Emily Blunt
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALnbesSQ-bo
If you have time to watch the video it is interesting how she behaves with Russell. Activity? dual? conflictor?
(I like watching this show because it's a chance to see celebs in a more relaxed and intimate setting where they get to act like themselves and seem like real people, don't care much for the host, but whatever).
Last edited by silke; 01-16-2019 at 07:45 PM. Reason: updated links
I'm not sure about her at all.
Total LSI.
I find her to be super corny.. but still like her. she's fairly likable.
I don't know. She could be an NF
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
good god woman, she's definitely not NF.
She looks like my ILE friend but she's probably not an ILE. My ILE friend figures out what you're going to say before you say it and she's sometimes doesn't making eye contact during conversations, most of the time, especially when she's figuring out what you're saying. Um. This girl is an S type because she's really looking at what you're saying and reacting to it. She could very well be an SEE
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Emily Blunt - LSI
Russell Brand - EIE
I would say they're a very good example of Beta duality... the sort of duality you have that starts with a Russian Revolution and ends with an icepick to the head.
Paloma Faith - SEI
Graham Norton - SEI
I do this all the time.Originally Posted by Maritsa
I really see a lot of myself in her (eeeck) so I say LSI
Her husband is imo IEI
looooove them together
She looks a lot like a couple of girls I know who I figure to be Beta rational. One of them I just knew to be EIE, but i suppose LSI is possible. I'm starting to figure out that I've gotten Beta rational females mixed up in the past. So I'd say Beta rational for Blunt, and someone wiser than me can say whether she is LSI or EIE.
LSI LSI LSI
She is one of my lady crushes.call me crushed.
LSI smiles are so radiant though, like even with the iciness.
yeah, she's eerily similar to me lol it's kinda awkward to watch.
ipsa scientia potestas est-adaequatio intellectus et rei
She looks in photos a lot like one EIE girl I know, but she is less "expansive" and acts more like the LSI I know. So my bet is Beta rational, LSI.
(very similar impression to @Contra's post.)
Interesting. I join to the group of people who sometimes mix up beta rationals. I'm sure I've done this mistake more than once IRL.
I have a mental image of what a LSI woman should be and it's something like Hillary Clinton or Sharon Stone. Both of them display enough Se (and they have a creative-Se focused gaze). But the less Se-evident LSIs could project a quite introspective aura to the point of being misunderstood as intuitives, particularly as Ni-EIEs (they still lack the skill for promoting emotional states in others).
Could this be an enneagram thing? Or maybe an instictual stacking, being the "classical" LSIs so[sx]-first, and the "atypical" ones sp-first? (enneagram pundits could contribute here, I have never paid too much attention to stackings).
Here is (imo) another example of these quasi-EIE LSIs: Spanish politician Tania Sanchez from Izquierda Unida (United Left):
tania--644x362.JPG8549532_300x300.jpg
She's passionate and definitely rational, but her argumentations tends to be logic-based (or at least logically articulated, because they're full of questionable ideology). Her ex-boyfriend, by the other hand, is closer to a typical EIE: Pablo Iglesias, the infamous leader of the Spanish radical-left party Podemos (We can), which is full of betas, by the way:
1399569896_077942_1399581512_noticia_normal.jpg1416069106292.jpgEl-lider-de-Podemos-Pablo-Igle_54417260770_54028874188_960_639.jpg
His speeches are commonly oriented to cause strong emotional reactions in people.
Last edited by MensSuperMateriam; 04-21-2015 at 03:49 PM.
It's crazy how different Canada's political scene is from Spain apparently. There is no way, Canada would freeze over permanently, before a women with a lip piercing and a long haired hippy man wearing hemp bracelets would ever in a million years ever be elected as a high ranking government official.
The passionate speeches aimed at emotional reactions just don't fly here at all. Podemos sounds like a rip off of Barak Obama's "Yes We Can".
About the softer LSI. I think this is a an oft miss conception about LSI. Many of them are actually kind of dorky and goofy.
Se creative ..not necessarily LSI.
...though I know many women who come up in threads are very physically similar to MissB.Doll in her opinion ...even the late Ruslana Korshunova, an obvious Ethical type.
She's lovely. I've seen the LSI typing for her for some time and haven't really decided she is LSI, only that I haven't seen why she is not.
She reminds me of a friend I made recently who finds me more interesting than I think she should and who just lent a mutual friend 4,000 dollars to save a pet cat even though she herself hates cats. All I know for her type is IXTx.
Since when has Canada become the new Texas? Just kidding. I guess in Anglo-Saxon culture it's extremely important to project an image of professionalism and efficiency, as it's a heavily Te-based culture. Here it's also important, but not so critical. Also the main target of these two politicians, particularly in the case of Iglesias and his Podemos party as a whole, is young people.
By the way, none of these two are (still) high ranking government officials; Tania Sanchez was only member of the parliament in one of the main administrative divisions (from a minor party, not the ruling one); Pablo Iglesias is the head of Podemos party, but he hasn't been elected for an official institution yet, although his party has achieved minor sucess in some recent elections.
Makes sense.The passionate speeches aimed at emotional reactions just don't fly here at all.
The motto [party name] is similar, but the core is very different. Imo Obama's style and area of influence is mainly democratic (quadra) in nature. He seems to promote optimism, positive feelings, and to certain extent, soft indealism, based in a set of goals assumed good for everyone. Podemos is heavily artistocratic, the underlying idea is not simply to achieve better things as it is to destroy "evil and evil people", maybe not in the physical sense, but in the political one. They want to break the system (at least partially) for "bringing their own", even if in the latter days they're strongly moderating their speech in order to gain more support from less radical people. They have a strong division us vs them, using a despective term for their assumed enemies: "la casta" (the class, more or less).Podemos sounds like a rip off of Barak Obama's "Yes We Can".
Maybe you're right, but I still think goofy is not a particularly fitting label for them. Dorky maybe, in some cases.About the softer LSI. I think this is a an oft miss conception about LSI. Many of them are actually kind of dorky and goofy.
Last edited by MensSuperMateriam; 04-21-2015 at 06:11 PM.
actually I'm inclined to go Ti/Fe after reading some more stuff she said :
Americans are a lot more open, of course. There's something more declamatory in the way you express emotions. It's a stereotype but it's true. British people can appear repressed in expressing emotions. Not very good at self-evaluating, or affirming situations, touching, anything like that.
(stereotyping about whole cultures is Beta "aristocracy")
When you're in love, you're so happy that you want to tell people about it. But now I have to censor myself. You need to protect the happiness you have.
The performances I enjoy are the ones that are hard to read or ambiguous or left-of-centre because it makes you look closer and that's what humans are like - quite mysterious creatures, hard to pinpoint.
(people ain't that mysterious to ESI)
I'm not someone who likes to plan too much ahead.
(not N)
I'm kind of effectively bipolar.
but in this pic in particular she VIs a bit like Pina Bausch and her looks are not distinctively T (there's some sort of sweetness and impression of "fragility" to her that I can't usually see in LSIs)
LSI.
I have a mental image of what a LSI woman should be and it's something like Hillary Clinton or Sharon Stone. Both of them display enough Se (and by the way, they have a creative-Se focused gaze). But the less Se-evident LSIs could project a quite introspective aura to the point of being misunderstood as intuitives, particularly as Ni-EIEs (they still lack the skill for promoting emotional states in others).
Could this be an enneagram thing? Or maybe an instictual stacking, being the "classical" LSIs so[sx]-first, and the "atypical" ones sp-first? (enneagram pundits could contribute here, I have never paid too much attention to stackings).
she's probably E6 (not cp) so/sx
I think she's ILE-Ti subtype, can seem LSI ish but more fragile.
Ice princess vibe but she's a softie at heart.
Intimidated her husband John Krasinski(SEI) out the gate.
http://www.yourtango.com/2012166855/...fe-emily-blunt
Various things make me think they have a dual relationship
http://www.mtv.com/news/2051367/john...ly-blunt-love/
Emily Blunt could be LSI too, that's the only other type I would really consider, but mmm my identical-radar tells me ILE.
UPDATE
Thought she was ESI but changed to SLE
Last edited by vesstheastralsilky; 02-06-2019 at 10:14 PM.
~* astralsilky
Each essence is a separate glass,
Through which Sun of Being’s Light is passed,
Each tinted fragment sparkles with the Sun,
A thousand colors, but the Light is One.
Jami, 15th c. Persian Poet
Post types & fully individuated before 2012 ...
Seems IJ and Se. Would go with LSI>ESI
LSI. I don't really like her acting and she seems like merry from her irl persona.
bump
IEI
LSI are snobs. ESI are too, but hide this
John Krasinski - ESE
Emily Blunt - ESI
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
