I can't really quote because I'm using an iPad, but you can go read any of the ESI descriptions and they will say something about valuing a close inner circle...just because ESIs don't care about Fe niceness doesn't mean they don't care about people...you aren't a base feeler if you don't care about people (Fi is called ethics of relations for christsake...) sorry, just noOriginally Posted by Solaris
dude, u live on the moon. all ur life experience prolly comes from socionics profiles. u'r prolly a virgin who likes to debate and create shit dichotomies on this forum. I know Fi ppl from mother to friends to ex. Wtf are u talking about. What does caring about your family have to do with "caring about people" (in general). christ.
Let's keep the discussion civil.
where is absurd. i wonder what he did to make u ban him, when we chatted he was civility incarnated.
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...as-been-banned
It matters little how civil you thought your interaction with Absurd was, but how civil he was with other members over the time he has been here.
i'm sorry, that was too complex for me to understand. You probably have much higher standards than me, kind of double.
From my understanding Absurd was being kind of abusive to people in private. And his behaviour degraded to the point that he was overly destructive. And was given a few chances. He may be fine now, .. but I imagine he's long gone.
List of forum angels with perfect behaviour:
Hkkmr
Ath
Kill4Me
All typed: Angel.
In other news Maritsa is cross that people keep typing her ESE when she is a well known behavioural display of the illustrious and famous EII.
Me, yesterday
Sexy beast
Yeah, @Maritsa - what happened to your list? It used to have a good 50+ listed.
How could I miss the precious moment in history when @InvisibleJim was typed ESE
It hasn't been changed on the spreadsheet. Makes me wonder if somebody did a bit of editing on her post themselves.
Oh yeah, for sure, Maritsa goes back and edits her OP... I've noticed that a long time ago.
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
Oops. I'm tired and think that may have been worded wrong. I meant - I wonder if somebody else edited the post; a mod who has the privileges, or something.
@Maritsa what happened to your list since it looks like you didn't edit it?
i swear this forum has the shortest attention span.
there are two threads with the same title: http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...-forum-members
what happened with maritsa's list?
Omg what happened to my list? I worked on that since 2009
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...-forum-membersOmg what happened to my list? I worked on that since 2009
Hydrangea SEI and final
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
If it's important to you, you really ought to have a copy saved elsewhere. I know this from personal experience.Omg what happened to my list? I worked on that since 2009
But but but.... I thougth the NSA backup service was infallible!!!
lol. Once we had a security problem here and a crap ton of posts disappeared. My post count went down about 3,000 that day! There wasn't a recent back up at the time, but I don't know how often the site is currently backed up or if it's backed up in multiple locations. Plus you never know if it'll for sure always even be around. I'd definitely suggest members back up anything important to them.
I can't remember what i was confirmed and finalled as... gotta be either ISFp or ESFp though going by Maritsa's stats. Someone got me down as EStp and someone else as ESFp though. Maybe I'm actually an LSE???
Now this is a story all about how, my type got changed, turned upside down. Just wait for a minute and watch chatbox right there, & I'll tell how Gem became the moderator with blue hair.
In typology central friended and praised, on the picture thread was where she spent most her days. Chilling out, selfies, relaxing all cool, And all typing some people and getting them schooled.
When a couple of girls who were up to no good, Started annoying her & her friends in the forumhood, She got in one little flame war & got pissed off & said 'I'm moving in with that exboyfriend in the forum with the socionics toffs.
So Gem pulls up to the forum for a year without being a hater, And yells to typocentral 'Yo creeps! Smell Ya later', Became a mod in her kingdom she was finally there, To sit on her throne as the mod with blue hair.
InvisibruJim
Join the club!
@mercutio
SLE-Se 458 (not sure of the order) sx/sp confirmed but not final. I am still open to 468.
I think this is my first typing in this thread and maybe the last, especially if I'm wrong. Huh, I thought I could do this without second guessing or posting a disclaimer. Guess not.
Edit: 8w7 first
Last edited by Aylen; 09-02-2014 at 10:11 PM.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
i'm honored to be typed already. could you describe what made you pick SLI?
the way you ask a lot of carefully worded questions and seem more concerned with gaining perspective seems indicative of IP temperament + Vortical-Synergetic, and between IEI and SLI, you delivery is much more dry and matter-of-fact which had me lean towards SLI. also you just remind me of other SLIs. *shrug*i'm honored to be typed already. could you describe what made you pick SLI?
Interesting that you think so/sx for me. I keep going back and forth between sp/so and so/sx...I also noticed i have a similar "energy" to other so/sx'ers in your list, so idk... thinking lately that what I've thought might be my sp-ness might actually be a consequence of Si-dom.
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
I agree that the socionic typings might be a little off in a bunch of cases, but i actually am finding the instinct stackings she has there for most people to be quite interesting fit certain patterns i've observed... I've always had the impression silke is more of an enneagram person anyway right? And socionic typing can be hard to do from just pure online interaction.
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
SEE
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Posting Permissions
