Is there any validity to the Ennegram theory? split
Last edited by n0ki; 11-03-2014 at 08:41 AM.
and how do you view that, according to flows or independent of them?
Originally Posted by silke
@ what Ath said : there's nothing scientific in either of them. Enneagram looks like some form of old wisdom, a tool to help you understand worldviews and motivations through simplifying them to a number of styles, that's all.
* from my own experience, the best communication > with sp/so (who btw seem to not even consider factors of attraction and repulsion in their interaction with others and what they generally do), sx/sp and sp/sx
Last edited by Amber; 02-15-2014 at 09:32 AM.
Is competition enough to make it science? Imo no. I said it simplifies through pushing people in a limited number of boxes, not that it is simple.
wow, already projecting reasons onto me and name-calling ...I can assure you this has only to do with your human quality, not socionics or some other form of classifying people.
Originally Posted by Ath
PS : I edited to answer the OP question through that addition.