Are you ENFp or ESFp?
Suzzy's type
Are you ENFp or ESFp?
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Who me? Neither.Originally Posted by Maritsa33
The OP of this thread. You have already shown lack of Socionics knowledge and false typings of people. You are not much help.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Ah OK, thanks.
Although i'm tempted to ask you for examples, i'm equally tempted to say you could be right: it could explain why I type you as INFj.
You type Suzzy as INFj too; anyone you don't type as INFj?
In the video of her she kept refering to hidden agenda as to love or to be loved...and you ignor that...let's see that's like this right?
ENTp, ESTp => to be loved
INTp, ISTp => to love
And it's really not about that love either for them, it's more like to know that others are what they are to them...which is,
ESFp, ENFp => to know
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I've never stated my opinion on Suzzy's type on this forum, so I don't know where you get your information from. Although if i'm being co-erced, in my current opinion she's INFp.
I can only imagine the rest of your "examples" are equally fabricated, and i'd appreciate you stop spreading lies like that about me...if you can't stop thinking about them, I suppose.
Peace and all.
She's not INFp either; nothing about the way she looks, dresses, talks, eats, thinks, reacts emotionally, physically, mentally, is anything like any INFp; you just want to type everyone an N type.
ENTp, ESTp => to be loved
INTp, ISTp => to love
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Mmmmhhh.. I guess you don't get how offensive you are to say I that I have a lack of socionic knowledge, that i'm no help, then highlight this with an example I never said.
Although, I wonder if you even understand what those "HA's" mean. You could check out this thread.
I made a comment there.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
It looks as though you miss the point.
People may disagree over socionics, but to say that a) I have a lack of socionics knowledge, b) I display false typings, c) that i'm no use, then highlight it with one thing I never even said - and even if I did, people are allowed to disagree on something without being any of those things ... is a complete disrespect [and slander, since you can't even get your facts right about the other person in first place] you display to someone as a person, and imo - if you're worth anything, that is, the "feelings" [i've read some of your posts were you alude to being considerate, don't insult people and such] person you have claimed to be, you would apologise and withdraw your comment.
Of course - when it comes down to it, what you say either way has no bearing on me, I suppose you are just another fanatic who thinks that anyone who disagrees with you is therefore qualified as wrong, but I am curious if you ever relent and look at yourself and such.
great... another discussion about typing skills in a random tread
okay, here's a test for your knowledge of socionics; what does si polr look like or do?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
They have eyes that crave physical hardship and engage in endless autoflagellation.
IEE-Ne
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote