@
mu4 great idea. Here's the general stuff on my mind (which, if it becomes more specific, I can try to clarify more).
1) What are the "energy elements" even describing, in contrast with the information elements? In other words, what does the structure of one's energy type tell one about how one manages energy? FOR EXAMPLE --- Se he commented once earlier is a really "heavy" element. So presumably it would be heavy for
everyone, not just Se types. So how would this "heavy" element being "base" for one person and lower for another change their relation to this "heaviness"?
And can he give a description of the energy elements individually? Really the thing I still don't get is somehow what an energy element even is. I get that energomodel is said to be about disturbance of homeostasis, but I'm used to Se, Si, Te, etc being about certain kinds of information. So e.g. Ne conveys the potential of an object. What does Ne in energomodel convey? What does Ti even convey? If not individually, just generally, how to think of what the energy element conveys, and illustration through maybe 1 "energo"-element from introverted and extraverted categories...(is introversion/extraversion still objects v fields in the energomodel?)
2) Basically this thing we're going on about now, i.e., what is the theoretical underpinning of the energomodel on a more fundamental level (that one article gives a lot of description of the specific roles, but the "why" the energy model is structured the way it is still remains less clear) -- for instance, why do E/I alternate in model A, whereas E/I is kind of separated in half in energomodel, kind of like static/dynamic is for model A?
Why is static/dynamic the sort of main division for model A, whereas E/I seems to take its place in energomodel?
And why do process/result seem to flip (something about energy model being the complementary perspective to matter maybe)?
3) Obvious question but important: in what ways do energomodel and model A interact, i.e. instead of being two separate types, how do they talk to each other? One specific there is, if the energy model "sits on top of" the vital block of model A, how does it interact with it? Does it interact with the mental part of model A at all?
4) Once and for all, what's the real relation between energomodel and DCNH? Related? Can you have IP as your dcnh subtype but a different energomodel type, e.g., be LII-H+energomodel SEE, just for kicks?
5) There is a mental and a vital in model A -- the latter corresponds more to energy perhaps (but not the "disturbance" of one's energy state, rather, maybe what is used to maintain stable energy states..). Does Gulenko still use this paradigm? If so, do 4/8 of the energomodel elements correspond to mental things, the way 4/8 of model A are not how one represents information?
6) Ideally one illustration of 2 very different types and what happens as a result of the communication/combo, again something like say, LII-IEI or LII-SEE, etc.