Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 93

Thread: Logic

  1. #1
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    MACS0647-JD
    TIM
    SEER ~ 458 sx/sp
    Posts
    9,888
    Mentioned
    732 Post(s)
    Tagged
    40 Thread(s)

    Default Logic

    I accused someone of not being logical which got me thinking about logic. I found this quiz and even though it has been awhile since I studied logic. I took it anyway. My last two boyfriends had studied logic. One had a masters in library science and was ILI . The other is an SLE architect. They both tried to teach me formal logic.I have forgotten a lot of it so my score was not very high, ...

    So I have a some questions:

    Are logical types more capable of grasping formal logic than ethical types?

    What does it mean to be a "logical" type in socionics?

    Theoretically, can you change your type through study?


    Some of the questions were very easy but others I could not understand the logic behind the correct answer. Someone tried to help me understand today but they had to go to work and left me frustrated.
    http://www.helloquizzy.com/tests/the...-aptitude-test



    Your result for The Logical Aptitude Test ...
    You Are Semi-Rational.

    You scored 29 out of 45.



    Let's put it this way. You've gone to school. Maybe you learned something about valid reasoning while you were there. You can even hold up a reasoned discourse in a chat...as long as it's really brief.
    But something is wrong. It's just that you lose focus. You can't get your argument to convince anyone, really. You muddle through rhetorical tricks until everyone has forgotten what you were trying to prove in the first place. Then, you will often end with a platitude like: "It's all just relative, right?" Well, no. Your regular failure to connect the premises in a way that matches a valid argument does not prove relativism, or much of anything.
    Just study logic, not your impressions of what you think logic "should be," or what "seems logical" to you -- just dull, formal logic. That much will help your reasoning and make those chats and arguments more substantive than your usual drivel.


    You scored 29% on Validity, higher than
    68% of your peers.



    My biggest problem with these tests are that they do take some focus and I like my answers to come faster. Do intuitive types get their "answers" faster but have a harder time focusing when it requires plain old logic? I am not talking about common sense here since I feel my common sense is pretty intuitive. My critical thinking skills are pretty good as well.


    Edit: I answered every question even when I wasn't sure so it cost me some points. If anyone takes the quiz skip it if you can't figure it out.
    Last edited by Aylen; 11-25-2017 at 06:28 AM. Reason: removed personal info

    "When I ought to be thinking of heaven he will nail me to earth"

     







  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    18,006
    Mentioned
    162 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Ahhh, Ti masturbation. Well, you got the proper forum covered, Aylen. Anyway, may check it after the great soley sunwheel Absurdiess jas left my scorched body and most importantly alcohol has evaporated.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    289
    Mentioned
    29 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    shit test.

    question 5: If someone says, "I killed all of the Gormagians," when is it logically true?
    "correct" answer: It's logically true when Gormagians never existed.

    nope nope nope
    .

  4. #4
    Ti centric krieger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    5,983
    Mentioned
    80 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    lol. what a troll

  5. #5
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    MACS0647-JD
    TIM
    SEER ~ 458 sx/sp
    Posts
    9,888
    Mentioned
    732 Post(s)
    Tagged
    40 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vois View Post
    shit test.

    question 5: If someone says, "I killed all of the Gormagians," when is it logically true?
    "correct" answer: It's logically true when Gormagians never existed.

    nope nope nope
    This question was my main source of frustration and someone tried to explain it to me for a half hour and I kept saying illogical. grrrr

    "When I ought to be thinking of heaven he will nail me to earth"

     







  6. #6
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    MACS0647-JD
    TIM
    SEER ~ 458 sx/sp
    Posts
    9,888
    Mentioned
    732 Post(s)
    Tagged
    40 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by labcoat View Post
    lol. what a troll
    Hah not a troll thread. I am stuck on this logic thing now and once something is stuck in my head I have to sort it out. Therefore I made a thread where I thought someone who knows the answers would answer them Like the question Vois mentioned above is frustrating when someone tries to explain it to me.. If someone is trolling my thread with irrelevant comments because they don't know the answers that's fine too, I want answers to my specific questions, nothing more.

    Edited because of factor.

    Edit @Kim @bg if this is in the wrong section can you please move it. Thank you.
    Last edited by Aylen; 05-22-2014 at 10:51 PM. Reason: link

    "When I ought to be thinking of heaven he will nail me to earth"

     







  7. #7
    Ti centric krieger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    5,983
    Mentioned
    80 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i meant vois' quoted question. if you think their answer is illogical i would say there is probably nothing wrong with your "Ti".

  8. #8
    lump's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    TIM
    Fi/Te 641 sp/sx
    Posts
    12,606
    Mentioned
    631 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    ????????????????

  9. #9
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    MACS0647-JD
    TIM
    SEER ~ 458 sx/sp
    Posts
    9,888
    Mentioned
    732 Post(s)
    Tagged
    40 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by labcoat View Post
    i meant vois' quoted question. if you think their answer is illogical i would say there is probably nothing wrong with your "Ti".
    Sorry I am just on a one track mind right now and took it personal.

    I'm laughing at my own hurt feelings... I am definitely not very rational.

    "When I ought to be thinking of heaven he will nail me to earth"

     







  10. #10
    Eldanen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Southeastern USA
    TIM
    ILI 5w4 sx/??
    Posts
    489
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vois View Post
    shit test.

    question 5: If someone says, "I killed all of the Gormagians," when is it logically true?
    "correct" answer: It's logically true when Gormagians never existed.

    nope nope nope
    Thank you so much.

  11. #11
    the flying pig Capitalist Pig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    5,929
    Mentioned
    122 Post(s)
    Tagged
    7 Thread(s)

    Default

    you guys are making it too about the legality logic math club shit and missing the point

  12. #12
    Eldanen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Southeastern USA
    TIM
    ILI 5w4 sx/??
    Posts
    489
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Capitalist Pig View Post
    you guys are making it too about the legality logic math club shit and missing the point
    Nigga what

  13. #13
    Moderator Reficulris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    2,041
    Mentioned
    188 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    chessclub chessclub logic missing point something!

  14. #14
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    MACS0647-JD
    TIM
    SEER ~ 458 sx/sp
    Posts
    9,888
    Mentioned
    732 Post(s)
    Tagged
    40 Thread(s)

    Default

    I took the quiz again and got "Rational". This time I read the instructions carefully and skipped the questions I was not sure of the first time. Apparently less is more. Following the instructions the first time probably would have been the logical thing to do..

    I am still not comfortable with the answer to the question posted above but maybe I will wrap my head around it some day. I recall having a similar issue with time travel years ago, after reading "The Time Machine", and arguing why it was not possible and then one day I woke up "knowing" that it is theoretically possible. Before that epiphany I was troubled by the idea of human time travel.

    I am still thinking about the questions I asked above though... hint hint I have relaxed about the "Gormagians". It kinda stressed me for a few hours. I have mentioned before that I can feel uncomfortable when I can't figure something out. I find myself thinking that I am the only person in the world that doesn't "get it". I know that is not rational thinking.

    Edit: Lesson for today: rational people do not get in over their heads. heh In real life I would avoid these kinds of discussions until I was sure I could pull it off, except with people I really trust not to make me feel stupid because I don't understand something.
    Last edited by Aylen; 11-25-2017 at 06:32 AM. Reason: edited out personal info

    "When I ought to be thinking of heaven he will nail me to earth"

     







  15. #15
    Hot Message FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Freiburg im Breisgau
    TIM
    ENTj
    Posts
    15,631
    Mentioned
    157 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    There's a difference between being good at subjects / lines of work that require logical thinking and actually using this style of thinking in your everyday life. I would guess the latter is much more culturally influenced, while the former it's more of a skill with a partially innate component and a training component.

    I wouldn't personally trust a SLE telling me "you're not logical". They often seem have their own version of "logic" which is mostly about "whatever kind of argument that makes it look like I am right".
    Last edited by FDG; 05-23-2014 at 09:48 AM.
    Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit

  16. #16
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    18,006
    Mentioned
    162 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Reficulris View Post
    chessclub chessclub logic missing point something!
    Missing point chess math legality logic.

  17. #17

    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    809
    Mentioned
    34 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aylen View Post

    Are logical types more capable of grasping formal logic than ethical types?

    What does it mean to be a "logical" type in socionics?

    Theoretically, can you change your type through study?
    1) Not necessarily.

    2) Logical types are going to use logic as a form of rationalisation in decision making -- which is not necessarily the "logical" thing to do in all cases. Also, it doesn't mean they're logic is without fault.

    Going further: Ti-bases are going to see the world as being logical, something to be evaluated, analysed, and a natural place for drawing firm conclusions from. (Static viewpoint/static response). Te-bases are going to see the world as not being logical enough, and therefore feel a need to bring order and structure into it. (Dynamic viewpoint/static response).

    3) No, you can't change to a logical type. But never think of that as an impediment. Just because you don't see the world as logical doesn't mean logic has to be an alien concept to you. You can be an ethical type and learn to be better at maths than a logical type who hasn't bothered.

  18. #18
    when you see the booty Galen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    everywhere at once
    Posts
    8,449
    Mentioned
    203 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aylen View Post
    Are logical types more capable of grasping formal logic than ethical types?
    Maybe not so much simply grasping it as much as having a natural penchant towards implementing it where applicable.

    Quote Originally Posted by Aylen View Post
    What does it mean to be a "logical" type in socionics?
    A predisposition towards intellectual understanding of received information over experiential synthesis.

    Quote Originally Posted by Aylen View Post
    Theoretically, can you change your type through study?
    Depends on what your theory says.
    "And above all, watch with glittering eyes the whole world around you because the greatest secrets are always hidden in the most unlikely places. Those who don't believe in magic will never find it." -Roald Dahl

    http://forum.socionix.com/
    It's pretty cool

  19. #19

    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    809
    Mentioned
    34 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Galen View Post
    A predisposition towards intellectual understanding of received information over experiential synthesis.
    I'm an ethical type (supposedly), and I've always had this predisposition you speak of.

  20. #20
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    MACS0647-JD
    TIM
    SEER ~ 458 sx/sp
    Posts
    9,888
    Mentioned
    732 Post(s)
    Tagged
    40 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Martrix View Post
    1) Not necessarily.

    2) Logical types are going to use logic as a form of rationalisation in decision making -- which is not necessarily the "logical" thing to do in all cases. Also, it doesn't mean they're logic is without fault.

    Going further: Ti-bases are going to see the world as being logical, something to be evaluated, analysed, and a natural place for drawing firm conclusions from. (Static viewpoint/static response). Te-bases are going to see the world as not being logical enough, and therefore feel a need to bring order and structure into it. (Dynamic viewpoint/static response).

    3) No, you can't change to a logical type. But never think of that as an impediment. Just because you don't see the world as logical doesn't mean logic has to be an alien concept to you. You can be an ethical type and learn to be better at maths than a logical type who hasn't bothered.
    Thanks, I am starting to realize that no matter what I do I am not going to be seen as a Mr Spock logical type. I am so random... I have been this way since childhood according to my family. I do learn pretty fast and was considered a "gifted student" even though I rarely turned in homework. I was sent to alternative school where they used different methods. I was an A student. I quit school before I reached high school though and have been self educated, for the most part, since then. I do seek out people I feel will help me learn and understand but it is on my terms now.

    This seems to be right-brain left-brain related??? I have taken almost every quiz on the internet I could find on it and consistently tested right brain, except when I was under the tutelage of some left brain logical type. Then I test as balanced brain but when they aren't around for a while I quickly revert back to right-brain. It's like they can enhance my left-brain activity and make me use that part of my brain more. I actually like it.

    I really want to know what goes on in those logical brains. My mom is LSI and uneducated but I just see she is a logical type in her demeanor and they way she approaches problems. She can't even read or write English but when I see her wheels turning I just want to scream, "how do you think?". I did ask her that years ago and her response was, "I don't think in Greek anymore I think in English." I guess that was a logical response even though it wasn't an intellectual response so perhaps logical in socionics has less to do with actual intellect than I thought. On some of the visual right/left quizzes my mom views things from a balanced brain perspective. Meh this is something that has my brain whirling right now.

     





     





     


    Last edited by Aylen; 05-23-2014 at 08:17 PM. Reason: clarity

    "When I ought to be thinking of heaven he will nail me to earth"

     







  21. #21
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    18,006
    Mentioned
    162 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aylen View Post
    Thanks, I am starting to realize that no matter what I do I am not going to be seen as a Mr Spock logical type.
    You don't want to be "Capitalist" Pig's type?

    Young lady...

  22. #22
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    MACS0647-JD
    TIM
    SEER ~ 458 sx/sp
    Posts
    9,888
    Mentioned
    732 Post(s)
    Tagged
    40 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Absurd View Post
    You don't want to be "Capitalist" Pig's type?

    Young lady...


    No, I couldn't pull it off... Although when I saw his video, I noticed he is way more laid back than I imagined.

    "When I ought to be thinking of heaven he will nail me to earth"

     







  23. #23
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    18,006
    Mentioned
    162 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aylen View Post


    No, I couldn't pull it off... Although when I saw his video, I noticed he is way more laid back than I imagined.
    Wat? Video?

    Link me, kek.

  24. #24
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    MACS0647-JD
    TIM
    SEER ~ 458 sx/sp
    Posts
    9,888
    Mentioned
    732 Post(s)
    Tagged
    40 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Absurd View Post
    Wat? Video?

    Link me, kek.
    It is somewhere in the "what's my type" section. It changed my perception and made him more human less Spock-like to me. Nice video.

    "When I ought to be thinking of heaven he will nail me to earth"

     







  25. #25
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    18,006
    Mentioned
    162 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aylen View Post
    It is somewhere in the "what's my type" section. It changed my perception and made him more human less Spock-like to me. Nice video.
    Hhahahahahahahahah.

  26. #26
    when you see the booty Galen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    everywhere at once
    Posts
    8,449
    Mentioned
    203 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Martrix View Post
    I'm an ethical type (supposedly), and I've always had this predisposition you speak of.
    Then one of us is lying.
    "And above all, watch with glittering eyes the whole world around you because the greatest secrets are always hidden in the most unlikely places. Those who don't believe in magic will never find it." -Roald Dahl

    http://forum.socionix.com/
    It's pretty cool

  27. #27
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    MACS0647-JD
    TIM
    SEER ~ 458 sx/sp
    Posts
    9,888
    Mentioned
    732 Post(s)
    Tagged
    40 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Galen View Post
    Then one of us is lying.
    Hmm, not necessarily lying if intuition also plays a part in it... Perhaps logic and intuition is the key combination... But an intuitive ethical may have the right order of functions needed to easily grasp logical information in a different way but still get it. They may not be able to express their understanding in the same way as a logical intuitive (order of function may be important or not) type. Just typing out loud here.

    "When I ought to be thinking of heaven he will nail me to earth"

     







  28. #28

    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    809
    Mentioned
    34 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Galen View Post
    Then one of us is lying.
    Lying would entail a deliberate perversion of facts. I don't see why either of us would bother over such a thing.

    It's the one thing that is confusing my typing.

  29. #29
    Kill4Me's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    TIM
    SLE-Ti 8w7 so/sp
    Posts
    1,515
    Mentioned
    155 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aylen View Post
    I draw on my common sense and street smarts to get the upperhand. I am usually plotting 10 steps ahead of them and tend to run circles around them with a mixture of logic and some emotional manipulation.
    I have done this with a couple of ILI as well but their intuitive edge made it a little harder . Academically they could run circles around me but they taught me how to use critical thinking so that I would not come off as "stupid" when I talked to others so that gave me an edge further along in the relationships to turn their logic against them by observing and kinda mimicking their style.
    ah okay...so you were manipulating absurd and invisiblejim on the Free Absurd and other threads.

    But Absurd claims it's you and invisiblejim who are pawns in a game of his design.



    Further more invisiblejim sees himself as an abusive person:



    so which is it...

  30. #30
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    MACS0647-JD
    TIM
    SEER ~ 458 sx/sp
    Posts
    9,888
    Mentioned
    732 Post(s)
    Tagged
    40 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kill4Me View Post
    ah okay...so you were manipulating absurd and invisiblejim on the Free Absurd and other threads.

    But Absurd claims it's you and invisiblejim who are pawns in a game of his design.



    Further more invisiblejim sees himself as an abusive person:



    so which is it...
    Awww, Stanley

    I am feeling compassion for you so I will answer these questions. Don't mistake my kindness for weakness. First of all those were real life romantic relationships I was talking about. It was not a challenge to you as an SLE or related to our interactions so I hope you didn't take it personal.

    RE: Absurd thread... I was supporting my friends and a "cause" (exposing unfair banning practices) in that thread. That's all... see my signature for clarity.

    Please highlight where absurd claims injim and I are his pawns. I just saw a sarcastic post in response to you and Zap/Ath antagonizing him over a long period of time (trying to get him banned) and him letting you know he has dealt with people like you before and knows from experience how to handle you. He basically says he is going to get you to expose yourself, which he did. I didn't read anything else into it.

    InJim is a sarcastic person and has a somewhat dry and sometimes dark sense of humor. I appreciate that kind of humor and it's part of the reason I like him so damn much. Absurd's sense of humor is similar but a bit darker, maybe. They are cool people and I understand them as much as they allow me to. The three of us have things in common. We maintain an aura of mystery in many ways and we don't let a lot of people into our private worlds. Even with all I have shared about myself on this forum I have not exposed all my real vulnerabilities. I keep my iron shield up.

    Instead of trying to find ways to beat me why don't you share something about yourself so people don't think you are just some crazed internet stalker fixated on taking me down...Yeah, you won't and I think I know why. If there is nothing else then let's proceed with "harassing other people." and not talking to each other.

    Edit: Making fun of you is not fun anymore. It makes me feel bad after so just leave me alone unless you have something relevant to the topics in the threads. If you just want to "poke me" keep it to yourself or talk behind my back like you usually do.
    Last edited by Aylen; 05-25-2014 at 04:19 AM.

    "When I ought to be thinking of heaven he will nail me to earth"

     







  31. #31

    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    TIM
    LSI-Se sx
    Posts
    3,394
    Mentioned
    340 Post(s)
    Tagged
    25 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vois View Post
    shit test.

    question 5: If someone says, "I killed all of the Gormagians," when is it logically true?
    "correct" answer: It's logically true when Gormagians never existed.

    nope nope nope
    Quote Originally Posted by Aylen View Post
    This question was my main source of frustration and someone tried to explain it to me for a half hour and I kept saying illogical. grrrr
    If something does not exist then you can safely state anything about it, it will be logically true. Sorry if that's by now trivial for you

    In case it's not clear: not only are all the other answer options are false if you want to interpret them in the most absolutely anal way (which I was perfectly willing to do hehe) but if we state that the Gormagians don't exist then we can deduce everything crazy to be true from that. (Everything that would otherwise be contradictions.) In this sense the statement in the question is logically true.

    Note: there are different ways of logical reasoning outside the scope of basic first order formal logic that deal with these sort of issues differently. But that goes way beyond this test

    Btw I got one question wrong, scored 41 out of 45, test calling me "Most Logical". But that one question is bullshit haha (question 11). (Explanation for why it's bullshit, two answers are logically valid but only one answer is elegant and that's the one that's accepted.)


    You Are Most Logical!

    You scored 41 out of 45.
    You know deduction. You spot inconsistency. You know the difference between a contingency and a tautology. For you, most discourse is more or less transparent. Accept these kudos as the least that this quiz can offer to you.
    If you didn't get a perfect score, wait a week and review the thing then. You definitely have a sense for implications and proofs, but may have gotten caught up in some of the rhetoric along the way.

    Your Analysis (Vertical line = Average)



    • You scored 41% on Validity, higher than 94% of your peers.


    Last edited by Myst; 05-02-2015 at 02:54 PM.

  32. #32
    I've been waiting for you Satan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Behind you
    TIM
    sle sp/sx 845
    Posts
    4,956
    Mentioned
    137 Post(s)
    Tagged
    15 Thread(s)

    Default

    fwiw, i really really hate this test, and i just put random shit for the last two. i couldn't take any more.

    http://www.helloquizzy.com/results/t...y=17&fromCGI=1

    i got you are a dumbass, 17/45

    i was kind of fucking arond earlier too.

    but yeah i struggle with this kind of logic stuff a bit?

  33. #33
    I've been waiting for you Satan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Behind you
    TIM
    sle sp/sx 845
    Posts
    4,956
    Mentioned
    137 Post(s)
    Tagged
    15 Thread(s)

    Default

    i hated this test:

    i mean come on.

    1
    All humans are reptiles.
    Some mammals are omnivores.
    Some primates are humans.
    Something is a mammal only if it is not a reptile.
    Given these and only these premises, which of the following has to be the case?

    Something isn't a mammal if it's a human.
    Some reptiles are omnivores.
    There exists a mammal that is a primate.
    No humans are reptiles.
    2
    A and B is the case if and only if B or C is the case.

    What must follow from this premise?

    If A, then B, and if B, then C.
    B or C, or not B, or not A, and if A, then C.
    If B, then C. Also, if B, then B.
    If B, then A. Also, if C, then A.
    3
    My friend is a junkie.
    All junkies are losers.
    All losers are bothersome.
    Which of the following claims is inconsistent with these premises?

    My friend is a loser.
    My friend is not bothersome.
    All junkies are bothersome.
    All non-bothersome people are non-junkies.
    4
    If someone is an active creature, then everyone is a brainy creature. Cats exist only if there is at least one dog. Natalie is an active cat. What must follow?

    There exists a brainy dog.
    Some dogs are cats.
    Natalie is not a brainy cat.
    Natalie is an active dog.
    5
    If someone says, "I killed all of the Gormagians," when is it logically true?

    It's logically true when all of the Gormagiaons are dead.
    It's logically true when I kill all of the Gormagians.
    It's logically true when Gormagians never existed.
    It's logically true when I kill the last Gormagian.
    6
    There doesn't exist a human that isn't also an invertebrate.

    What must follow given that premise?

    There exists one invertebrate or one human.
    There exists an invertebrate if there is at least one human.
    There is at least one vertebrate human.
    Humans are not invertebrates.
    7
    All collectors are arbiters.
    There exists a collector.
    There exists a collector who is a broker.
    Based on the premises, we could only deduce one of the following. Which one?

    There exists an arbiter.
    There exists a broker who is not an arbiter.
    There exists a collector who is not an arbiter.
    There exists a non-broker.
    8
    Two men walk into a bar.

    Of the two men, one buys a beer.

    Of the two men, one buys a shot of whiskey.

    Of the two men, one buys a martini.


    What follows from these facts?

    One of the men bought one drink.
    One of the men bought three drinks.
    One of the men bought at least two drinks.
    None of the other answers are consistent.
    9
    Some people marvel all people and all people believe some people. Alice is someone.



    If the above statements are true, which of the following is impossible?

    Alice marvels Bruno, and Bruno is believed by Alice.
    Alice believes herself and is marveled by herself.
    All people are marveled by some people, but some people are believed by all people.
    Someone isn't marveled by Alice, or someone doesn't believe her.
    10
    'Both not-A and B' is equivalent to which of the following statements?

    'Either not-A or not-B.'
    'Not either not-A or not-B.'
    'Not either not-A or not, not-B.'
    'Not either not not-A or not-B.'
    11
    'If flangle and flingle, then flingle, then flangle,' also means...

    Flangle and flingle.
    Flangle.
    Flingle, and not flangle.
    Not flangle or not flingle.
    12
    If X equals Y, Y equals Z, and X is the ancestor of Y, then...

    X, Y, and Z are all their own ancestors.
    X is ancestor to Z, but Z is not ancestor to Y.
    Y is ancestor to Z and X, but not himself.
    Y and Z are the only ancestors of each other.
    13
    Where X, Y, and Z designate people, what's another way of saying, "There are exactly two people in the room?"

    X is in the room and Y is in the room, but Z is not in the room.
    X and Z are in the room, and they are not the same, and Y is not in the room.
    X is in the room and Y is in the room, but if a Z is in the room, then Z is either X or Y, and X and Y are not the same!
    X is in the room, and all Y's, if in the room, are the same as X, and Z is in the room.
    14
    You obey bivalence, so if it is false that Barcelona is the capital of Spain, is it true that it is not the case that it's true that it's false that Barcelona is not the capital of Spain?

    No.
    Yes.
    Maybe.
    It depends...
    15
    Either ostriches eat engines or both ostriches eat engines and orangutans eat steering wheels if, and only if...

    Ostriches eat engines.
    Ostriches eat engines and steering wheels.
    Orangutans eat steering wheels and ostriches eat engines.
    Orangutans eat what ostriches eat.

  34. #34
    miss BabyDoll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    TIM
    LSI-se
    Posts
    321
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    You Are Most Logical!

    You scored 41 out of 45.

    You know deduction. You spot inconsistency. You know the difference between a contingency and a tautology. For you, most discourse is more or less transparent. Accept these kudos as the least that this quiz can offer to you.
    If you didn't get a perfect score, wait a week and review the thing then. You definitely have a sense for implications and proofs, but may have gotten caught up in some of the rhetoric along the way.


    Your Analysis (Vertical line = Average)




    • You scored 41% on Validity, higher than 94% of your peers.


    edit; retook it got 45/45

    Your Analysis (Vertical line = Average)


    You scored 45% on Validity, higher than 99% of your peers.


    Last edited by miss BabyDoll; 05-02-2015 at 09:01 AM.
    ipsa scientia potestas est-adaequatio intellectus et rei

  35. #35

    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    TIM
    LSI-Se sx
    Posts
    3,394
    Mentioned
    340 Post(s)
    Tagged
    25 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by miss BabyDoll View Post
    You Are Most Logical!

    You scored 41 out of 45.
    Lol same as me; like the pic?

    ohh and redoing the test, I also score 45/45. I guess not only our types are similar eh?
    Last edited by Myst; 05-02-2015 at 02:22 PM.

  36. #36
    escaping anndelise's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    WA
    TIM
    IEE 649 sx/sp cp
    Posts
    6,329
    Mentioned
    209 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Youch. I answered all the questions as best I could, and ignored what i had read on here, answering it how i would have answered. 25 out of 45, "You scored 25% on Validity, higher than 52% of your peers."
    I don't think I would have done even this well if I hadn't studied symbolic logic many years ago.
    Time to nurse a headache...
    IEE 649 sx/sp cp

  37. #37

    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    TIM
    LSI-Se sx
    Posts
    3,394
    Mentioned
    340 Post(s)
    Tagged
    25 Thread(s)

    Default

    Just some comments where the thread seemed interesting


    Quote Originally Posted by Aylen View Post
    This seems to be right-brain left-brain related??? I have taken almost every quiz on the internet I could find on it and consistently tested right brain, except when I was under the tutelage of some left brain logical type. Then I test as balanced brain but when they aren't around for a while I quickly revert back to right-brain. It's like they can enhance my left-brain activity and make me use that part of my brain more. I actually like it.

    I really want to know what goes on in those logical brains. My mom is LSI and uneducated but I just see she is a logical type in her demeanor and they way she approaches problems. She can't even read or write English but when I see her wheels turning I just want to scream, "how do you think?". I did ask her that years ago and her response was, "I don't think in Greek anymore I think in English." I guess that was a logical response even though it wasn't an intellectual response so perhaps logical in socionics has less to do with actual intellect than I thought. On some of the visual right/left quizzes my mom views things from a balanced brain perspective. Meh this is something that has my brain whirling right now.
    That's interesting. I score balanced on these right/left tests too. Like, 55% right 45% left? Very close to 50/50. I don't think this is very directly related to logic per se because both hemispheres of the brain can do logic, just in different ways, but an interesting correlation if it does exist (from three samples it's hard to say).


    Quote Originally Posted by Galen View Post
    A predisposition towards intellectual understanding of received information over experiential synthesis.
    That's too generic a statement to use it to define strict logical thinking specifically. So no wonder @The Martrix was able to relate.

  38. #38
    The Iniquitous inumbra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    TIM
    954
    Posts
    5,989
    Mentioned
    70 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    25/45 "semi-rational"

    i missed questions 5, 9, 11, 12 and 15. i found question 9 impossibly hard and i don't understand it.

    i thought questions 1, 3, 4, 6, 7 and 8 (once you actually look at 8) were quite easy.


    a look at a few of them...

    2. A and B is the case if and only if B or C is the case. What must follow from this premise?

    B --> set A, B
    C --> set A, B

    where these are the only ways you can get set A, B

    If A, then B, and if B, then C.
    B or C, or ~B, or ~A, and if A, then C.
    If B, then C. Also, if B, then B.
    If B, then A. Also, if C, then A.
    i picked the right answer but i wasn't sure about it. the first three choices were obviously wrong though. my thoughts on this were that just because B or C exist doesn't necessarily mean that A does also, or that set A, B has arisen... we only really know that if we are seeing set A, B that we have B and/or C. in other words, i'm confused. maybe "is the case" is what's throwing me off.


    5. If someone says, "I killed all of the Gormagians," when is it logically true?

    It's logically true when all of the Gormagiaons are dead.
    well, just because they're all dead doesn't mean our "someone" killed all of them...

    It's logically true when I kill all of the Gormagians.
    i didn't know if we were taking "I" as the "someone"? there's also a tense issue... the tense is implying that "I" haven't killed them all yet... (i picked this one because i didn't know what else to pick.)

    It's logically true when Gormagians never existed.
    if they never existed, then how could our "someone" have killed them all?

    It's logically true when I kill the last Gormagian.
    this one is very similar to the second option, and i'm not sure it's significantly different from that option. that probably should have tipped me off that neither it or the second option can be the answer...

    anyway, i would have preferred "none of the above" for this one. obviously i don't understand what "logically true" means?


    10. Both ~A and B is equivalent to which of the following statements?

    Either ~A or ~B.
    i couldn't tell on this one. this would mean we can't have both ~A and ~B, which we don't. but i don't think this is close enough to be "equivalent"...

    Not either ~A or ~B.
    well, no. because we do have ~A.

    Not either ~A or B.
    no, because we have both.

    Not either A or ~B.
    i picked this one, but wasn't sure about it. it's true basically.


    11. If flangle and flingle, then flingle, then flangle, also means...

    flangle = A; flingle = B

    If A & B, then B, then A, also means...

    A & B
    A
    B and ~A
    ~B or ~A
    i selected the first one, which was wrong. i guess this is supposed to be a sequence, and at the end of the sequence we are left with flangle (A)?


    12. If X=Y, Y=Z, and X is the ancestor of Y, then...

    X gave rise to Y, and Y is exactly the same as X.

    X, Y, and Z are all their own ancestors.
    X is ancestor to Z, but Z is not ancestor to Y.
    Y is ancestor to Z and X, but not himself.
    Y and Z are the only ancestors of each other.
    i think i picked the second one. the last two are obviously wrong. i didn't like my choice and i have a problem with the first choice, or correct answer.

    i was thinking of X as basically giving rise to its clone, Y (where this clone is a perfect copy, and therefore is exactly the same as X (equal to X)). Z could be another clone X gave rise to, or it could be a clone Y gave rise to (in the same manner in which X gives rise to identical clones). so my issue with the first option is that although that could be true, i don't think it has to be true.


    15. Either ostriches eat engines or both ostriches eat engines and orangutans eat steering wheels if, and only if...

    either Os eat Es
    or both Os eat Es and Rs eat Ws
    if, and only if...

    Os eat Es.
    Os eat Es and Ws.
    Rs eat Ws and Os eat Es.
    Rs eat what Os eat.
    it's between the first option and the third (i selected the third). i think that mainly what this is, is that you can't have any of this if you don't have "Os eat Es." the causality of it falls apart without that. i guess?

  39. #39

    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    TIM
    LSI-Se sx
    Posts
    3,394
    Mentioned
    340 Post(s)
    Tagged
    25 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by McBain View Post
    41/45
    Congrats, come join the elite group that's so far only consisted of LxI types!

  40. #40
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    TIM
    SLE/LSE sx/sp
    Posts
    2,489
    Mentioned
    76 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    I don't sit no test.

    Logicks for sckoolz

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •