Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: Ti explaining Ti

  1. #1
    SlavaPHP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    TIM
    ENTP / INTj
    Posts
    138
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Ti explaining Ti

    As ENTP t subtype, I use my Ti to explain my Ne visions.. is it unhealthy for me to explain how my Ti functions using Ti?

  2. #2
    strangeling's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    1,704
    Mentioned
    31 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    No, because you'd know yourself better than other people would; it probably means you are introspective about yourself, which is related to introversion. I think it's only unhealthy when someone thinks they can use their way of thinking to explain another's tbh; though I suppose too much introspection can keep someone in their head too much.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    TIM
    IEI
    Posts
    1,178
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Snowball View Post
    I think it's only unhealthy when someone thinks they can use their way of thinking to explain another's tbh; though I suppose too much introspection can keep someone in their head too much.
    That's bizarre. So then only extroverts can best explain others through extroverted reflecting? Because I would beg to differ... MBTI anyone?

  4. #4
    Breaking stereotypes Suz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    On a chatbox diet
    TIM
    IDK
    Posts
    6,470
    Mentioned
    169 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SlavaPHP View Post
    As ENTP t subtype, I use my Ti to explain my Ne visions.. is it unhealthy for me to explain how my Ti functions using Ti?
    This is probably the most nonsensical post i've ever read.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    TIM
    IEI
    Posts
    1,178
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WorkaholicsAnon View Post
    This is probably the most nonsensical post i've ever read.
    An ENTp would filter and sort through Ne information with Ti. I understand what he's trying to say. I think the problem is that you can't say, "I think, therefore I think." Saying, "I think, therefore I am" is more acceptable, because you're using external criteria (the fact that you exist) to validate internal associations, with the fact that you exist being data.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    TIM
    IEI
    Posts
    1,178
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    In other words, Ti would have to be reflected out in order to be explained. So the answer is no. You can not explain how an introverted function works with another introverted function or even the same function for that matter. For example, whenever I write, it usually has a bubbly overtone to it. But it's not bubbly at all within where it's manufactured. Fe just puts a nice little bow on top of everything after it leaves the Ni/Ti manufacturing facility and before it arrives Fe/Se at your doorstep.

  7. #7
    strangeling's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    1,704
    Mentioned
    31 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    wth

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    TIM
    SLE/LSE sx/sp
    Posts
    2,489
    Mentioned
    76 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SlavaPHP View Post
    As ENTP t subtype, I use my Ti to explain my Ne visions.. is it unhealthy for me to explain how my Ti functions using Ti?
    Do you mean how your Ne functions using Ti?

    Or is it a circular joke on Ti on Ti

    Errrrrrzzzzzz

  9. #9
    SlavaPHP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    TIM
    ENTP / INTj
    Posts
    138
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I feel like I shouldn't have to explain how my Ti explains

  10. #10
    lump's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    TIM
    Fi/Te 6 sp/sx
    Posts
    12,594
    Mentioned
    631 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    lol what is this thread..

  11. #11
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    MACS0647-JD
    TIM
    ILI ~ 458 sx/sp
    Posts
    9,876
    Mentioned
    728 Post(s)
    Tagged
    40 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lungs View Post
    lol what is this thread..
    It's Ne-body's guess.

    "When I ought to be thinking of heaven he will nail me to earth"

     







  12. #12
    SlavaPHP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    TIM
    ENTP / INTj
    Posts
    138
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    There are things people don't want to explain. .. they just do it

  13. #13
    Pookie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    TIM
    IEI-Ni 6w5-9-2 So/Sx
    Posts
    2,125
    Mentioned
    89 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think this makes sense?

    If Ti is your creative, than yeah. It makes sense that your Ti would be used to explain something, even if it's the concept of Ti. That's the point of Contact functions i believe.
    I would say that ethically you are still supposed to act as if you have unilateral responsibility; but simultaneously you have to be able to see the other as a fully autonomous, free, aware person.

    Medicalizing social problems has the additional benefit of rendering society not responsible for those social ills. If it’s a disease, it’s nobody’s fault. Yay empiricism.

  14. #14
    EffyCold The Ineffable's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Wallachia
    TIM
    ILE
    Posts
    2,195
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SlavaPHP View Post
    As ENTP t subtype, I use my Ti to explain my Ne visions.. is it unhealthy for me to explain how my Ti functions using Ti?
    It is unhealty in general that you talk about ILE in the first person because you are not one.
    Shock intuition, diamond logic.
     

    The16types.info Scientific Model

  15. #15
    SlavaPHP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    TIM
    ENTP / INTj
    Posts
    138
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    What type am I then?

  16. #16
    SlavaPHP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    TIM
    ENTP / INTj
    Posts
    138
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    INTj?

  17. #17
    EffyCold The Ineffable's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Wallachia
    TIM
    ILE
    Posts
    2,195
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    It might be LIE (ENTj).
    Shock intuition, diamond logic.
     

    The16types.info Scientific Model

  18. #18
    SlavaPHP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    TIM
    ENTP / INTj
    Posts
    138
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Talking

    Quote Originally Posted by The Ineffable View Post
    It might be LIE (ENTj).
    -Slava

    ENTP/INTP

  19. #19
    EffyCold The Ineffable's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Wallachia
    TIM
    ILE
    Posts
    2,195
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Of course...
    Shock intuition, diamond logic.
     

    The16types.info Scientific Model

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •