Hi folks, I'm Chris! I've been glancing at the wiki and trying to figure out my type!
Hoping to get along well with everyone!
Hi folks, I'm Chris! I've been glancing at the wiki and trying to figure out my type!
Hoping to get along well with everyone!
Hello
I'm sorry but when I see your username I am reading it as "whores a lot". Sometimes I have no filters...welcome.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Nope, the "h" was silent in my head. Yet I did get a sense of some kinda fantasy character, not LOTRs though. Maybe Arthurian Legend, "Sir Whores A Lot"
In Arthurian Legend there are many whores, not a bad thing...makes for interesting drama...No offence to op. I just go off on tangents.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Hi!! Welcome, and happy typing!
And if God cares so wonderfully for flowers that are here today and gone tomorrow, won't he more surely care for you?- Matthew 6:30
Hello.
Whore a sloth?
Hi. You can start by checking out the funtional descriptions in the blog listed in my signature
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html