Page 70 of 73 FirstFirst ... 20606667686970717273 LastLast
Results 2,761 to 2,800 of 2884

Thread: Your typing of forum members (archived '15-'17)

  1. #2761
    Chthonic Daydream's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    The Snail Spiral
    Posts
    1,245
    Mentioned
    171 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    I have still not met the legendary EISNTFPJ. I'm quite disappointed.

  2. #2762
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    1,134
    Mentioned
    46 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Bertrand's attempts of usage of Fi makes me nervous about the oncoming feeling of nausea, I'd thought LII for him at first, but - his thinking's might be a bit too confused for T as the lead, ILE could make more sense.

    Also Sol - might not really be LSE, all I've seen is posting his own examples of types in various threads, some simplistic understanding of types - not theoretical, but at the same time doesn't listen to additional ideas - makes Ne rejecting possible, could be LSI with supervising by Bertrand - he's really the one pulling the strings.

    But let's not get carried away, for typing is a bit bleh ...

  3. #2763
    Seed my wickedness The Reality Denialist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Spontaneous Human Combustion
    TIM
    EIE-C-Ni ™
    Posts
    8,235
    Mentioned
    335 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chae View Post
    Something that I noticed recently while reading her articles: @anndelise - ILE > IEE. There is structural clarity, and she often incorporates anticipating an emotional response from the reader, then goes on explaining systematically whether this reaction is justified based on the reasoning and facts at hand. IEE would provide the stimulus themselves but not expect something in return, while eschewing clarity, nothing really is concise and fits together. In this very excellent video she made it's clear that logics are her strength, apologies but I have to dig this one up it's too good:

    May I tease you with cognition styles?
    In case of @anndelise I think it points towards holographic panoramic cognition. So my choices are IEE or LII. Content however is usually ethically charged so I'm going to say IEE.
    http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...18#post1242618

    Making a lot from "nothing" by going through the layers... Far from for linear deterministic.

    Sorry but that is what is so confusing about her while she still has lots of similarity with me.
    MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
    Winning is for losers

     

    Sincerely yours,
    idiosyncratic type
    Life is a joke but do you have a life?

    Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org

  4. #2764

    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    434
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Thanks for mistype, bro.

  5. #2765
    Aramas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    2,263
    Mentioned
    127 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nehtaro View Post
    @Aramas oh shit thanks for reminding me. made me think 'why did I think he was Se-seeking' and then I started to remember.
    You're probably IEI tbh, I wouldn't have known if you hadn't reminded me. Funny that you've ended up where I started though; back when I thought you were IEE, you thought you were ESI lol!
    We all come full circle eventually. One thing that you might be able to help me with, though. IEIs are subjectivists, right? They supposedly don't believe in objective truths. Is that the same thing as an objective fact? One of my friends equates the word truth in its enumerable sense, ie the form that can have a plural, with the word fact. Is a truth the same thing as a fact? I think of a truth as a philosophy more than a fact. I think there are objective facts, but not really objective truths. This distinction has always confused me, the one about objective and subjective truths in the Merry/Serious Reinin dichotomy.

    @thehotelambush -- thoughts?
    Last edited by Aramas; 12-13-2017 at 06:35 AM.

  6. #2766
    Aramas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    2,263
    Mentioned
    127 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Scarper View Post
    Bertrand's attempts of usage of Fi makes me nervous about the oncoming feeling of nausea, I'd thought LII for him at first, but - his thinking's might be a bit too confused for T as the lead, ILE could make more sense.

    Also Sol - might not really be LSE, all I've seen is posting his own examples of types in various threads, some simplistic understanding of types - not theoretical, but at the same time doesn't listen to additional ideas - makes Ne rejecting possible, could be LSI with supervising by Bertrand - he's really the one pulling the strings.

    But let's not get carried away, for typing is a bit bleh ...
    LII-Ne is a nice compromise. He is not aware enough of other people to be ILE in my opinion.

  7. #2767
    Seed my wickedness The Reality Denialist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Spontaneous Human Combustion
    TIM
    EIE-C-Ni ™
    Posts
    8,235
    Mentioned
    335 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Nah, I would place Bert in ILE supervision/benefactor ring.

    Kind of high dimensional wanderings without no apparent purpose makes me think of EII. Hard case to crack still.
    @Retsu77 has achieved LSE confirmed label due to his rants. Furthermore due to his inclinations Dialectical-Algortihmic type makes much more sense than Vortical-Synergetic. role is on the drama side than just expressing highs and lows.
    MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
    Winning is for losers

     

    Sincerely yours,
    idiosyncratic type
    Life is a joke but do you have a life?

    Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org

  8. #2768
    Bertrand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    5,896
    Mentioned
    486 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    healer comin' through

  9. #2769
    What's the purpose of SEI? Tallmo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Finland
    TIM
    SEI
    Posts
    4,160
    Mentioned
    305 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cuivienen View Post
    Alpha
    User Name: LII, SX 5
    Sol: LII, SX 1
    Troll Nr 007: ILE, SX 7
    Tallmo: SEI, SP 6
    I didn't see this until now. I am no expert on Enneagram but I think I am a 9.
    The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.

    (Jung on Si)

  10. #2770

    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    434
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Troll Nr 007 View Post
    Nah, I would place Bert in ILE supervision/benefactor ring.

    Kind of high dimensional wanderings without no apparent purpose makes me think of EII. Hard case to crack still.
    @Retsu77 has achieved LSE confirmed label due to his rants. Furthermore due to his inclinations Dialectical-Algortihmic type makes much more sense than Vortical-Synergetic. role is on the drama side than just expressing highs and lows.
    I don't accept it but that's fine.

    I'm starting to think going full SEI is the ticket to finding my "true" socionics type around here. At least it seems to be the case.

    xNTJ in mbti = Si+Fe in socionics. Absolutely.

  11. #2771

    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    434
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bertrand View Post
    healer comin' through
    I really do think you are an FiNe type. Or possibly TiNe. You tend to annoy me the way most Ne creative types do.

  12. #2772
    Exodus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    8,475
    Mentioned
    332 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aramas View Post
    We all come full circle eventually. One thing that you might be able to help me with, though. IEIs are subjectivists, right? They supposedly don't believe in objective truths. Is that the same thing as an objective fact? One of my friends equates the word truth in its enumerable sense, ie the form that can have a plural, with the word fact. Is a truth the same thing as a fact? I think of a truth as a philosophy more than a fact. I think there are objective facts, but not really objective truths. This distinction has always confused me, the one about objective and subjective truths in the Merry/Serious Reinin dichotomy.

    @thehotelambush -- thoughts?
    I have mixed feelings about this terminology... Ti is "subjective" in that it relies on your framework of viewing the world which varies from person to person. But it is totally objective in that if you accept certain premises, you arrive at the same conclusion as anyone else who applies the same rules. Similarly it's not true that Te is somehow "generally accepted facts." Te is the process of empirical verification/falsification or gathering useful information which results in commonly accepted facts. And Ti is the process of logical deduction or checking for (in)consistency.

    If there is a type that deserves to be called "subjectivist", and tends to dispute the whole idea of objective truth it would be IEI. This is also due to low Se. But you could see that in Ne egos also.

  13. #2773
    c esi-se 6w7 spsx ashlesha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    the center of the universe
    Posts
    15,833
    Mentioned
    912 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Retsu77 View Post
    I don't accept it but that's fine.

    I'm starting to think going full SEI is the ticket to finding my "true" socionics type around here. At least it seems to be the case.

    xNTJ in mbti = Si+Fe in socionics. Absolutely.
    just type yourself whatever you want. eventually most of the forum will go along with it because that's how it is and whining won't change that or give you a type.

  14. #2774

    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    434
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lump View Post
    just type yourself whatever you want. eventually most of the forum will go along with it because that's how it is and whining won't change that or give you a type.
    Yeah it's confirmation bias. I am aware of that.

    I already know my type, dude. It was mentioned in the video - though I do wonder if I could be off. Ni/Se valuing is clear. The thinking vs feeling axis I'm less certain of.

    But I can safely dismiss anyone who claims alpha or delta. I don't relate to those quadras at all. I'm scathing and cruel enough to be a Gamma but I am focused on societal issues and I enjoy having fun enough to be Beta. All the mistypes did was prove phrenology... errh, "VI" doesn't work.

  15. #2775
    Bertrand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    5,896
    Mentioned
    486 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thehotelambush View Post
    I have mixed feelings about this terminology... Ti is "subjective" in that it relies on your framework of viewing the world which varies from person to person. But it is totally objective in that if you accept certain premises, you arrive at the same conclusion as anyone else who applies the same rules. Similarly it's not true that Te is somehow "generally accepted facts." Te is the process of empirical verification/falsification or gathering useful information which results in commonly accepted facts. And Ti is the process of logical deduction or checking for (in)consistency.

    If there is a type that deserves to be called "subjectivist", and tends to dispute the whole idea of objective truth it would be IEI. This is also due to low Se. But you could see that in Ne egos also.
    not necessarily, two Ti valuers of equal dimensionality will only come to the same conclusion if given the same premises every time if they understand logic to operate in functionally the same way. In other words, what makes Ti Ti is that it is affect free in its reasoning, but that does not make it objective. It can still differentiate itself along what it believes to be the very rules of inference it follows. Truly objective rational principles are ones all judging functions share, F or T E or I

    9 times out of 10 of course people who encounter eachother in time and space will share functionally similar notions of how Ti ought to proceed, but that is time bound more than anything. I guarantee you Ti of the (distant) past did not ensure same premises-> same conclusion. you might subsume "understanding of rules of logic itself" into base premises, but that simply makes the entire statement trivial, because yes its true that if people have identical understanding and identical premises of course the conclusion will be identical, but that is true across all rational functions. if you subtract that commonality out, Ti is subjective, like I said above, apart from the principles common to all rational functions.

  16. #2776
    Aramas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    2,263
    Mentioned
    127 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thehotelambush View Post
    I have mixed feelings about this terminology... Ti is "subjective" in that it relies on your framework of viewing the world which varies from person to person. But it is totally objective in that if you accept certain premises, you arrive at the same conclusion as anyone else who applies the same rules. Similarly it's not true that Te is somehow "generally accepted facts." Te is the process of empirical verification/falsification or gathering useful information which results in commonly accepted facts. And Ti is the process of logical deduction or checking for (in)consistency.

    If there is a type that deserves to be called "subjectivist", and tends to dispute the whole idea of objective truth it would be IEI. This is also due to low Se. But you could see that in Ne egos also.
    So how would you go about determining Merry and serious? Or Ti and Te valuing in a real scenerio?

    This is the problem I'm having: no one defines what the term "truth" means. It's one of those abstract nouns that could mean a lot of things.

    Is a truth a true statement like - That pillow is yellow - or something else? And if so, what would it mean for that truth to be subjective or objective?

    Would it be a good way to determine Te or Ti valuing to ask if someone accepts the mainstream orthodox opinion on the presence and cause of global warming?
    Last edited by Aramas; 12-13-2017 at 05:16 PM.

  17. #2777
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aramas View Post
    LII-Ne is a nice compromise. He is not aware enough of other people to be ILE in my opinion.
    Bertrand's messages are chaotic. LII do not write such. His style is from F or P.

  18. #2778
    Delilah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    TIM
    EII
    Posts
    1,497
    Mentioned
    94 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    Bertrand's messages are chaotic. LII do not write such. His style is from F or P.
    They are dynamic imo, and I very much doubt an F type for him. Discussing people's motivations;, which by the by you do too (u just use socionics as an umbrella), is not enough to make him an F type.

  19. #2779
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Spiritus Mundi
    TIM
    psyche 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    11,347
    Mentioned
    1005 Post(s)
    Tagged
    42 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aramas View Post
    So how would you go about determining Merry and serious? Or Ti and Te valuing in a real scenerio?

    This is the problem I'm having: no one defines what the term "truth" means. It's one of those abstract nouns that could mean a lot of things.

    Is a truth a true statement like - That pillow is yellow - or something else? And if so, what would it mean for that truth to be subjective or objective?

    Would it be a good way to determine Te or Ti valuing to ask if someone accepts the mainstream orthodox opinion on the presence and cause of global warming?
    That's because truths, like facts, are subject to change as we gain more experience and knowledge. Truth is another word for fact. If you read a statement that has "truth" in it just replace it with "fact" and it probably won't sound as abstract and won't change the way the person meant it although they might disagree on that.

    I have used the concept of why leaves are green and not green before. We accept it is true, or a fact, that leaves are green when in reality they aren't. It is our perception that ultimately makes them appear green.

    https://bensimonds.com/2013/05/30/li...-leaves-green/

    Then you have "ultimate truths" which are a whole different subject. Since ultimate truths are generally more philosophical in nature and probably cannot be understood from a human perspective (even if some of us try).

    Most people don't even know the facts so what they claim as facts are often just "faith" based on what someone else told them, even when it comes to science. I just told you about leaves but will you fact check it? If I want the facts I would have to go to the source but even then...

    “My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.”​ —C.G. Jung
     
    YWIMW

  20. #2780
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Delilah View Post
    is not enough to make him an F type
    I saw him for some time and using far more than you've said to suspect him as F type. Including nonverbal, where I've seen F-I traits. He's clearly not base T, as it's nonsense for them to use his chaotic style of messages. What I've pointed above.

    > which by the by you do too

    I do this from logical side. While he sometimes plays with fantasies which tries funny to rationalize with logical explanations. T type would did that lesser primitively. I saw a time when he've perverted what I said in the _near_ message, it was evident that his words are wrong and T would never did such.
    The strangely low quality (in some places) of his logical thinking is the argument against T type.

  21. #2781
    Delilah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    TIM
    EII
    Posts
    1,497
    Mentioned
    94 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post

    > which by the by you do too

    I do this from logical side. While he sometimes plays with fantasies which tries funny to rationalize with logical explanations. T type would did that lesser primitively. I saw a time when he've perverted what I said in the _near_ message, it was evident that his words are wrong and T would never did such.
    The strangely low quality (in some places) of his logical thinking is the argument against T type
    .
    Imo what you see as F in him could very well be Ni, from what i've deduced based on some posts of his i've read.

  22. #2782
    Aramas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    2,263
    Mentioned
    127 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aylen View Post
    That's because truths, like facts, are subject to change as we gain more experience and knowledge. Truth is another word for fact. If you read a statement that has "truth" in it just replace it with "fact" and it probably won't sound as abstract and won't change the way the person meant it although they might disagree on that.

    I have used the concept of why leaves are green and not green before. We accept it is true, or a fact, that leaves are green when in reality they aren't. It is our perception that ultimately makes them appear green.

    https://bensimonds.com/2013/05/30/li...-leaves-green/

    Then you have "ultimate truths" which are a whole different subject. Since ultimate truths are generally more philosophical in nature and probably cannot be understood from a human perspective (even if some of us try).

    Most people don't even know the facts so what they claim as facts are often just "faith" based on what someone else told them, even when it comes to science. I just told you about leaves but will you fact check it? If I want the facts I would have to go to the source but even then...
    So which one of those truths are we talking about with the Reinin dichotomy, facts or ultimate truths?

    And yeah, I don't really care that much about the greenness of leaves. They're pretty. That's about as far as I go. I know that we perceive green because that's what our eyes and brains do as a result of processing photons that hit the retina at a certain wavelength. But that's about it. And yeah I don't bother checking sources much. I just have this internal sense of, "yeah that seems legit," or not. If I'm super interested, I look stuff up. But the greenness of leaves is not really something I'm all that into.

    What if the answer to the question of objective/subjective truth is that it's an irrelevant question? Not like you can do anything about it either way.

    I think facts are probably objective. But reality could be a projection of my mind. Who knows? Either way, knowing it won't change it.

  23. #2783

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Delilah View Post
    Imo what you see as F in him could very well be Ni, from what i've deduced based on some posts of his i've read.
    Why do you think he's a dynamic type?

  24. #2784
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Spiritus Mundi
    TIM
    psyche 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    11,347
    Mentioned
    1005 Post(s)
    Tagged
    42 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aramas View Post
    So which one of those truths are we talking about with the Reinin dichotomy, facts or ultimate truths?

    And yeah, I don't really care that much about the greenness of leaves. They're pretty. That's about as far as I go. I know that we perceive green because that's what our eyes and brains do as a result of processing photons that hit the retina at a certain wavelength. But that's about it. And yeah I don't bother checking sources much. I just have this internal sense of, "yeah that seems legit," or not.
    Ultimate truths to me are of a spiritual/philosophical nature so would have nothing to do with these man made systems. Reinin is not an ultimate truth or fact in my perception. It is a concept used to help understand other concepts but no one fits neatly into Reinin just like no one fits neatly into their socionics, sun sign or numerology. It is all the same (trying to figure out someone's essence/cognition/personality), just different systems, but like you said, we each have some kind of internal sense of what is legit and what isn't. We are all subjective. Even the most objective of us, which are few on this forum. Then you have people who have their agendas and spread misinformation either on purpose or due to ignorance of the system.

    For example we all look at the same person, like a typing video, or questionnaire and we will focus only on those aspects that support our position of that person's type. All information to the contrary will be filtered out, even what the person or their own mother says about them. Some people prefer Reinin , some Gulenko and some "classic socionics" (like @Sol) but they don't always prefer it because if they perceive themselves to be on the losing end of a debate they will switch teams and abandon their preferred socionist and go back to Aušra OR by adding enneagram/some other system. These "systems" can be correlated but there is no neat fit.

    No one is listening to each other. They just talk past each other and focus on their preferred methods. It is kind of a mindfuck but if you like a good mindfuck then this is the place to be. I guess I should clarify there are some here that don't take it or themselves so seriously so they are not likely to fight about it.

    Like the green leaf, it is all based on perception. That is why I used the leaf example. We might be able to attribute certain words, behavior or movements a person displays to a type but that is because perception is reality to most people. We just don't all share the same perception, even those of us with the same type.

    Basically choose the source that feels legit is all you can do. I choose Jung. There are no great truths here but lots of fascinating viewpoints to consider then dismiss if they don't make sense.

    “My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.”​ —C.G. Jung
     
    YWIMW

  25. #2785
    Delilah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    TIM
    EII
    Posts
    1,497
    Mentioned
    94 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tide View Post
    Why do you think he's a dynamic type?
    there were several reasons, including some quotes from Reinin, but right now due to a prominent feature of his discussions having to do with events/features developing/appearing in time.

  26. #2786
    Aramas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    2,263
    Mentioned
    127 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nehtaro View Post
    @Aramas oh shit thanks for reminding me. made me think 'why did I think he was Se-seeking' and then I started to remember.
    You're probably IEI tbh, I wouldn't have known if you hadn't reminded me. Funny that you've ended up where I started though; back when I thought you were IEE, you thought you were ESI lol!
    Could you explain why you think I'm IEI?

  27. #2787
    Exodus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    8,475
    Mentioned
    332 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aramas View Post
    So how would you go about determining Merry and serious? Or Ti and Te valuing in a real scenerio?
    I wrote a very high-level overview about this in my articles 1 2. I have been meaning to write an article on the specific value dichotomies for a while. It's a complicated subject, but in theory can be derived if you know what the IM elements mean and what valuing a function means. When I learned socionics I read very little material on quadras or values dichotomies per se.

    Would it be a good way to determine Te or Ti valuing to ask if someone accepts the mainstream orthodox opinion on the presence and cause of global warming?
    If you just ask them to answer yes or no - definitely not. If you ask them to explain why they do or don't accept it you may get some useful information regarding their thought process, and what kinds of thinking they prefer or are averse to.

  28. #2788

    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    434
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    Bertrand's messages are chaotic. LII do not write such. His style is from F or P.
    They do in Jung/mbti/other typing systems. Ne ego is chaotic by nature, creative or not.

  29. #2789

    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    434
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aramas View Post
    Could you explain why you think I'm IEI?
    I'd say you're delta NF. I don't see Beta Nf from you at all.

  30. #2790
    Aramas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    2,263
    Mentioned
    127 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Retsu77 View Post
    I'd say you're delta NF. I don't see Beta Nf from you at all.
    I asked Nehtaro that lol, not you. But you're free to answer the question anyway. But the main reason I asked was to try to understand why, not what. So I'll ask you the same question: Why do you think I'm Delta NF?

  31. #2791
    Bertrand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    5,896
    Mentioned
    486 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Retsu77 View Post
    They do in Jung/mbti/other typing systems. Ne ego is chaotic by nature, creative or not.
    fortunately we're on a board for socionics, which means LII has a specific meaning and chaotic by nature is not a property attributed to LII by socionics

  32. #2792

    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    434
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bertrand View Post
    fortunately we're on a board for socionics, which means LII has a specific meaning and chaotic by nature is not a property attributed to LII by socionics
    Yes and fortunately socionics just makes shit up and completely shits in Jung's face. No thanks, bro.

    You can't tell me Ti + Ne suddenly and magically changes to Te + Ni or something because that is absurd.

    Ne ego is chaotic. That is how Ne functions in the ego, regardless of introverted thinking.

  33. #2793
    Bertrand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    5,896
    Mentioned
    486 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    looking forward to you opening your own board so I can go on it and tell you all the ways I think you're wrong

    oh wait, no one gives a fuck what you think, that's why you're here

  34. #2794

    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    434
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bertrand View Post
    looking forward to you opening your own board so I can go on it and tell you all the ways I think you're wrong

    oh wait, no one gives a fuck what you think, that's why you're here
    Well unless this is a goddamned echo chamber, I think I'll keep my views actually.

    I'm here to mock you fools since you are incapable of typing anyone correctly, jackass. lol

  35. #2795
    Bertrand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    5,896
    Mentioned
    486 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    your free thinking view is the totally unoriginal observation that people disagree over type, its not some courageous original voice of dissent, its literally the most low hanging criticism that anyone could make. and you're making it to a bunch of people who already know it all full well and acting as if you're somehow above it all while contributing literally less than nothing in order to resolve it. its like the cheapest form of moral and intellectual counterfeit credit there is and yet you're like "lol echo chamber" as if at the same time your very criticism isn't that everyone disagrees. you just seem profoundly confused, but weirdly arrogant about it at the same time. the most important thing to you seems to be feeling superior to people which just comes across as so profoundly insecure as to be pathetic beyond belief, actively disliking you is like a step up from the pity you engender and maybe that's your whole game with this trolling, which really just makes it all the more sad because your true position is downright subterranean. Jesus, dude, sort yourself out

    New ideas require at least a generation to take root. Psychological innovations even longer, since in this field more than any other practically everybody sets himself up as an authority
    guess he was part of the disagreement is normal "echo chamber"

  36. #2796

    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    434
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bertrand View Post
    your free thinking view is the totally unoriginal observation that people disagree over type, its not some courageous original voice of dissent, its literally the most low hanging criticism that anyone could make. and you're making it to a bunch of people who already know it all full well and acting as if you're somehow above it all while contributing literally less than nothing in order to resolve it. its like the cheapest form of moral and intellectual counterfeit credit there is and yet you're like "lol echo chamber" as if at the same time your very criticism isn't that everyone disagrees. you just seem profoundly confused, but weirdly arrogant about it at the same time. the most important thing to you seems to be feeling superior to people which just comes across as so profoundly insecure as to be pathetic beyond belief, actively disliking you is like a step up from the pity you engender and maybe that's your whole game with this trolling, which really just makes it all the more sad because your true position is downright subterranean. Jesus, dude, sort yourself out



    guess he was part of the disagreement is normal "echo chamber"
    I don't even know what you're talking about. Your posts come across as incoherent drivel 90% of the time. Ne creative confirmed.

  37. #2797
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    1,134
    Mentioned
    46 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Troll Nr 007 View Post
    Nah, I would place Bert in ILE supervision/benefactor ring.

    Kind of high dimensional wanderings without no apparent purpose makes me think of EII. Hard case to crack still.
    @Retsu77 has achieved LSE confirmed label due to his rants. Furthermore due to his inclinations Dialectical-Algortihmic type makes much more sense than Vortical-Synergetic. role is on the drama side than just expressing highs and lows.
    Interesting.

    I see it as a huge big need for attention, for both parties - Fe HA gone out of control. On second thoughts Retsu seems a bit more sensing though, maybe he's SLE.

  38. #2798
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,766
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bertrand View Post
    LII has a specific meaning and chaotic by nature is not a property attributed to LII by socionics
    At least, not in thinking and structure of messages. In weak regions people may to be bad, including mb chaotic for J types.
    Such in F region Ti base types may have chaotic behavior with women, jumping from one bed to other, and in the same time as J types prefering to have a stable wife which tolerates this and knows she's the only serious in his life.

  39. #2799
    WinnieW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    TIM
    alpha NT
    Posts
    1,695
    Mentioned
    49 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Retsu77 View Post
    Ne ego is chaotic by nature, creative or not.
    I guess it is perceived by other people that don't have in their ego block as chaotic. For people with in the ego block, that function produce abstract structures, but it is only understandable for people that have strong conscious intuitive perception.
    is cross-contextual and "out of the box".

  40. #2800
    Bertrand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    5,896
    Mentioned
    486 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Ti/Ni polrs seem most chaotic to me, especially in feeling egos

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •