What thinkers in the literature or from the forum have informed your understanding of Socionics concepts?
What's your Socionics school of thought?
What thinkers in the literature or from the forum have informed your understanding of Socionics concepts?
All I really needed was Augusta and some of the real life stories people bring up.
Love is the drug for me.
A primarily classical understanding with an emphasis on quadra values. Aestrivex influenced my understanding most. He emphasized these areas as well as most work done by Rick DeLong and Expat.
Easy Day
Rick probably. I loathe the guy on a personal level, can't stand his insufferable posts about male and female attraction (of course the world is mostly straight but we don't need to develop some psychobabble complementary theory that's snobby to the other side, it's just our animal natures) - but I have to give the guy business cred. He frameworks things in a way that's easy for me to understand.
Well, I have a BS from the Socionics School of Hard Knocks in Samarkand. I am my own authority.
"[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan
Brought to you by socionix.com
Nanashi, Anndelise, krigtheviking, silverchris, and mushrooms
Projection is ordinary. Person A projects at person B, hoping tovalidate something about person A by the response of person B. However, person B, not wanting to be an obejct of someone elses ego and guarding against existential terror constructs a personality which protects his ego and maintain a certain sense of a robust and real self that is different and separate from person A. Sadly, this robust and real self, cut off by defenses of character from the rest of the world, is quite vulnerable and fragile given that it is imaginary and propped up through external feed back. Person B is dimly aware of this and defends against it all the more, even desperately projecting his anxieties back onto person A, with the hope of shoring up his ego with salubrious validation. All of this happens without A or B acknowledging it, of course. Because to face up to it consciously is shocking, in that this is all anybody is doing or can do and it seems absurd when you realize how pathetic it is.
Filatova, Gulenko, Meged, Ovcharov, bits and pieces from Wikisocion, and personal experience.
Filatovan, Novichkoven,
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote