Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: ambivalent emotional distance

  1. #1
    mercer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    TIM
    SLE
    Posts
    59
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Cool ambivalent emotional distance

    imagine a friend/lover calmly, stiffly keeping you at arm's length with one hand, while passing you affectionate notes with the other
    that should illustrate what i mean, in this case, by ambivalent emotional distance: silent affection paired with a demeanor incongruously distant and/or defensive
    relation to type? victim style romance, sp first, ntr...?

    i might add , there probably are distinctions in type between those who do this

    unconsciously
    consciously but unintentionally
    consciously and intentionally

    and distinctions between those who do this who are insecure vs confident

  2. #2
    mercer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    TIM
    SLE
    Posts
    59
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    BUU-UUMP

  3. #3
    escaping anndelise's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    WA
    TIM
    IEE 649 sx/sp cp
    Posts
    6,359
    Mentioned
    215 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Could be a total mismatch of Love Languages.
    http://www.5lovelanguages.com
    IEE 649 sx/sp cp

  4. #4
    Pookie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    TIM
    IEI-Ni 6w5-9-2 So/Sx
    Posts
    2,372
    Mentioned
    112 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    If it works on you, than thats the type of guy you're attracted too.
    Projection is ordinary. Person A projects at person B, hoping tovalidate something about person A by the response of person B. However, person B, not wanting to be an obejct of someone elses ego and guarding against existential terror constructs a personality which protects his ego and maintain a certain sense of a robust and real self that is different and separate from person A. Sadly, this robust and real self, cut off by defenses of character from the rest of the world, is quite vulnerable and fragile given that it is imaginary and propped up through external feed back. Person B is dimly aware of this and defends against it all the more, even desperately projecting his anxieties back onto person A, with the hope of shoring up his ego with salubrious validation. All of this happens without A or B acknowledging it, of course. Because to face up to it consciously is shocking, in that this is all anybody is doing or can do and it seems absurd when you realize how pathetic it is.

  5. #5
    c esi-se 6w7 spsx ashlesha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    the center of the universe
    Posts
    15,833
    Mentioned
    912 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    i can think of too many type-related or ntr or situational reasons for this to be able to give a helpful answer.

  6. #6
    both sides, now wacey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Canada
    TIM
    9w8
    Posts
    3,512
    Mentioned
    140 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    What is type related is simultaneously how you feel about it and how you react to it.

  7. #7
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Spiritus Mundi
    TIM
    psyche 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    11,347
    Mentioned
    1005 Post(s)
    Tagged
    42 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anndelise View Post
    Could be a total mismatch of Love Languages.
    http://www.5lovelanguages.com
    I was looking for this. Thanks!


    Your Scores

    10 Words of Affirmation
    8 Acts of Service
    6 Quality Time
    4 Physical Touch
    2 Receiving Gifts


    “My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.”​ —C.G. Jung
     
    YWIMW

  8. #8
    escaping anndelise's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    WA
    TIM
    IEE 649 sx/sp cp
    Posts
    6,359
    Mentioned
    215 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Oops, sorry, edited to spoiler it
     

    11 Acts of Service
    10 Physical Touch
    4 Quality Time
    4 Words of Affirmation
    1 Receiving Gifts

    Usually physical touch is the highest, but lately i've been stressed, so the answers changed a bit.

    @Aylen So..basically you would think me too clingy, and only using you for your body.
    IEE 649 sx/sp cp

  9. #9
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Berlin
    TIM
    LSI 5w6 sx/so
    Posts
    5,402
    Mentioned
    144 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mercer View Post
    imagine a friend/lover calmly, stiffly keeping you at arm's length with one hand, while passing you affectionate notes with the other
    that should illustrate what i mean, in this case, by ambivalent emotional distance: silent affection paired with a demeanor incongruously distant and/or defensive
    relation to type? victim style romance, sp first, ntr...?

    i might add , there probably are distinctions in type between those who do this

    unconsciously
    consciously but unintentionally
    consciously and intentionally

    and distinctions between those who do this who are insecure vs confident


    you're describing a bunch of mixed signals ...which Socionics-wise would correspond to Beta Victim romantic style and/or to Gamma SF (in the latter case -- just add some obvious forms of manipulative pursuing to it).

    Outside of socionics ...I would judge by the "intensity" of the defensiveness ... if it's high, then interest is certainly there, but it's all very gamey. I don't think Love languages have anything to do with this ...it looks more like a person with a dismissive romantic/attachment style (or "anxious-dismissive") who is quite sure of their own desirability, but sceptical in regards to the validity of any feelings. If body language is "affirmative" ...personally I would kind of take it as a "yes", but in many cases stuff is not that simple. If you're talking about a specific situation in your life, maybe a bit more context would be useful.

  10. #10
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,952
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think this may be for several reasons none of which are type related
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  11. #11
    mercer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    TIM
    SLE
    Posts
    59
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Agni View Post
    If you're talking about a specific situation in your life...
    nope

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •