1. ## Type Scapegrace!

What could Scapegrace type be? She says "ill" but she seems well enough to me. I think we should try to figure this out.

Here are my ideas. So if you have no idea at all, perhaps these will give you a start. If you are a Process type vs. result type, my result-first process will drive you crazy, so, might best skip down to the conclusion and agree or disregard):

There is a 6.5% chance she is any one of each of the 16 types.

I had her confused with ESI-Blackberry, until she or someone straightened me out. There is a chance that I got them confused because I saw them as similar. I don't know. I am confused. So based on that scrap of the chance that this is the reason I had them confused, I would say there is a 10% or more chance that she is an ESI.

Here is another scrap of info that lends to possible typing: Her Avatar is mindful of Anndelise's. Look:
Scapegrace:http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...tar1871_18.gif

Anndelise: http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...vatar387_2.gif

(I meant to post them side by side here but I don't know how to).

So, look at that. They could be same or similar types. The pic looks Ti-valuing to me. Anndelise knows I think she is SEE, and she does not agree, but she can come up with her own theory on why she and Scapegrace have similar avatars. But based on MY theory, that could make Scapegrace a SEE. 10% sure!

Being a Negativist, I can eliminate some. Don't ask me to explain please, its just my intuition (also basing this on comparing to people of these types I do know well, and not having seen a resemblance with them):
- not IEE
- not SLI
- not LSE
- not EII
- not SEI
- not ILE
- not ESE
- not ILI

that narrows it down, for me, to only 8 type possibilities. So a 12.5% chance of those. So I will change the above percentages, downgrade a bit though since I might have the eliminations off, and conclude the following:

Scapegrace is ESI - 15% sure
Scapegrace is SEE - 15% sure
Scapegrace is LIE, SLE, IEI, LIE, LSI, EIE -11.7% sure

2. Are you seriously suggesting that you cannot perceive a difference between
vs

??

3. ILI

4. EIE

5. LOL

6. Ann, she's not looking at the specific, she's just looking at the shape and representation. The two are sideways view of a human skull, that they are both the same view and orientation, and are of a human is what she sees, she doesn't see the specifics like COLOR, the type of skulls they are, one is more abstract the other more medical.

7. Originally Posted by Maritsa
Ann, she's not looking at the specific, she's just looking at the shape and representation. The two are sideways view of a human skull, that they are both the same view and orientation, and are of a human is what she sees, she doesn't see the specifics like COLOR, the type of skulls they are, one is more abstract the other more medical.
this analysis is priceless.

8. Originally Posted by Eliza Thomason
What could Scapegrace type be? She says "ill" but she seems well enough to me. I think we should try to figure this out.

Here are my ideas. So if you have no idea at all, perhaps these will give you a start. If you are a Process type vs. result type, my result-first process will drive you crazy, so, might best skip down to the conclusion and agree or disregard):

There is a 6.5% chance she is any one of each of the 16 types.

I had her confused with ESI-Blackberry, until she or someone straightened me out. There is a chance that I got them confused because I saw them as similar. I don't know. I am confused. So based on that scrap of the chance that this is the reason I had them confused, I would say there is a 10% or more chance that she is an ESI.

Here is another scrap of info that lends to possible typing: Her Avatar is mindful of Anndelise's. Look:
Scapegrace:http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...tar1871_18.gif

Anndelise: http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...vatar387_2.gif

(I meant to post them side by side here but I don't know how to).

So, look at that. They could be same or similar types. The pic looks Ti-valuing to me. Anndelise knows I think she is SEE, and she does not agree, but she can come up with her own theory on why she and Scapegrace have similar avatars. But based on MY theory, that could make Scapegrace a SEE. 10% sure!

Being a Negativist, I can eliminate some. Don't ask me to explain please, its just my intuition (also basing this on comparing to people of these types I do know well, and not having seen a resemblance with them):
- not IEE
- not SLI
- not LSE
- not EII
- not SEI
- not ILE
- not ESE
- not ILI

that narrows it down, for me, to only 8 type possibilities. So a 12.5% chance of those. So I will change the above percentages, downgrade a bit though since I might have the eliminations off, and conclude the following:

Scapegrace is ESI - 15% sure
Scapegrace is SEE - 15% sure
Scapegrace is LIE, SLE, IEI, LIE, LSI, EIE -11.7% sure

SG is ILI.

9. Originally Posted by Maritsa
Ann, she's not looking at the specific, she's just looking at the shape and representation. The two are sideways view of a human skull, that they are both the same view and orientation, and are of a human is what she sees, she doesn't see the specifics like COLOR, the type of skulls they are, one is more abstract the other more medical.
Are you joking? I hope you two actually know that avatars have nothing to do with someone's type...

10. Scape's avatar is a cry for Se

11. *enters room*

she's an identity crisis drama queen who gets mad when you ignore her, and does everything in her power to convince everyone she's more intelligent than she actually is.

eie

Let me know when everyone has finally realized how right I am.

*walks backwards out the door*

12. She is a hyper intelligent INFj. So smart. So humanist. So emotion.

13. Originally Posted by Narc
She is a hyper intelligent INFj. So smart. So humanist. So emotion.
lmao

Sometimes duals look like identicals.

/trollz

Sometimes my dick looks like your ass when its wedged in your anus.

15. Eliza, you're just generally confused. You seem to involve yourself in such mixups with alarming frequency.

Also: your math is extremely fucked up. What is that up there? Estonian economics?

I'm 100.2% sure that I have no socionics type.

I SEE I SEEEEEE

I SEE, You SEE, We all SEE for SEE Cream.

wait, wut? I scream, you scream, we all scream for ice cream? I am so confused. HOW DO I INTUIT?

Sometimes I think about thinking about looking at pictures of coffee online.

17. Let's mind connect in 3... 2... 1

18. Originally Posted by DJ Arendee
*enters room*

she's an identity crisis drama queen who gets mad when you ignore her, and does everything in her power to convince everyone she's more intelligent than she actually is.

eie

Let me know when everyone has finally realized how right I am.

*walks backwards out the door*
Says the vain asshole with an obnoxious / incoherent youtube channel about himself.

Projecting much?

I need to watch that movie again v_v
It's a classic.

20. Originally Posted by blackburry
SG is ILI.
Okay, 80%

21. Originally Posted by Scapegrace
Sometimes I think about thinking about looking at pictures of coffee online.
(Values Si)
(Or would you call this TiSi?)

Originally Posted by Scapegrace
Also: your math is extremely f___ed up. What is that up there? Estonian economics?

Originally Posted by Scapegrace
I'm 100.2% sure that I have no socionics type.
(Not a socionicsist).

22. Originally Posted by Eliza Thomason
Does anyone LIKE bad math? Especially when it's being used to try and prove a point?

23. Originally Posted by FoxOnStilts
Does anyone LIKE bad math? Especially when it's being used to try and prove a point?
Well, I don't know if 10% makes a strong point for anything...

Youre not very good at implicit meaning :/ Pls dont get mugged.
Hey, I do my best.

25. This is the most peculiar typing thread I have seen in a long time.

26. Originally Posted by Kim
This is the most peculiar typing thread I have seen in a long time.

wow, really? do you have to bring drama to every single thread you come across? I'm appalled at your behavior lately and I think I'll be taking this up with some of the real mods,
once they get out of my bed. *bg, can you get the tailbone while youre down there? mmm yah, thas what im talking bout*

27. Sometimes people are just enlightened by a computer screen.

28. This thread goes beyond the beyond. Is Eliza a secret troll? Am beginning to wonder if this is a possibility. There is about zero percent sense in the Op, being generous with good maths.

This is a typical conversation for typing means

Person: *says something not SEE*

Eliza: 'oh they don't like bad math'

Person: * says something else not SEE*

Eliza: 'not a socionicsist'

Person: *says soemthign that could be vaguely related to a function*

Eliza: 'Oh that's it, you are this type! because you remind of some other person who I have typed based on something random that had nothing to do with socionics either!'

Eliza come on... you really are sounding just about as crackpot as Maritsa. Apologies for mocking tone, I am desperately trying to show you how skewed this all is.

Edit: You have strted this thread for drama, honestly.

29. Originally Posted by Geminatronix
This thread goes beyond the beyond.
That's certainly beyond expectations.

30. Originally Posted by Eliza Thomason
What could Scapegrace type be? She says "ill" but she seems well enough to me. I think we should try to figure this out.

Here are my ideas. So if you have no idea at all, perhaps these will give you a start. If you are a Process type vs. result type, my result-first process will drive you crazy, so, might best skip down to the conclusion and agree or disregard):

There is a 6.5% chance she is any one of each of the 16 types.

I had her confused with ESI-Blackberry, until she or someone straightened me out. There is a chance that I got them confused because I saw them as similar. I don't know. I am confused. So based on that scrap of the chance that this is the reason I had them confused, I would say there is a 10% or more chance that she is an ESI.

Here is another scrap of info that lends to possible typing: Her Avatar is mindful of Anndelise's. Look:
Scapegrace:http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...tar1871_18.gif

Anndelise: http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...vatar387_2.gif

(I meant to post them side by side here but I don't know how to).

So, look at that. They could be same or similar types. The pic looks Ti-valuing to me. Anndelise knows I think she is SEE, and she does not agree, but she can come up with her own theory on why she and Scapegrace have similar avatars. But based on MY theory, that could make Scapegrace a SEE. 10% sure!

Being a Negativist, I can eliminate some. Don't ask me to explain please, its just my intuition (also basing this on comparing to people of these types I do know well, and not having seen a resemblance with them):
- not IEE
- not SLI
- not LSE
- not EII
- not SEI
- not ILE
- not ESE
- not ILI

that narrows it down, for me, to only 8 type possibilities. So a 12.5% chance of those. So I will change the above percentages, downgrade a bit though since I might have the eliminations off, and conclude the following:

Scapegrace is ESI - 15% sure
Scapegrace is SEE - 15% sure
Scapegrace is LIE, SLE, IEI, LIE, LSI, EIE -11.7% sure

31. I've decided that I'm SEE for sure.

Want to see my boobs?

32. What does it mean that my avatar is all sepia, and old tech, and dead, but Ann's is all sci-fi, and glowy, and alive?

My type threads are never this exciting.

Please excuse me a minute. I feel a little.... verklemmt.
You just need more enemies who are determined to retype you.

34. Aw, @Geminatronix, I really am just being silly. I am really only being half serious. Or 10% serious. The rest is just me mocking my own admittedly random typing method, which is too hard to put into words (even though I have tried!). Lots of people know Scape better than me so really I just was going to observe what others said and let the thread run about in every off-topic manner. Plus I thought I would make an admittedly useless attempt to explain my explainable typing method, which is a silly thing to attempt.

I actually don't like drama. Taking a 10% serious approach to typing is sort of an antidote to that, and to my own overly-serious approach to typing, and to other things that I take far too serious much of the time.

Also I could never name types of a whole forum of people. Not saying others cannot do it with some degree of accuracy; I do not rule that out, but, not me. The only way I could do it is the way I did in this thread. And I'd be right, too - 10% of the time*...

*Which you must admit is an improvement of 6.5%

My type threads are never this exciting.

Please excuse me a minute. I feel a little.... verklemmt.
Well, you should be more of a self absorbed drama queen in the midst of an identity crisis.

36. Originally Posted by Scapegrace
What does it mean that my avatar is all sepia, and old tech, and dead, but Ann's is all sci-fi, and glowy, and alive?
Yes, I am curious, too. It must have some meaning. Uh, Ann is bright, glow-y alive; Scape is - - oh nevermind.

37. I'm dull.

38. Originally Posted by Eliza Thomason
Yes, I am curious, too. It must have some meaning. Uh, Ann is bright, glow-y alive; Scape is - - oh nevermind.
Eliza, Ne will come up with a kazillion random explanations instantly. Some may be off but most will be at least interesting. This is one of the reasons I am considering you are not Ne role function. You just looked ta the avatars and went 'similar' without actually looking for meaning, the meanings behind the avatars. This is certainly not something I (or the majority of people on the forum and especially those with Ne base function) would do. I honestly can not think of a single IEE who would do that, let alone make a thread about it.

39. Originally Posted by Scapegrace
I'm dull.
Or, you are really one of the most colorful and exciting persons on this forum, but for some scurrilous reason, you feel a need to disguise that with a sepia-toned avatar.

40. Originally Posted by Geminatronix
Eliza, Ne will come up with a kazillion random explanations... most will be at least interesting.... This is one of the reasons I am considering you are not ...[IEE]
Omigosh LOL this is good and I am going to put it in quotable quotes I saw here somewhere.

Eliza = "Too dull" to be IEE.

(Sepia = dull =Scapegrace = not-IEE. Thanks for they typing tips Gem. )

Page 1 of 3 123 Last

#### Posting Permissions

• You may not post new threads
• You may not post replies
• You may not post attachments
• You may not edit your posts
•