Page 68 of 72 FirstFirst ... 1858646566676869707172 LastLast
Results 2,681 to 2,720 of 2841

Thread: Your typing of forum members

  1. #2681
    what is essential is invisible to the eye fox's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Space
    TIM
    Seer
    Posts
    12,809
    Mentioned
    368 Post(s)
    Tagged
    9 Thread(s)

    Default

    Sol: SEI
    Quote Originally Posted by jxrtes View Post
    betas should be kept in zoos for children to stare and throw pop corn at.

  2. #2682
    Word Definition Warrior – WDW Troll Nr 007's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    dispersed into the cosmos
    TIM
    H-ILE-Ne 7w6-2w1-1w9
    Posts
    1,974
    Mentioned
    68 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Funny methods to be discovered in typology:
    VI, mojo and the new comer in town is gut.

    Enneagram 3 blindspot. Visual deficits in 4, 8. Triple instinctual blindspot.

    Highly immature Discord channel
    because enneagram is just too simple and therefore we need to develop a new classification system called Rhombic triacontahedron with life module containing eukaryotes, prokaryotes and virus.

  3. #2683

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    5,110
    Mentioned
    386 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    @Scarper possible base Fi. or T type with E-9 if such the nature holds
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  4. #2684

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    5,110
    Mentioned
    386 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fox View Post
    Sol: SEI
    thanks for the new version
    *kisses* and *hugs* [or what SEI do there]
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  5. #2685

    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    TIM
    SLI
    Posts
    364
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    @Scarper possible base Fi. or T type with E-9 if such the nature holds
    It's a good combination.

    Fi base is a bit much for me, but I'd like it. Fi valuing and T type likely.

    I test as SLI, IR in real life fit mostly Delta, preferring IEE.

    Other types I considered, SEI due to being close to SLI, and LSI based on being close to SLI - at least on dichotomies.

    E9 or E6 - not decided.

    I think this has mostly came about from me requesting you to cool off a bit in your pursuit of reverie, but that's OK if it's the case, each types got their own way of reacting

    One of the reasons I like to avoid controversy, lifes too short, which could be E9 possibly too.

    Thanks for the typing.

  6. #2686
    what is essential is invisible to the eye fox's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Space
    TIM
    Seer
    Posts
    12,809
    Mentioned
    368 Post(s)
    Tagged
    9 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    thanks for the new version
    *kisses* and *hugs* [or what SEI do there]
    That was meant to trigger you. Be triggered, dammit.
    Quote Originally Posted by jxrtes View Post
    betas should be kept in zoos for children to stare and throw pop corn at.

  7. #2687

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    5,110
    Mentioned
    386 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Scarper View Post
    IR in real life fit mostly Delta, preferring IEE
    You seem to care about Fi region much. It's suspicious for T, as they mostly don't care about emotions of others (except close ones or some IRL). While you do this sequentially. You talked in details about own emotions with random forumie like there.

    > Other types I considered, SEI due to being close to SLI, and LSI based on being close to SLI - at least on dichotomies.

    I suspect ESI among Fi. If Fe - SEI as the 1st to check.

    > I think this has mostly came about from me requesting you to cool off a bit in your pursuit of reverie

    I've noticed earlier similar style. That's why I've made a generalization. With reverie's flood I've found your argumentation as not solid as it could, and that seemed was due to your emotional motivation. As reverie is not close for you, so this may point to F type.

    > Thanks for the typing.

    I need video to type others. Here I'm pointing on my doubts.
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  8. #2688

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    5,110
    Mentioned
    386 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fox View Post
    That was meant to trigger you. Be triggered, dammit.
    ok
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  9. #2689

    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    TIM
    SLI
    Posts
    364
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    You seem to care about Fi region much. It's suspicious for T, as they mostly don't care about emotions of others (except close ones or some IRL). While you do this sequentially. You talked in details about own emotions with random forumie like there.

    > Other types I considered, SEI due to being close to SLI, and LSI based on being close to SLI - at least on dichotomies.

    I suspect ESI among Fi. If Fe - SEI as the 1st to check.

    > I think this has mostly came about from me requesting you to cool off a bit in your pursuit of reverie

    I've noticed earlier similar style. That's why I've made a generalization. With reverie's flood I've found your argumentation as not solid as it could, and that seemed was due to your emotional motivation. As reverie is not close for you, so this may point to F type.

    > Thanks for the typing.

    I need video to type others. Here I'm pointing on my doubts.
    You should go back to the reverie conversation, some useful advise for you from Gulenko

    SLI's generally are sensitive to the lack of warm and positive emotions, so I try to convey to others what I like, in turn I get more of what I like too.

    Gulenko's recommendation for SLI is to talk to their partner (the person you're addressing) in a serious tone, when conveying emotions. This is something as personal improvement I've taken on board.

    There's other factors too, but to discuss them means 'flood' as you put it comes in to play, but for short, as a Christian, I try to be a light in this world, that is, care for others. My emotional-ness, as you've noticed it, has been affected by that.

    I disagree though that T types mostly don't care about the emotions of others, this is not true, they may have difficulties in knowing what to think about things or relationships, or look for control over initial energetic conditions (Fe), but T types can care as less as F types about emotions, for instance, an F type can have the attitude of, 'it's their own fault.'

    Well, that was interesting I never expected to be typed there haha.

    But, no video from me, I have no need or desire to be typed by it.

  10. #2690

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    5,110
    Mentioned
    386 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Scarper View Post
    You should go back to the reverie conversation, some useful advise for you from Gulenko
    Gulenko should listen my advises to forget Reinin's stuff.

    > SLI's generally are sensitive to the lack of warm and positive emotions

    T types don't feel it clear and don't try to control so openly, while you seem to be sure how to deal in F region. Also the said relates to E-9 which many ESI are.

    > as a Christian, I try to be a light in this world, that is, care for others. My emotional-ness, as you've noticed it, has been affected by that.

    Also don't judge and don't feel offenced: "pretty dickish", "you were nasty and hurt my feelings". You seem closer to F type, than contiguous Christian. Without video it's impossible to relate your strange for T types behavior to non-types factors.

    > I disagree though that T types mostly don't care about the emotions of others, this is not true

    It's true where they argue on logical themes. To concentrate on T, we block F.

    > I never expected to be typed there haha.

    On typology forums your behavior may be estimated to the model anywhere. As people watch and study you as a possible example of a type, also noticing contradictions to the profile's type.

    > But, no video from me, I have no need or desire to be typed by it.

    The need you have, as you behave wrongly. While your desire is to use the types for your good, what needs the correct own type. So when you'll understand that being Christian does not explain your assurance and manipulations in F region, then you'll can to get opinions of other people about your type and that needs a video.
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  11. #2691

    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    TIM
    SLI
    Posts
    364
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    Gulenko should listen my advises to forget Reinin's stuff.

    > SLI's generally are sensitive to the lack of warm and positive emotions

    T types don't feel it clear and don't try to control so openly, while you seem to be sure how to deal in F region. Also the said relates to E-9 which many ESI are.

    > as a Christian, I try to be a light in this world, that is, care for others. My emotional-ness, as you've noticed it, has been affected by that.

    Also don't judge and don't feel offenced: "pretty dickish", "you were nasty and hurt my feelings". You seem closer to F type, than contiguous Christian. Without video it's impossible to relate your strange for T types behavior to non-types factors.

    > I disagree though that T types mostly don't care about the emotions of others, this is not true

    It's true where they argue on logical themes. To concentrate on T, we block F.

    > I never expected to be typed there haha.

    On typology forums your behavior may be estimated to the model anywhere. As people watch and study you as a possible example of a type, also noticing contradictions to the profile's type.

    > But, no video from me, I have no need or desire to be typed by it.

    The need you have, as you behave wrongly. While your desire is to use the types for your good, what needs the correct own type. So when you'll understand that being Christian does not explain your assurance and manipulations in F region, then you'll can to get opinions of other people about your type and that needs a video.
    Of course, let's ignore what Gulenko says, and what everyone else says about themself, instead lets agree with @Sol.

    But, if you want to show contradictions to the type profile, then please do, what you have shown instead, is contradictions within yourself, your own want of what I should be to fit in with anything I could say, so mostly nitpicking for the sake of nitpicking.

  12. #2692

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    5,110
    Mentioned
    386 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Scarper View Post
    Of course, let's ignore what Gulenko says, and what everyone else says about themself, instead lets agree with Sol.
    I don't ignore what other say, but take that into account in the degree it has a basis to trust and doubt when there is basis to doubt. You need to think and trust to reason on which I only point, but not to authorities or people you have a sympathy to. While setting of subjects higher than objective sense is F types trait.
    Also you've switched from logical argumentation to personal: a bad Sol disagrees with a heretic pseudosocionist Gulenko and don't trust to evident bs from reverie about her good friendship in bad IR, hence I may shut my eyes on his arguments against mine about how Christianity strongly turns behavior of T types to F types.
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  13. #2693

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    5,110
    Mentioned
    386 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Scarper View Post
    Sol is obsessed with socionics to the point of fanaticism
    You are obsessed with the ignorance.
    Be obsessed is not T types trait, but of brainless and emotional F types which have fanaticism to "authorities" like Gulenko and other bs.
    I have 15 years experience of watching how the typology works. It is the basis to my opinion about the types and IR.
    I was highly sceptical to the typology until have checked own type and have noticed how the theory fits to what I see. Then I studed and watched.
    Besides subjective basis, I've made "IR test" which gave interesting results - they are often not random, some statistically are close to proof the duality hypothesis. IR work even when you watch lame bloggers. When you'd communicate IRL you'd noticed this more clear and deeper. But you need correct types, so the IR theory was noticed - and that's the problem as lame typing and heresies prevent this. To explain bs gotten with wrong types "gulenkos" invent subtypes and other rationalizations.
    Jung's types is strong factor for some appliances, like marriages and friendship. You need some experience to understand me.
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  14. #2694

    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    TIM
    SLI
    Posts
    364
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    I've pointed where it's bad and could be better according to what I know about them and typology theory. She's ESI, her dude is doubtful to be one of good IR and the rest is core theory.
    You are choosing between, either I'm wrong because she "tells you they have a good marriage", or because you typed them to other types. Your choice is 1st - it's due to personal relation, not from objectivity and that's F types "thinking" style.

    > you do ignore what people say

    I don't ignore, but hearing them and then don't trust them blindly and have no high conformism, as you tend to do. As I prefer the reality, but not feelings and relations like you being F type. Your argumentation is all from F side.

    > No amount of videos posted would make you change your mind

    I have no sure opinion still about your type, so with high probability my opinion would be changed. To more or lesser sure about concrete versions of your type. The shift to clear T side is doubtful to happen, but not because "I just want such" or "reverie/Gulenko/etc tells" (like you prefer to "think") but because your forum's behavior is too shifted to F side what makes the probability of T type as not high.

    > Forum investment for me here is mostly for entertainment

    This does not prevent your possibility to get useful info here, like be correctly typed here, and that your opinion about own type may be changed.

    Resume:
    Your type is doubtful to be SLI, as your behavior is clearly closer to F types. I've pointed where.
    Make a video and get more sure opinions about own type, as you have high chance of the mistaking in it. In case you want to use the typology, but not only get an entertainment on forums. Without good checking by IR (>10 of people near you which have good fit to IR theory by your impressions from them) there is no basis to be sure in the your type.
    Forget about heretic Gulenko. Use only classical theory of Jung and Augustinavichiute, and very near. Then you'll not be mistaking by bs hypotheses.
    The long and the short of your argument is that, in your opinion, i'm too nice a person to be T type.

    For further claims of you saying that 'you listen'

    Make a video and get more sure opinions about own type, as you have high chance of the mistaking in it. In case you want to use the typology, but not only get an entertainment on forums. Without good checking by IR (>10 of people near you which have good fit to IR theory by your impressions from them) there is no basis to be sure in the your type.
    Forget about heretic Gulenko. Use only classical theory of Jung and Augustinavichiute, and very near. Then you'll not be mistaking by bs hypotheses.
    Just a few days ago, in delta thread, I had mentioned about a suspected SEE IRL friend, who sat the test and came out as SEE too. You 'discussed' this with me, or rather, gave me orders of what to do. And here you are saying to check IR. I already said that i've done that, and you've seen one example of in real life IR, but that's ignored, somehow forgotten. To fit what you think is logics and clear thinking.

    I'd suggest you take a look from here,

    http://outofthefog.website/traits/

    Maybe,

    http://outofthefog.website/top-100-t.../4/normalizing

    I am no psychologist, but your treatment seems a little like this, it's not pleasant, or normal to have what is said invalidated, then being made to feel the problems with me, ie 'you do read', 'i'm not T it's because of this...' good arguments, and even impressions are fine, but not gaslighting.

    http://outofthefog.website/top-100-t.../4/gaslighting

    Because, what chance do people have, they either accept what you say about them, which is incorrect, or if they react, it's because they are 'Se' - if they don't react, you're still correct, it's because then they are '9'.

  15. #2695

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    5,110
    Mentioned
    386 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Syrup View Post
    I don't have any reason to doubt about Te either.
    To have those reasons you need better qualification.
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  16. #2696

    Default

    I don't know the people on here well enough to type them but i wanted to drop by anyway
    Hey-oh.

  17. #2697
    Bertrand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    2,922
    Mentioned
    255 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

  18. #2698

    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    TIM
    SLI
    Posts
    364
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I couldn't read what you wrote fully, it's a bit blurred, but introspection is more a 1st world problem. I've moved on from that, it's really a progression from where you are, but it's OK, like I said, you mainly work from projections of your own state.

    Socionics is a bit like this, but not just socionics, it creates plenty of time to take up your headspace, but, simpler qualities like, 'treat people how you want to be treated' and not to overthink, although less pretentious, and therefore doesn't get imagined kudos, makes life better.

    My thoughts are, instead of how to look good on the internet, is to build plans on life. Simpler to share simple plans and hopes and dreams with friends/loved ones, go for journeys away, these things I like.

  19. #2699
    Bertrand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    2,922
    Mentioned
    255 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    if all of that is true it raises the question why you're posting at all

    its funny cause I see you as being exclusively preoccupied with "imagined kudos" and all accusations toward me coming from exactly that source

    in any case you can try to spin things however you want it doesn't change my opinion of you, which is you seem like a really terrible person, mainly in a "banality of evil" kind of way... I had hoped it was just a product of age but no such luck I guess
    Last edited by Bertrand; 12-07-2017 at 09:29 AM.

  20. #2700

    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    TIM
    SLI
    Posts
    364
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I've said already why I post, for entertainment purposes, some other reasons related to this I've mentioned in other threads, but not something I care to go over.

    Evil is really a subjective thing. You mostly see me as a banal mannequin. For myself, I've seen you relentlessly hounding @Aylen, admitting to using the like/constructive tool as a means of sarcasm - all ways of messing with people, so I take little of what you say as genuine, mostly just some tiresome pointless debate you can get with partners who've run their course.

  21. #2701

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    5,110
    Mentioned
    386 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Drama dudes, you may read my resume. You saw nothing special in the situation with her. I saw such on forums and IRL also. People are similar, and Se types have specifics.
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  22. #2702
    Denn wir haben hier keine bleibende Statt entelecheia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    torn between the light and dark
    TIM
    FVLE
    Posts
    2,323
    Mentioned
    144 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Sol is making baseless claims to create drama. This is not T type behavior. F type is likely, especially EIE.

  23. #2703
    maniac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    2,730
    Mentioned
    157 Post(s)
    Tagged
    7 Thread(s)

    Default

    bertrand is 9

  24. #2704
    Bertrand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    2,922
    Mentioned
    255 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    entelecheia is just making a joke, it plays off of how in form you say "evidence A leads to type B being likely" but uses as evidence the artificial social consensus you're "creating drama" its basically making fun of the forums in general because it implicates both parties in being less than perfect in some way, which is true, and its usually this sort of confluence that creates conflict, which it has

  25. #2705
    lump's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    TIM
    Fi/Te 641 sp/sx
    Posts
    12,627
    Mentioned
    634 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default


  26. #2706

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    5,110
    Mentioned
    386 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Monica Lewinsky, you were the best
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  27. #2707
    Number 9 large's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Inside yo moms vagina
    TIM
    LSI-Se 6w7 Sx/Sp
    Posts
    862
    Mentioned
    101 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lump View Post
    wtf?

  28. #2708
    lump's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    TIM
    Fi/Te 641 sp/sx
    Posts
    12,627
    Mentioned
    634 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Number 9 large View Post
    wtf?
    i just thought the wise all-knowing tone of your post was funny in contrast to you being a barely grown dudebro outraged that you can't fuck 13 year olds and i thought the picture summed it up.

  29. #2709
    Number 9 large's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Inside yo moms vagina
    TIM
    LSI-Se 6w7 Sx/Sp
    Posts
    862
    Mentioned
    101 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lump View Post
    i just thought the wise all-knowing tone of your post was funny in contrast to you being a barely grown dudebro outraged that you can't fuck 13 year olds and i thought the picture summed it up.
    alright m8 lol

  30. #2710
    Number 9 large's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Inside yo moms vagina
    TIM
    LSI-Se 6w7 Sx/Sp
    Posts
    862
    Mentioned
    101 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lump View Post
    i just thought the wise all-knowing tone of your post was funny in contrast to you being a barely grown dudebro outraged that you can't fuck 13 year olds and i thought the picture summed it up.
    are u 13 tho

  31. #2711
    Number 9 large's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Inside yo moms vagina
    TIM
    LSI-Se 6w7 Sx/Sp
    Posts
    862
    Mentioned
    101 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i guess what someone looks like is more important than what they have to say >.>

  32. #2712
    lump's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    TIM
    Fi/Te 641 sp/sx
    Posts
    12,627
    Mentioned
    634 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default


  33. #2713
    Fembot Olimpia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    TIM
    IEI-1Ni
    Posts
    6,549
    Mentioned
    538 Post(s)
    Tagged
    5 Thread(s)

    Default

    Hahahah

    All that useless drama

    This thread has turned into the virtual equivalent of a "reality" TV show.
    4w5-9w1-5w6 So/Sx

    My typing blog [x]
    My theory blog [x]
    My tumblr blog [x]
    My film blog [x]
    Discord [x]


  34. #2714
    Number 9 large's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Inside yo moms vagina
    TIM
    LSI-Se 6w7 Sx/Sp
    Posts
    862
    Mentioned
    101 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Olimpia View Post
    Hahahah

    All that useless drama

    This thread has turned into the virtual equivalent of a "reality" TV show.

  35. #2715
    Number 9 large's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Inside yo moms vagina
    TIM
    LSI-Se 6w7 Sx/Sp
    Posts
    862
    Mentioned
    101 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    gotta do something on a thursday night amirite

  36. #2716
    Bertrand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    2,922
    Mentioned
    255 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Hey Scarper do you approve of the new banner that's essentially mocking Sol for his english as a second language

    is it fair play because he saw fit to question reverie in a way people considered offensive?

    do you think it could be received as bullying or is it all just "in good fun"..? do you think everyone is laughing "with it" or is it laughing "at" someone?

    does humor contain within it an implicit understanding which is what makes it funny, or is it something that is just funny regardless?

  37. #2717
    lump's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    TIM
    Fi/Te 641 sp/sx
    Posts
    12,627
    Mentioned
    634 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bertrand View Post
    Hey Scarper do you approve of the new banner that's essentially mocking Sol for his english as a second language

    is it fair play because he saw fit to question reverie in a way people considered offensive?

    do you think it could be received as bullying or is it all just "in good fun"..? do you think everyone is laughing "with it" or is it laughing "at" someone?

    does humor contain within it an implicit understanding which is what makes it funny, or is it something that is just funny regardless?
    sol hasn't said anything about it yet but if he outright states that he dislikes it and asks for it to be removed we should probably see that as an indication that he's aware he needs to improve his English and continue making more and more banners to help him, out of love. right? we know best.

    anyway i see it as sort of an homage and a nod to the quirky charm of this place. but i can see how it would be perceived as bullying esp considering the current stuff going on.

  38. #2718
    Number 9 large's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Inside yo moms vagina
    TIM
    LSI-Se 6w7 Sx/Sp
    Posts
    862
    Mentioned
    101 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lump View Post
    sol hasn't said anything about it yet but if he outright states that he dislikes it and asks for it to be removed we should probably see that as an indication that he's aware he needs to improve his English and continue making more and more banners to help him, out of love. right? we know best.

    anyway i see it as sort of an homage and a nod to the quirky charm of this place. but i can see how it would be perceived as bullying esp considering the current stuff going on.
    Wtf do u even care lol.

  39. #2719
    lump's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    TIM
    Fi/Te 641 sp/sx
    Posts
    12,627
    Mentioned
    634 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default


  40. #2720
    Number 9 large's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Inside yo moms vagina
    TIM
    LSI-Se 6w7 Sx/Sp
    Posts
    862
    Mentioned
    101 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lump View Post

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •