The term Libertarian Socialism has bothered me for some time because I think the term is contradictory. Libertarianism and Socialism are two polar ideas. For socialism to exist, you have to have a centralized body in order to distribute wealth, there is literally no other way besides free exchange. Anarcho-communism takes this concept to an extreme that to me is laughable. No government, no centralized body... communism. Who the fuck is doing the wealth distributing? What is going to stop someone from printing money and distributing it? There are so many flaws in both of these ideas that I sometimes wonder if people have thought them through.