Hi
Hi. I have read the theoretical part of socionics and while starting to understand the system, I'm becoming more and more interested in socionics. My type is LSI.
I find it difficult to type others. I joined this forum to learn more about the practical application of socionics.
I'm familiar with the enneagram and own a website about it.
hi
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Practical application... finding a partner who will have you. Maybe. No. Scratch that.
Convincing impressionable people you're psychic
Last edited by rat1; 01-25-2014 at 12:35 PM.
Hey I edited that. Changed my mind. But you are creepy.
I think I know you . and your site . oh hi btwOriginally Posted by Dutchman
Yes, analysing texts is what I want to learn. I don't mind being typed, thanks.
Added the link as Home Page in My Profile.
Nice to have so many quick replies.
^^^^ i´ve come across him around fb socionics groups. he´s likely LSI-Se , taking his photo into account , too
Hi, hello, welcome... going to check out your site.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Oh... you're being equivocal. I suppose you think that's brillaint
Yawn. Go away.
Dear Dutchman... May I please VI you?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
This is kinda sweet, to me.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Yes.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
