Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Is there any validity to the Ennegram theory? split

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    398
    Mentioned
    221 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default Is there any validity to the Ennegram theory? split

    edited for gayness
    Last edited by n0ki; 11-03-2014 at 09:41 AM.

  2. #2
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Berlin
    TIM
    LSI 5w6 sx/so
    Posts
    5,421
    Mentioned
    144 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by silke View Post
    Yes, according to my observations instinct stackings form stronger 'attractors/repulsors' than socionics intertype relationships.
    and how do you view that, according to flows or independent of them?

    @ what Ath said : there's nothing scientific in either of them. Enneagram looks like some form of old wisdom, a tool to help you understand worldviews and motivations through simplifying them to a number of styles, that's all.
    * from my own experience, the best communication > with sp/so (who btw seem to not even consider factors of attraction and repulsion in their interaction with others and what they generally do), sx/sp and sp/sx
    Last edited by Amber; 02-15-2014 at 10:32 AM.

  3. #3
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Berlin
    TIM
    LSI 5w6 sx/so
    Posts
    5,421
    Mentioned
    144 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Is competition enough to make it science? Imo no. I said it simplifies through pushing people in a limited number of boxes, not that it is simple.

  4. #4
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Berlin
    TIM
    LSI 5w6 sx/so
    Posts
    5,421
    Mentioned
    144 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ath View Post
    bitch... editing your shout so you what you said was made consistent. Doesn't matter tho as it doesn't change the reality of the matter. Enneagram = useless, cult-like, overrated, pop-psych shit. Oldham, NPA and MOTIV all go for the research angle. Sure enneagram has a bit of that but its just insignificant decoration.
    wow, already projecting reasons onto me and name-calling ...I can assure you this has only to do with your human quality, not socionics or some other form of classifying people.

    PS : I edited to answer the OP question through that addition.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •