Thomas Sowell

[Sir Knight]

Yes, exactly lol.

It only just now occurs to me to ask this, but, what type do you think Thomas Sowell is?

[mfckr]

.

[Sir Knight]

I mean it would be Ni making the connections, but I'm trying to say that this simple rut way of doing things is more what I see Se types doing; not what I see Ni ego types doing.

Well... what do you see them doing, then?

Good question. I'm trying to type him now. Some Te-EXTj; I used to be inclined towards <ESTj, but now I'm not so sure.

That Frances Fox Piven debate is a great example of Extravert-Rational temperament, yeah. Energy all over the place.

[Disturbed]

Probably Gamma NT creative function subtype maybe LII-Ne but I doubt it. John Carmack liked him (or at least his ideas).

He seems pretty cool, but kind of hard for me to understand. A lot of LIE-Ni are hard for me to understand, a lot of the things they say don't make much sense to me. Ben Shapiro is Te-base and he can be very hard for me to understand (LSE are generally hard for me to understand). Ilana Mercer's type is ILE-Ti [EDIT: LIE-Ni] and her writing is easier for me to understand (but her accent makes her kind of hard to understand when she speaks), she's pretty cool. Unusually for ILE-Ti, she mentions qualities about people themselves frequently, she pays attention to people and makes her preferences pretty clear. She seems to change her mind about things quite frequently.

ILI-Te are usually easy for me to understand, LII-Ti and LSI of both subtypes kind of hard. IEE and EIE kind of vary, but I generally find them easier to understand than LIE-Ni. I like LIE ok but they're not always easy to understand, their preferences are usually clear to me though but their explanations are not.