessarily out getting laid left and right; some of the SLEs I know have become pretty guarded, and some of them also prefer a challenge and avoid easy-to-get sex.

  35. #35
    Glorious Member mu4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Mind
    Posts
    7,966
    Mentioned
    568 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think um people who succeed at whatever are generally people who are competent, don't have a ton of anxiety doing that task and spend a lot of time trying to succeed at it.

  36. #36
    what is essential is invisible to the eye fox's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Space
    TIM
    Seer
    Posts
    12,809
    Mentioned
    368 Post(s)
    Tagged
    9 Thread(s)

    Default

    I remember reading something about how attractive people have more sexual partners and tried to look for an article on it, but instead I only found links to this:

    The most attractive women have the least casual sex:
    http://www.hookingupsmart.com/2013/0...st-casual-sex/
    Last edited by fox; 05-13-2015 at 07:37 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by jxrtes View Post
    betas should be kept in zoos for children to stare and throw pop corn at.

  37. #37
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    MACS0647-JD
    TIM
    SEER ~ 458 sx/sp
    Posts
    9,897
    Mentioned
    734 Post(s)
    Tagged
    40 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Starfall View Post
    I remember reading somthing about how attractive people have more sexual partners and tried to look for an article on it, but instead I only found links to this:

    The most attractive women have the least casual sex:
    http://www.hookingupsmart.com/2013/0...st-casual-sex/
    I don't think I ever really wanted "casual sex" but it has happened for various reasons. Like the "friends with benefits" when I was in my teens but even that was on a longer term basis, usually, and I cared about them and they cared about me. At this point in my life it is hard for me to have sex with someone I do not feel a bond and strong chemistry with.

    I am more of a relationship person. I also have to be turned on mentally since physical touch does nothing for me without it. My body just shuts down or I would feel negative sensations even if I were consenting. I don't really consider myself a really "sensual" person unless it is the right sensation and all other necessary elements are in place first. Maybe being sx first is an influence too 'cause I am looking for that overwhelming draw to someone and unless I feel it I have no interest. I do think my role plays a big part in this. I haven't worked it all out yet.

    I did not read this whole thread but I am pretty sure all types are getting laid though considering how many children are invading my neighborhood in the past 10 years.

    "When I ought to be thinking of heaven he will nail me to earth"

     







  38. #38
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Berlin
    TIM
    LSI 5w6 sx/so
    Posts
    5,421
    Mentioned
    144 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by suedehead View Post
    Is he rich?
    he's smoldering hot, highly intelligent (so smart that it's very hard for him to blunder), ambitious ... plus a very effective combo of "alpha" traits (physically&physiologically) and a brand of psychology that also includes feminine sides. Enigmatic > abusive; diplomatic > vulgar. He hardly ever talks about his private feelings (only very obliquely) and he's very focused on his career, friends, partner, hobbies etc. By no means self-absorbed. He also reads people like books and understands them to the bone. He has a rare ability to make many people feel special somehow ...more energized, more in tune with themselves....it's as if with him they don't have to pretend and that rocks.

  39. #39
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    2,540
    Mentioned
    375 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Amber View Post
    Maybe dualizing is real and the whole theory is not wrong..?
    Well, I'm a skeptic about everything, so I've been testing Socionics in my personal life for the past year, and so far, it is ringing true. In particular, the ESI's I have known are people whom I did not at first expect to like for one superficial reason or another (in all cases I didn't know their types when I met them or that such a thing as Duals even existed), but ended up liking them a lot. That has been true for every one of them. I've also seen how other people in my life, of other types, get attached to their Duals. So I would say that the theory is not wrong. What interests me is why it is right.

  40. #40
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    MACS0647-JD
    TIM
    SEER ~ 458 sx/sp
    Posts
    9,897
    Mentioned
    734 Post(s)
    Tagged
    40 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by suedehead View Post
    Okay, so he's some perfect guy with a résumé. An SLE can be a depraved fuck working at mcdonalds and still get pussy.
    Maybe some are but maybe not with their duals (at least the ones I know) unless they are very young and naive. Depravity often draws depravity. In those situations they are a perfect match. I am more likely now to draw people who complement my energy, not disturb it. Most fucked up people are probably not depraved by the official definition?


    "When I ought to be thinking of heaven he will nail me to earth"

     







Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •