Hello
I recently learned socionics. I'm ESTJ in MBTI and the j and p doesn't switch if I'm an extravert.
English is not my mother tongue, so please excuse mistakes.
LSE
Hello
I recently learned socionics. I'm ESTJ in MBTI and the j and p doesn't switch if I'm an extravert.
English is not my mother tongue, so please excuse mistakes.
aight, what brings you to the forum? Isn't knowing your MBTI enough?Originally Posted by FlaxSeed
Welcome
Theories are interesting for me, as well as duality is not a part of MBTI.
intertype relations can be enlightening or lead to a endless process of typing and retyping. Do you really want to reduce people to three letter acronyms? If yes, then again, welcome
(also, good to have another delta, the beta's are breeding too fast to keep in check and we need every normal sane person we can find here!)
Helluuuu and welcome.
Welcome
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
MBTI cannot be translated to socionics. MBTI thinks I am an introvert. MBTI is incompetent.
So you need to know your type independent of MBTI. What is your native language? Have you read Jung?
Abbs you're becoming more like me. .."let's get serious and down to business"
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Welcome to the toilet.
Don't fall in.
That's not very nice. Maybe you should leave relationship making and maintaining to Fis
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Personally I was rofl when I read it.
Your Ne must be faltering if you think the ESTj won't laugh at a simple joke.
Yeah this forum does bring out a side to me that doesn't exist in real life and people who know me there are surprised and people who can easily intuite who i really am like Eliza Thomason know the truth. I'll try to be more like i am irl.Personally I was rofl when I read it.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Well people make up this place that seemed more like we are garbagr.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
To be fair, this place really isn't the most constructive or positivistic place to be. I LIKE it well enough, but I think there's better uses of time...it's just that I don't want to.
So yeah, it's like a toilet, you go there because you must and sometimes you spend quiet time there to avoid pesky people IRL ^^
If anything, it's much too quiet around here. I came from TypeC. I'm tempbanned from there for incessant shitposting.
Sheez, to think a simple joke could cause such a derail.
lolol everything can cause a derail here ^^
I've been welcoming people with analogies to swamps and dante's inferno and never gotten into a derail argument about it yet, so grads, you've succesfully beaten me in the joking welcomes catagory ;-)
Don't do anything to get banned here or you'll be forced to join the WSS or Podlair to get your dayly typology fun fix.
Welcome! I'm almost certainly LSE, but I'm ENTP in MBTT. Theoretically the two should match up, but realistically they don't always.
Nevermind.
Ohhh do we have another badass here?
Welcome to your dual, @Maritsa
After this glorious thread you can decide how often the toilet is flushed lol
And ... Welcome
I think this dual changed their mind about being here lol
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
The hell we do. SFps take no prisoners.
*is looking for a poison phial hidden somewhere deep in her laces, better die before getting captured*
I don't think this member is coming back. ..lesson learned about lse swings sudden abandonment
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Have you ever been at receiving end of restraining order
No why?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Like you locking onto this new forum member if you are like that IRL I know lots of people who rightfully see it as stalking and unwelcoming is why.
I amonly stating facts and observations....hw is that lovking in and even if I was I only have a one track mind
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Oh great.
Now you've spoilt the mystery of your typing thread.
Isn't this quite the pickle you've gotten us into?
I'm not certain what type I am, my typing thread is for absolute clarification.
I guessed ESFp because Se makes one fidgety, more prone to anger bursts, reactive, while Fi makes one in theory immune to unwritten social rules and hierarchies.
But it's not official, and I'll wait for others' opinions.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
