Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
Hah.. I don't get it. What I'd do that could invite 2 facepalms? I honestly don't understand Socionics, that's all. I'm trying to learn, but my definitions of Fi/Ne/Te/etc all are colored from elsewhere. I try to keep an open mind, but comments like the above just sort of pull the ground right from under whatever conception of Types I was standing on.
it's not you, it's just that......... please don't let what Maritsa says influence you too much. She has a very particular take on socionics, particularly interetype relations. I wouldn't take her seriously or take what she says as 'the nail in the coffin' about EII, or your type.
That's all.
So as you laern socionics, learn whose input to value, and who has a grasp of socionics that you would like to one day have yourself.
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.