Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: What do you think about this (Enneagram-Socionics correlation chart)

  1. #1
    retired
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    europe
    TIM
    Se
    Posts
    169
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default What do you think about this (Enneagram-Socionics correlation chart)

    .
    Last edited by nigh; 07-08-2014 at 03:58 AM.

  2. #2
    fka lungs ashlesha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    TIM
    Fi/Te 6 sp/sx
    Posts
    13,176
    Mentioned
    678 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    i'm curious how he determined any correlations between socionics type and instinct stacking but he's not here to ask.
    what's your take - does it make sense to you beyond aligning with your self type?

  3. #3
    retired
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    europe
    TIM
    Se
    Posts
    169
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    .
    Last edited by nigh; 07-08-2014 at 03:58 AM.

  4. #4
    Seriously Judicious Emotivist Eliza Thomason's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    eastern U.S.
    TIM
    ENFp, IEE
    Posts
    2,532
    Mentioned
    236 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Int = sx ? And the chart shows only what is their first, sx, so, sp?

  5. #5
    retired
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    europe
    TIM
    Se
    Posts
    169
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    .
    Last edited by nigh; 07-08-2014 at 03:58 AM.

  6. #6
    retired
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    europe
    TIM
    Se
    Posts
    169
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    .
    Last edited by nigh; 07-08-2014 at 03:59 AM.

  7. #7
    retired
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    europe
    TIM
    Se
    Posts
    169
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    .
    Last edited by nigh; 07-08-2014 at 03:59 AM.

  8. #8
    Airman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,555
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Some of the things make sense, others don't.

    I have far more experience with Enneagram, I know it since 2000.

    imo here's a possibly good correlation of most likely socionics types for E-types

    TYPE 1: (excludes Fe on egoblock Types).
    TYPE 2: (excludes leading-Si. Most likely types are INFJ, ISFJ, ENFP; but NOT ENFJ)
    TYPE 3: ENTJ, ESTJ more common (Te on egoblock or Fe on egoblock types)
    TYPE 4: easiest, INFP, ENFJ, ESFJ, ESFP are most likely
    TYPE 5: All Introverts are possible, rarely Extroverts.
    TYPE 6: Any type is possible. Likely ISTJ, ESTJ, ISTP, ESTP, INTJ, INTP.
    TYPE 7: All types with Fe on egoblock plus types with Se-leading, ESFP, ESTP.
    TYPE 8: ESTJ, ESTP, ISTJ, ESFJ most likely.
    TYPE 9: ISTP most likely, ISFP also likely, also the Extroverted types with Si on egoblock ESFJ, ESTJ are not unlikely. INTJ likely too, but not INTP.

  9. #9
    Pookie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    TIM
    IEI-Ni 6w5-9-2 So/Sx
    Posts
    2,262
    Mentioned
    94 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    IEI but im a 6.

    So, am i wrong?
    Projection is ordinary. Person A projects at person B, hoping tovalidate something about person A by the response of person B. However, person B, not wanting to be an obejct of someone elses ego and guarding against existential terror constructs a personality which protects his ego and maintain a certain sense of a robust and real self that is different and separate from person A. Sadly, this robust and real self, cut off by defenses of character from the rest of the world, is quite vulnerable and fragile given that it is imaginary and propped up through external feed back. Person B is dimly aware of this and defends against it all the more, even desperately projecting his anxieties back onto person A, with the hope of shoring up his ego with salubrious validation. All of this happens without A or B acknowledging it, of course. Because to face up to it consciously is shocking, in that this is all anybody is doing or can do and it seems absurd when you realize how pathetic it is.

  10. #10
    Local Hero Saberstorm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Isle of Man
    TIM
    Robespierre
    Posts
    2,063
    Mentioned
    56 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Why are we using Meyers/Briggs types? When you say INTJ and INTP I do not know if you mean Balzac or Robespierre? Please use Socionics terminology. (I ask nicely.)
     
    God is most glorified when we are most satisfied in Him.
    - John Piper


    Socionics -
    the16types.info

  11. #11
    retired
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    europe
    TIM
    Se
    Posts
    169
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    .
    Last edited by nigh; 07-08-2014 at 03:59 AM.

  12. #12
    Airman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,555
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Saberstorm View Post
    Why are we using Meyers/Briggs types? When you say INTJ and INTP I do not know if you mean Balzac or Robespierre? Please use Socionics terminology. (I ask nicely.)
    I'm using four captioned letters because it is obviously not MBTI . Imo this simple chart I made is very consistent.

  13. #13
    Airman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,555
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pookie View Post
    IEI but im a 6.

    So, am i wrong?
    No, this is definitely a good typing. IEI and E6 go along well.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •