hahaha, nice combo:
those descriptions seem kind of flowery and vague to me. i was expecting to relate to the 469 one (since those are the types i've been going between) and i sort of do. but i was surprised to find i could identify at least as much with the 459 one. not sure if i could be a triple withdrawn, though. anyway, since i'm just barely settled on my primary type i don't think i'm ready to play with tritypes anway.
^ are these contradictory? lol.
18 & 45 questions:
9 & 27 questions:
9, 18 & 45 questions:
these are cute (i mean all of them)
Last edited by inumbra; 12-23-2010 at 11:28 AM.
i am such a dope i just realized these were enneagram tests... (the similar minds.com ones)
(i really doubt che guevara being a 4 though)
What do these signs mean—, , etc.? Why cannot socionists use symbols Ne, Ni etc. as in MBTI? Just because they have somewhat different meaning. Socionics and MBTI, each in its own way, have slightly modified the original Jung's description of his 8 psychological types. For this reason, (Ne) is not exactly the same as Ne in MBTI.
Just one example: in MBTI, Se (extraverted sensing) is associated with life pleasures, excitement etc. By contrast, the socionic function (extraverted sensing) is first and foremost associated with control and expansion of personal space (which sometimes can manifest in excessive aagression, but often also manifests in a capability of managing lots of people and things).
For this reason, we consider comparison between MBTI types and socionic types by functions to be rather useless than useful.
-Victor Gulenko, Dmitri Lytov
I always get Saddam myself.
Last edited by Cerelict; 11-05-2014 at 11:27 PM.
ipsa scientia potestas est-adaequatio intellectus et rei
tragic deaths on mountaintops are not appealing ...
I feel like Bill Clinton is my dual.