Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Gatekeepers, Culminators, Stabilizers, Finalists

  1. #1
    Pookie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    TIM
    IEI-Ni 6w5-9-2 So/Sx
    Posts
    2,131
    Mentioned
    89 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Gatekeepers, Culminators, Stabilizers, Finalists

    http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...ng-and-Renewal

    At the bottom of this article, is lists out the aforementioned 4 roles that take place in each quadra. I've read before that Stabilizers act to balance out the excesses of the quadra, but i haven't been able to find a fully detailed out explanation of what these roles mean, or how each type ends up manifesting that role in their quadra.

    If anyone can explain the meaning of these roles and how they manifest in any particular quadra it would help explain alot.
    I would say that ethically you are still supposed to act as if you have unilateral responsibility; but simultaneously you have to be able to see the other as a fully autonomous, free, aware person.

    Medicalizing social problems has the additional benefit of rendering society not responsible for those social ills. If itís a disease, itís nobodyís fault. Yay empiricism.

  2. #2
    silke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    TIM
    Ni-IEI sx/sp
    Posts
    3,805
    Mentioned
    317 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    The reference for these four roles leads to this article: http://www.socioniko.net/ru/articles/quadral-est.html but it's not available in translated format. You can find more detailed descriptions in sections 4.1 "Intraquadral roles" and 4.2 "Chronological unraveling of quadra".

  3. #3
    Pookie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    TIM
    IEI-Ni 6w5-9-2 So/Sx
    Posts
    2,131
    Mentioned
    89 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Oh man. Won't load. Thanks though Silke Silky Smooth.
    I would say that ethically you are still supposed to act as if you have unilateral responsibility; but simultaneously you have to be able to see the other as a fully autonomous, free, aware person.

    Medicalizing social problems has the additional benefit of rendering society not responsible for those social ills. If itís a disease, itís nobodyís fault. Yay empiricism.

  4. #4
    silke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    TIM
    Ni-IEI sx/sp
    Posts
    3,805
    Mentioned
    317 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pookie View Post
    Oh man. Won't load. Thanks though Silke Silky Smooth.
    If you don't mind, I'll put up the article from your OP in automatic translation.

  5. #5
    Pookie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    TIM
    IEI-Ni 6w5-9-2 So/Sx
    Posts
    2,131
    Mentioned
    89 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Its all good.
    I would say that ethically you are still supposed to act as if you have unilateral responsibility; but simultaneously you have to be able to see the other as a fully autonomous, free, aware person.

    Medicalizing social problems has the additional benefit of rendering society not responsible for those social ills. If itís a disease, itís nobodyís fault. Yay empiricism.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •