http://www.cracked.com/blog/6-harsh-...better-person/
this is saying that "you only matter and can be happy if you're doing something useful"
do INFjs agree with this?
An article written by an ESTj? (Te)
http://www.cracked.com/blog/6-harsh-...better-person/
this is saying that "you only matter and can be happy if you're doing something useful"
do INFjs agree with this?
Not possible.
Maritsa is holding all of the LSEs in her duality dungeon.
Its too deep to run a wire or get wifi in there.
I couldn't relate to the article but it reminded me of something my sister sent me.
oops I'm not INFj, hmmph!
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
rah rah rah i am a real male u all suck rah rah rah <- essence of the article
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
no idea what he VIs like lol @Radio ..?
i dont like lists like that. cuz you can read a million of them and its not like theyre going to actually change your life. inspirational food for thought at most. but i didn't mind the message. well.. like how he says its not enough to just be "nice," its not that i agree with that, really..its just, what does nice mean? do you volunteer at homeless shelters? do you easily converse with everyone and make them feel good? what is NICE..? theres gotta be some kind of external reason that you're nice for anybody else to see the niceness in you.
it reminds me of the quote i have on my whiteboard at work right now (by an LSE, thomas edison): "do you want to know who you are? don't ask. act! action will delineate and define you."
so sure, i can believe this guy is LSE.
My SLE son just started dating an IEI!!!
I have been praying him to meet and date an IEI, and I know I have shared here on 16t that I really want him to meet and know a dual. (He doesn't know Socionics, or what a Dual is).
Well I have no doubt God hears and answers my prayers but I was expecting a long wait for this prayer to be answered. But God is so generous, and He knows the desires of my heart as well as my particular prayers, and the desire of my heart truly is for my son to be happy now. This is very new, a just-begun dating relationship. Yet, it feels to me like the start of something special. The timing is puzzling as we we are moving in 3 months, which my son has been just fine with, but, God has a plan, and only time will tell what that is. For now they are blessed with beginning a precious Duality friendship/relationship: comfortable, psychologically soothing and healing. It can only be good for them both.
And I am so encouraged that God so lovingly answered my prayers. My son being happy makes me happy.
Lol what a loser. The cognitive dissonance between his looks and his writing is simply astounding. He looks ENTj btw imho.Originally Posted by Radio
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
i got curious and googled him. this reminds me of ashton but the way ashton would talk about it is way different...
"So it occurred to me that both of these groups are identical — they both long for a post-apocalyptic world where, in the absence of civilization, their lives will finally have meaning. No more cubicles or memos or emails or politicians or political correctness, just a badass war of survival against a purely evil/inhuman enemy. And I thought that this innate destructive desire we have inside us, this subsurface longing to see society fall apart so that we can finally just be savage nomads again, was the scariest monster of all."
"But to me, Dunbar’s Number explained everything — organized religion, mythology, all human culture seemed to be a software workaround that humans wrote to overcome this limitation in our mental hardware. It seemed to me like you could turn on any news broadcast and see this limitation working against us, our physical inability to feel empathy for large groups, and kind of creating these simplistic pictures in our minds to cope with it all. The reason we’re obsessed with the apocalypse, for example, is we so badly want the world to be simple again. We’d rather scavenge through a wasteland with a dozen friends with shotguns than continue to do comfortable work for a corporation that employs 40,000 people."
http://www.followingthenerd.com/book...ong-interview/
oh and he apparently won some sarcastic "mangina" award from anti-feminists for being too cool about women?
http://queerfearscarewithatwist.blog...rd-winner.html
okay i think he is entx. my dual or my conflictor. lolz. what say u @lemontrees? (if you feel like it)
what the hell is that moving text Radio. Plz never use it anymore thx.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
Lol to these types of articles.
But um, I'm actually not sure what he is! I am going to lean towards thinking that he's a kind of distorted ENFj or ENFp- he seems extroverted and pushes to talk about big ideas/ makes conceptual ties, but doesn't seem to pull it all together with the logical confidence of an ENTp or ENTj. The emphasis seems more about using the emotion to carry the argument/ goad people into action; the intuition is there to show how "big" or crucial the things he's talking about are.
^Then again, I really, really have no idea... maybe I just don't agree with his "logic" and find him illogical lol.
Edit: I guess I can see ENTp.
Last edited by lemontrees; 04-02-2014 at 02:55 AM.
What he talks about is a somewhat stereotypical EJ view of the world, namely "things are what we see/measure they are and nothing more".
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
first i thought this thread would b boring but then it bcame kickass =>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>........
this guy is interesting. he makes some good points about post-apocalypse lovers. in case he's estj he's not one of the rly stiff ones
ESTj will describe to you the process of something happening that they observe to be efficient. For example my coworker ESTj was describing how a nonprofit mobil spay and nutur conducted. In his description he showed with his hand the motions of the process saying, "there was a line of about a hundred people, each holding their pets like this (he held this hands close to his chest as if he were holding his own small dog, kind of in a cuddley way), then each person walks in. They take the dog and bam, knock them out, and work on them fast. There is no after surgery care or anesthesia monitoring. They get the nutur done and put the dog on a recovery table for about half hour and wrap him up and send him home. With this process they did 10 or 20 quick, moving from one animal to another like bam bam bam." Of course watching him speak an LSE is highly concerned about quality so he is sure to mention things like "without anesthesia or after surgery monitoring" with an air or expression of judging. They don't say something like what I would say "well that isn't good" because I'm not afraid to make public judgements. They are more aware of social political pc stuff and being diplomatic, which I am not in certain situations. In close family situations I'm more diplomatic where as an LSE, being more confident there is a lot less so. So we are reversed but cover each others backs in our weak times.
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 04-03-2014 at 04:37 AM.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
This is not by LSE and No I don't agree.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Don't mind him, he's gay.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
