let's remember, that set in nature are the physical markers for personality.
let's remember, that set in nature are the physical markers for personality.
Hence "program function."Originally Posted by Kill4Me
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
well, looks like aylen removed her picture. that's too bad, it was a perfect match.
You have had it in for me since you thought I was taking your "most likely to be your dual" away and "correcting" your interpretation of something when I first joined. If you seriously think I am EII then you need to reevaluate you typing methods. I don't think you would know Ni if it smacked you right in the third eye. You never show an ounce of Fe and you you seem to value your own Fi judgments way too much. I am not ready to say you are not SLE but I am pretty close. On top of that why are you comparing me to a psychopath? You have a hidden agenda alright but it isn't Fe.
You saying that my using the term "kinda mimicking" someone's debate style is a weak argument for INFj. Also have you considered that could be enneagram 4 related... No probably not, because you don't consider anything but your own internal feelings of like and dislike. It's like you have been lurking in the shadows waiting to pounce again. Just leave me alone and type someone who doesn't care that you are so biased that you type every person you perceive as a badass or a bully, in history, pretty damn close, if not exactly, your own self type and stackings.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
@Bluebird my final typing of you is SEE because you constantly push for your interpretation of things overlooking type description and trying to install your own agenda. Your pictures are VERY facially expressive which is unlike EII and your choice of clothes is bright textured and sensory
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
@Sol what is my type?????
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Birdie does not look as INFJ. I'd look at video to decide about the type in her typing thread.
Now I know where I've got chill. From people on the forum.you look great
I was sick too all last week
Flu?
Shut the front door.
I don't know what type Birdie is because I never typed her but at least she can be made to feel good since she's been continuously sick.
As for your chill. I hope you tend to it well.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
She seems EII to me too now that I type her. She doesn't have big wide open eyes of IEI and she has the elegant chin of EII. Plus I think she could use a caregiver nowShe looks very EII. Dunno what your talkin', this is what EIIs look like.
Sorry for those people Birdie bird E...
I can also see some @bg in therelol
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Lol ok. Beskova explains the features of EII and IEI in here...
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...NFj-by-Beskova
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
are you sure it's not just the messy room and hair soaked in sweat?She looks very EII. Dunno what your talkin', this is what EIIs look like.
Sorry for those people Birdie bird E...
I can also see some @bg in there
(but yeah, after you said that i looked and there is something familiar when i look at birds pic just not sure what, i think in the eyes or somewhere around there)
This needs a little more skills than a person joined the forum in this year typically has.
People discuss what is related to the forum and help her check own type as it seems doubtful.Sorry for those people Birdie
Sorry, Birdie for those who don't understand what this forum is about and set your momentary feelings higher than your long-term interests.
I should start a new list or find my old oneI just feel sad. All my years of work
@Aylen IEI of course and final.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Am I SLI and FINAL or just plain SLI?I should start a new list or find my old one
@Aylen IEI of course and final.
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
Final
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Final
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
I dont think there's anything wrong with revising your old opinions. You do learn more about people over time so initial impressions can change. It's a good reason to not proclaim "final" typings though. I think you should go ahead and make a new fresh list....I should start a new list or find my old one
@Aylen IEI of course and final.
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
Which type do you think I am?
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
Is this you?BUSCUS
*Sorry, you used to just post a lot of pictures, so it's due probability one got inevitably quoted.*
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
The photos don't give any doubt. I doubt you know how to type but most importantly you ignore certain things and are being stubborn. Takes a bit after me but you should try taking your time and learning from the wise.This needs a little more skills than a person joined the forum in this year typically has.
People discuss what is related to the forum and help her check own type as it seems doubtful.
Sorry, Birdie for those who don't understand what this forum is about and set your momentary feelings higher than your long-term interests.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I've broadened the list by including more 16types' members. I have completed the 5w6 list. I've continued to add to the 5w4-IEI correlation. You must understand the enneagram's history on this board, particularly the 5w4's history going back to the age of expat and smilingeyes, to understand why you are going to come across IEI 5w4s mistyped as 4w3. The 5w4 meme here back in the day was pretty much a 5w6 template. What emerged out of that pseudo 5w4 meme was a strict correlation between 5w4 and INTp/INTj. The List changed all that and rerouted the "5w4s" to 5w6, opening up a window for the IEI 5w4s that were forever tucked away in 4-ville. The IEI-5w4 move is not based in a warm cuddly 'aww let's correlate 5w4s to feelers'. There are enough examples like Kurt Cobain out there that independently meet both the markers for 5w4 and IEI. I'm simply ahead of the curve. Age of expat and smilingeyes is dead. I've expanded the reach of the list to include forum members from other boards. This is only the beginning. The List gives all seekers a lens through which anybody can be typed with.
2w1 so/sp: Eliza Thomason
2w1 sx/so: Lonestar Cowgirl (Typoc)
2w1 sx/sp:
2w1 sp/so: Timmy, Jack Oliver Aaron/echidna (wss)
2w1 sp/sx: Maritsa
2w1 so/sx: Emmym
2w3 sx/so: N1cole
2w3 sx/sp: Mercer
2w3 so/sp: Yaaroslav
2w3 so/sx: Limitless
2w3 sp/so:
2w3 sp/sx: Kim, Wacey
3w2 sx/so: Transkar
3w2 sx/sp:
3w2 sp/so: William, Discobiscuit (typoc)
3w2 sp/sx: JocktheMotie (typoc)
3w2 so/sp: Reuben, Bilateralentry (typoc)
3w2 so/sx: Chanaynay (typoc)
3w4 sx/so: Darya
3w4 sx/sp: Starfall, Starcrash (typoc)...eerie
3w4 sp/so: Suedehead, Blobfish (Typoc)
3w4 sp/sx: UDP, Adam Strange, Evil Otter (Typoc)
3w4 so/sp: Lucas, Xerx, Pleep (perc)
3w4 so/sx: JMC
4w3 sx/so: BnD, Blackout (typoc)
4w3 sx/sp: Dolphin
4w3 sp/sx: Mactheknife
4w3 sp/so: Grain of Song
4w3 so/sp: LucyintheSky/IBTL
4w3 so/sx: Silverchris, Summerprincess
4w5 sx/so: ian rust/rat1, megane
4w5 sx/sp: aivonaima
4w5 sp/so: moonraker
4w5 sp/sx: newbornstar
4w5 so/sp: ammonius hermaie/quote unquote
4w5 so/sx: holon
5w4 sx/so: Scapegrace, Evee [typoc (IEI)]
5w4 so/sx: Ku4
5w4 sp/sx: Strrrng (IEI)
5w4 so/sp: Marie
5w4 sp/so: Glam (IEI)
5w4 sx/sp: Velvet (IEI),
5w6 sx/so: Korpsey, Adam (typoc)
5w6 sx/sp: Nyx
5w6 sp/so: Eyeseecold, Cpig, Unary
5w6 sp/sx: Krieger
5w6 so/sp: Noki
5w6 so/sx: Aestrivex
6w5 so/sx: Finale, RME83, pmj, evilrubberduckie (typoc)
6w5 sx/so: Airman
6w5 sx/sp: Pookie, The Whole English, May, MisterNi
6w5 sp/sx: Lungs, Ouronis, Aixelsyd, Radio, Amber, Tellenbach (typoc)
6w5 sp/so: Joy, Menssupermateriam, Soupman, Hacim
6w5 so/sp: InvisibleJim, PeteronFiree, LuchoisLurking, DJ Arendee (perc)
6w7 sx/so: JetCityWoman (intjforum)
6w7 sx/sp: Absurd, Jack Flakk (typoc)
6w7 so/sx: Scarlettlux
6w7 sp/sx: Geneiouws, Nondescript
6w7 so/sp: Lapa
6w7 sp/so: ChrisCorey (infjforum)
7w6 sx/so: Jadae
7w6 sx/sp: discojoe
7w6 sp/so: Anglas
7w6 sp/sx: Hitta
7w6 so/sp: Cubazoan, JohnnyYukon (Typoc)
7w6 so/sx: Mega, Homer1 (Typoc)
7w8 sx/so: Lagerdemon
7w8 sx/sp: Ashton
7w8 so/sx: Mcbain
7w8 sp/sx: Gummi
7w8 so/sp: Myst
7w8 sp/so: Ineffable, Eck (Typoc)
8w7 sx/so: Deestructor/InvisibleHim, FiveSounds (Typoc)
8w7 sx/sp: FDG
8w7 so/sp: Kill4me
8w7 sp/so:
8w7 sp/sx: Mercutio/Satan
8w7 so/sx: Words, Jaguar (Typoc)
8w9 sx/so: Agee
8w9 so/sx: Narc
8w9 sx/sp: Ananke, Wind-up Rex (Typoc)
8w9 sp/sx: Expat
8w9 so/sp: Smilingeyes
8w9 sp/so: Laurie’s Crusador
9w8 sx/sp: Allie
9w8 sp/sx: Spider, Stray
9w8 sx/so: Aquagraph
9w8 sp/so: Olly
9w8 so/sp: Elina (IEI), Rocky
9w8 so/sx: Woof
9w1 sx/so: Aylen, c3vu, Aanule (typoc)
9w1 sx/sp: Pink
9w1 sp/so: Subteigh, Bluebird
9w1 sp/sx: Inumbra, Minde
9w1 so/sp: Krig, End, ChipsandUnderwear
9w1 so/sx: Suz, Enoch
1w9 sx/so: Kore, Mademoiselle (typoc)
1w9 sx/sp: Hkkmr, human101 (typoc)
1w9 sp/so: Esaman
1w9 sp/sx: Parkster
1w9 so/sp: RedVillain, MikeMex
1w9 so/sx: JohannesBloem
1w2 sx/so: MissBabyDoll
1w2 so/sp: Silke (socioniklight.com), Peacebaby (typoc)
1w2 sp/so: Director Abbie
1w2 sx/sp: Agarina
1w2 so/sx: Trevor
1w2 sp/sx: Birdie, Ellonwy (Typoc)
No wonder why I liked Krig so much back in the day. We are type mates.
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
It must be true for you then.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
I hope that you type Aylen IEI because she is.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Subt tactical intuitive type NOT EII
Aren't EII strategic types?
This is one reason why I hesitate to type you EII
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 10-12-2015 at 06:01 PM.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Thank you. I quote him in the thread where he said that he doesn't think and respond like a strategic type
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I'm skeptical about using many of these Reinin Dichotomies for typing, tactical/strategic. It's like you're forcing some commonality between very opposite types, such as Np and Sj.
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
Which is kinda the point though, isn't it? Commonalities among differing types. Constructivist/ Emotivist is another useful one. As is result /process. And if not used to 'heavily', asking/ declaring can be somewhat revealing.
It's as much forcing as saying that whenever you have 3 sets of 2 pens, you have 6 pens. Your problem is, what kind of pen is the set of pens?
Another way of looking at it is a domain and range in linear functions. You can have more then one range corresponding to a domain, but you cannot have more then one domain corresponding to one single range.
The reinins are supplementary to the core Jung dichotomies in a sense. Common ground can be seen when two types, for instance an ESI and EIE, who are both constructivists, emotionally anchor themselves in familiarizing habits and key activities over the course of time in order to experience similar thoughts and feelings as they had before.
@Subteigh according to your VI and dichotomy I type you ILI intp and final. You may check out Filatova's VI examples. Also you look very similar to Pa2s
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
@Subteigh is a good candidate for any Ne-ego type in my book. No way he's ILI.
what about Pa3s?
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
You're thinking LIE? He's100%NOT a rational type.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Ne ego is a person with Ne in their top two.
My top choices were IEE ILI and ILE
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
LIE = Te & Ni in ego.
Ne-ego = ILE, IEE, LII, and EII.
I could see IEE as well as EII, but I'm a believer in self-typing discretion. That is to say, self-typing is somewhat dependent on a subjective understanding of the system.
I say ILE or ILI
No rational
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Posting Permissions
