Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 128

Thread: Associative Socionics Test by Olga Tangemann

  1. #1
    Olga's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    1,596
    Mentioned
    36 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Lightbulb Associative Socionics Test by Olga Tangemann

    Socionics’ Colour Test (SCT)
    This test defines your personality type. It was created by the founder of Associative socionics - psychologist and author Tangemann O.B.
    A revolutionary non-verbal method of psycho-diagnostics is based on the associative theory of colour- and music preferences with the reference to psychophysiology. It opens a new chapter in objective scientific testing and understanding personality types from the perspective of subconscious preferences.

    http://aeterna.qip.ru/user/1748845/tests/

    Olga Tangemann 2013 © Associative Socionics

    Please, do not get overexcited about this test as non-verbal part is relatively small. Colours and colour combinations attached through the theory to dichotomies as you know if you have read my articles and know the concept of associative socionics.

    It is the very first associative test translated in English. They will be more tests later and they will be mainly or fully non-verbal in the future. Some of them will determine not just the type but also psychodynamics which is in the from of a personality profile or TPE profile, type and subtype.

    Please, help me with statistics of this test. Do this test not once but 3 times within the break and let me know the results like this:

    1) State you name or nickname on this forum
    2) State your original type and then the results of this test.

    You can send it in private messaging to me if you wish to keep your type secret on this forum. I will code then you name.
    And of course I would be glad to hear your feedback about this test.

    Kind regards,
    Olga
    School of Associative socionics: http://socionics4you.com/

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    18,006
    Mentioned
    162 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Got LSE...

  3. #3
    Olga's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    1,596
    Mentioned
    36 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Thanks, Absurd!
    School of Associative socionics: http://socionics4you.com/

  4. #4
    ragnar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    TIM
    ILI
    Posts
    634
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Olga View Post
    Socionics’ Colour Test (SCT)
    http://aeterna.qip.ru/user/1748845/tests/ Olga Tangemann 2013 © Associative Socionics
    Took the test 3 times, tried to answer as differently as possible each time while keeping the answers correct within my subjective judgement:

    1.YOUR TYPE IS: SENSORY EMOTIONAL INTROVERT Dumas. SEI
    2.YOUR TYPE IS: INLUITIVE LOGIC INTROVERT Balzac. ILI
    3.YOUR TYPE IS: INLUITIVE LOGIC INTROVERT Balzac. ILI
    Greetings, ragnar
    ILI knowledge-seeker

  5. #5
    Roro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    TIM
    6 sp
    Posts
    999
    Mentioned
    28 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Took it twice because there were a few I didn't know which answer to choose. Got the same result both times. Shrug.


    YOUR TYPE IS: INLUITIVE LOGIC INTROVERT
    Balzac. ILI have the ability to abstract and philosophical thinking, noticing contradictions in conclusions and pointing them to others (critics). There is always logical reasoning behind their conclusions. ILI are able to see the ways to get the profit, often they do not take the opportunity. They are naturally sceptical and can pour the cold water on someone whom they believe to be overenthusiastic. ILI are often sceptical about themselves and their own potential too. They appear to be shy, reserved and unenthusiastic

  6. #6
    Kim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    TIM
    IEE e7 783 sx so
    Posts
    6,857
    Mentioned
    380 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    IEE
    “Let us forget with generosity those who cannot love us”
    ― Pablo Neruda

  7. #7
    dugga dugga dun Narc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    TIM
    Ni-ENTj 8w9 sx/sp
    Posts
    1,288
    Mentioned
    101 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    I got ILI.

  8. #8
    lump's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    TIM
    Fi/Te 6 sp/sx
    Posts
    12,596
    Mentioned
    631 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Dumas. SEI enjoy being in and create a conflict-free and relaxed emotional atmosphere. Minimizing negative emotions is more important for them than experiencing the positive emotions. The Hedonists are very good at making the surroundings cosy, the food healthy and tasty and the atmosphere positive and low-key. They are very at any time of their body position, how the touch of the cloth feels or whether the temperature around them is comfortable. Smells, touches, tastes - that is how they perceive the reality around them. SEI can enjoy comfortable position and relaxed atmosphere for hours, whether that is sitting on the warm sand watching the ocean, feeling the wind on their skin, watching the waves or sitting in a chair by the fire, enjoying the warmth of the flames. Their mood and activity level depends highly on their health and comfort - if they are uncomfortable or have, for example, a headache - that would be sufficient to put them off their stride

  9. #9
    A dusty and dreadful charade. Scapegrace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    TIM
    ill
    Posts
    3,055
    Mentioned
    169 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I got: YOUR TYPE IS: INLUITIVE LOGIC INTROVERT.

    I don't think taking it three times in quick succession would be very useful.
    "[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan

    Brought to you by socionix.com

  10. #10
    senza's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    TIM
    4w5
    Posts
    300
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I got SEI.

  11. #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    18,006
    Mentioned
    162 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    LUL.

  12. #12
    Olga's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    1,596
    Mentioned
    36 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Dear all,
    thanks for trying out the test. It has a very positive feedback on facebook in MBTI group and I started to collect statistics:

    your name - your original type - your test results - yes or no

    Yes or no means do you agree or disagree with the result of the test. It is just for easy visual identification of the right and wrong result. ) So far I have feedback from 16 people who did the test honestly. 50% got their own type, from the rest only 6% got the result which differ on more than one preference. I did not consider yet your results but I will have a look now.
    .
    School of Associative socionics: http://socionics4you.com/

  13. #13
    Olga's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    1,596
    Mentioned
    36 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Shayley View Post
    Results:
    IEE
    IEE
    LII
    Hi Shayley, there is definetly consistency in your result as regards to IEE type. Is it your original type as you think? I got a feeling that the last result was more or less an experiment to try to change the answers, it is very different from IEE. All results suggest that statics preference is very strong compared to extraversion and irrationality if you would be an irrational extraverted type.
    School of Associative socionics: http://socionics4you.com/

  14. #14
    Olga's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    1,596
    Mentioned
    36 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ragnar View Post
    Took the test 3 times, tried to answer as differently as possible each time while keeping the answers correct within my subjective judgement:

    1.YOUR TYPE IS: SENSORY EMOTIONAL INTROVERT Dumas. SEI
    2.YOUR TYPE IS: INLUITIVE LOGIC INTROVERT Balzac. ILI
    3.YOUR TYPE IS: INLUITIVE LOGIC INTROVERT Balzac. ILI
    I am not sure what exactly happened in the first result but the two last ones fit your original one which could be considered as success. ILI. The consistency is on the behalf of your type and also on the behalf of your leading TPE - Superid. What do you think about the test so far?
    School of Associative socionics: http://socionics4you.com/

  15. #15
    Olga's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    1,596
    Mentioned
    36 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I believe that Roro is an ILI and got twice the right result for himself? I will add this information to statisitcs, thank you!

    So Kim also got her result right did the test once.

    Narc has one preference different - LIE - LII. Well, it could be that the test result show the subtype but not type. This happens sometimes.)

    Lungs, you have SEI as the result and in your profile is ESI. What is your type? Do you agree with the description of SEI. does it fit you better than the description of ESI type?

    Scapegrace, did you get your result right? You sound logical and negative, so I think the result could be authentic for you...may be)

    Derpface, I see again the same shift from ESI to SEI and think that the reason must be a strong introversion preference compared to rationality and statics like for lungs too. I mean, that it may happen that the test shows actually not your type but subtype. If you and Lungs would do the test 3 times I could have a better idea what is going on. What do you think about the description of SEI, does it fit you well?

    For example in case of ragnar his first result was quite different frim the other two and could be misleading about his type.
    School of Associative socionics: http://socionics4you.com/

  16. #16
    when you see the booty Galen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    everywhere at once
    Posts
    8,449
    Mentioned
    203 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I got ILE
    "And above all, watch with glittering eyes the whole world around you because the greatest secrets are always hidden in the most unlikely places. Those who don't believe in magic will never find it." -Roald Dahl

    http://forum.socionix.com/
    It's pretty cool

  17. #17
    Olga's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    1,596
    Mentioned
    36 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I have prepared the statisitcs of your results. Please, check it out and correct me, if I am wrong:

    Ragnar –ILI –SEI –ILI-ILI – Yes
    Kim – IEE –IEE – Yes
    Shayley – IEE –IEE-IEE-LII – Yes
    Roro – ILI –ILI – Yes
    Narc – LIE –LII – No
    Lungs – ESI – SEI –No
    Scapegrace – ILI –ILI – Yes
    Derpface – ESI - SEI - No
    Galen - IEE - ILE -No

    So far the test results are very promising. Please, check the test out on you friends and relatives, if it works as good as on socionists and let me know
    School of Associative socionics: http://socionics4you.com/

  18. #18
    Olga's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    1,596
    Mentioned
    36 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Galen View Post
    I got ILE
    Not bad at all! Thank you. I added your result into the statistics. By the first look I thought it was LIE instead of ILE. I think I need to have a break and have a kit-kat.))
    School of Associative socionics: http://socionics4you.com/

  19. #19
    Moderator Reficulris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    2,041
    Mentioned
    188 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    IEI

  20. #20
    Olga's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    1,596
    Mentioned
    36 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Reficulris View Post
    IEI
    Hi, Reficulris. Do you agree with the result or not? What is your type?
    School of Associative socionics: http://socionics4you.com/

  21. #21
    Moderator Reficulris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    2,041
    Mentioned
    188 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Olga View Post
    Hi, Reficulris. Do you agree with the result or not? What is your type?
    not sure yet. However, IEI is the result most test yield for me.

  22. #22
    Local Hero Saberstorm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Isle of Man
    TIM
    Robespierre
    Posts
    2,064
    Mentioned
    56 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I got ILI once, ILI twice and then IEI.
     
    God is most glorified when we are most satisfied in Him.
    - John Piper


    Socionics -
    the16types.info

  23. #23
    dugga dugga dun Narc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    TIM
    Ni-ENTj 8w9 sx/sp
    Posts
    1,288
    Mentioned
    101 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Olga View Post
    I have prepared the statisitcs of your results. Please, check it out and correct me, if I am wrong:

    Ragnar –ILI –SEI –ILI-ILI – Yes
    Kim – IEE –IEE – Yes
    Shayley – IEE –IEE-IEE-LII – Yes
    Roro – ILI –ILI – Yes
    Narc – LIE –LII – No
    Lungs – ESI – SEI –No
    Scapegrace – ILI –ILI – Yes
    Derpface – ESI - SEI - No
    Galen - IEE - ILE -No

    So far the test results are very promising. Please, check the test out on you friends and relatives, if it works as good as on socionists and let me know
    Mine was ILI, not LII.

  24. #24
    Mermaid with Stellar views SyrupDeGem's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    All about dat heart, no trouble.
    TIM
    IEE
    Posts
    1,472
    Mentioned
    87 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    My test result was IEE

    YOUR TYPE IS: INTUITIVE ETHICAL EXTRAVERT
    Huxley. IEE are naturally psychologists. They are able to build an opinion about a person very quickly and correctly. IEE enjoy helping people to expand their talents and encourage people to the self-growth and personal development. IEE have very good interpersonal skills and are able to find the individual approach to very different people. IEE are easily distracted, spontaneous,often have a spur-of-a-moment ideas. Their interests are broad and always changing being their life force. They looking for new experiences and wish to be in a new kind of situations and to be inspired by the new concepts. IEE see the multiple potential outcomes of a given situation and are able to hold them all in their head at the same time in order to see the essence of a situation. They see the hidden opportunities and can quickly find the way out of the problematic situation. While talking they often switch from one point to another ignoring the structure. IEE have a strong sense of morals and though they generally try to avoid a conflict, they would stand up for their opinion if their moral principals were confronted

    I'm a little surprised though as there were several questions i was unsure about. The pink/green and red/green combos I felt repelled by even though green is my favourite colour.

    The cluster questions relating to prospective employment roles could be more clearly defined... they are a touch confusing to read in English.

    That's my tuppence worth.

    Now this is a story all about how, my type got changed, turned upside down. Just wait for a minute and watch chatbox right there, & I'll tell how Gem became the moderator with blue hair.

    In typology central friended and praised, on the picture thread was where she spent most her days. Chilling out, selfies, relaxing all cool, And all typing some people and getting them schooled.

    When a couple of girls who were up to no good, Started annoying her & her friends in the forumhood, She got in one little flame war & got pissed off & said 'I'm moving in with that exboyfriend in the forum with the socionics toffs.

    So Gem pulls up to the forum for a year without being a hater, And yells to typocentral 'Yo creeps! Smell Ya later', Became a mod in her kingdom she was finally there, To sit on her throne as the mod with blue hair.

    InvisibruJim

  25. #25
    InvisibleJim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Si vis pacem
    TIM
    para bellum
    Posts
    4,832
    Mentioned
    202 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Your type is: Intuitive Logic Introvert
    Balzac. ILI have the ability to abstract and philosophical thinking, noticing contradictions in conclusions and pointing them to others (critics). There is always logical reasoning behind their conclusions. ILI are able to see the ways to get the profit, often they do not take the opportunity. They are naturally sceptical and can pour the cold water on someone whom they believe to be overenthusiastic. ILI are often sceptical about themselves and their own potential too. They appear to be shy, reserved and unenthusiastic

    InvisibleJim - ILI -Yes

  26. #26
    DaftPunk's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Alps
    TIM
    SiTe 6w5 sp/so
    Posts
    730
    Mentioned
    28 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    1. IEI
    2. SLI
    3. SLI

    SLI tend switch easily the topic of conversation and start talking about things without any obvious connection with the previous topic.

    This is very characteristic for me.

    Might be that I missclicked during the first test because even though I am unsure of my typ i never considered Fe-Ego types.

  27. #27
    A dusty and dreadful charade. Scapegrace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    TIM
    ill
    Posts
    3,055
    Mentioned
    169 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I took it again and got ILI once more.

    Boring. I suppose it's "correct."
    Last edited by Scapegrace; 09-16-2013 at 06:51 AM.
    "[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan

    Brought to you by socionix.com

  28. #28
    Olga's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    1,596
    Mentioned
    36 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Scapegrace View Post
    I took it again and got ILI once more.

    Boring. I suppose it's "correct."
    The next tests will be more fun - promise!
    School of Associative socionics: http://socionics4you.com/

  29. #29
    Olga's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    1,596
    Mentioned
    36 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Daft21 View Post
    1. IEI
    2. SLI
    3. SLI

    SLI tend switch easily the topic of conversation and start talking about things without any obvious connection with the previous topic.

    This is very characteristic for me.

    Might be that I missclicked during the first test because even though I am unsure of my typ i never considered Fe-Ego types.
    To a certain degree it is characteristic to all sensing types because they live in the world here and now and attention is directed to immediate stimuli in the environment. And may be more suits to LSE and SLI. My mum LSE often started the sentence and says something from the middle of topic and I wonder what is she talking about and what does it mean, relate to?
    It could be related to Ti in the vital block, the luck of thought structure.
    Is the result of SLI consistent with the results of other tests and what type fits better for you SLI or LSI?
    Your results show strong preference towards Superid - type of energy which is irrational introversion.
    School of Associative socionics: http://socionics4you.com/

  30. #30
    Olga's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    1,596
    Mentioned
    36 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Geminatronix View Post
    My test result was IEE
    I'm a little surprised though as there were several questions i was unsure about. The pink/green and red/green combos I felt repelled by even though green is my favourite colour.

    The cluster questions relating to prospective employment roles could be more clearly defined... they are a touch confusing to read in English.

    That's my tuppence worth.
    Hi, Geminatronix!
    I assume from your post that the result is right for you and consistent with other test results. What are you surprised about- that the test did show the right result even though you were unsure about some answers and choice of colours? I wish to think that test is robust and the concept is true and the presentation is simple for all to understand and make choice.
    In case of wrong result the test shows a shift of preference which could happen because the person consciously choosing what he likes. The person knows his type well and what to choose to be right but wish to test the test and show the preference for something else. Cheating the test. This is not a rare case when socionists do the test.

    It would be interesting to check out the test for not socionists and compare with the results of another popular verbal test.

    If you have been repelled by combo of green with red or pink that could mean that irrationality is stronger that statics or extraversion in your psychodynamics. The next test is called the pattern test will check psychodynamics profile and we shall see if this hypothesis about you is right.

    I agree that the wording in the test about the job could be improved. I am open to suggestions to anybody, please, write here or in private messaging the ideas how to improve it and I will be thankful for any help. ))
    School of Associative socionics: http://socionics4you.com/

  31. #31
    Olga's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    1,596
    Mentioned
    36 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Saberstorm View Post
    I got ILI once, ILI twice and then IEI.
    Love your signature - local hero!
    Not sure what is going on, it looks like you show strong preference to TPE Superid and irrational introversion. If we assume that the test is wrong and your type is LII, then what you get is a subtype ILI. As regards to psychodynamic profile that means that introversion is stronger compared to statics and rationality. What do you think about it? Is the result ILI consistent with the results of other tests? What do you usually get on tests?
    And yes, your appearance is consistent with LII more in my opinion!
    School of Associative socionics: http://socionics4you.com/

  32. #32
    Olga's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    1,596
    Mentioned
    36 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Dear all,

    The results of the test are promising! The difference from the original type is nearly always by the shift in TPE-group only.
    People chose Jung functions nearly always right.
    Half or more than half of the people show the right result!!!!!


    Test statistics has been moved to the English speaking forum.

    http://socionics4you.com/smforum/ind...63.html#msg763

    Please, feel free to post here your result:

    Number, name, original type (put ? if unsure); the results of the test (up to three results); Yes (consistent with the original type and/or he other tests results); No (not true and/or not consistent with the results of other tests)
    School of Associative socionics: http://socionics4you.com/

  33. #33
    squirreltual's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLI 9 sp/sx
    Posts
    809
    Mentioned
    33 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    I was trying to answer as honestly as possible and got LSE, LIE, then LSE. It obviously works for others so I'm probably just trying to be a snowflake/suck at tests.

  34. #34
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    18,006
    Mentioned
    162 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by squirreltual View Post
    I was trying to answer as honestly as possible and got LSE, LIE, then LSE. It obviously works for others so I'm probably just trying to be a snowflake/suck at tests.
    Tests are going to give you a finished product any time, any place, and like Olga wrote before, as long you answer honestly, you're going to get what you came for. No tests are crap - it's the human error that craps them. Something I've seen on this site way too many times.

  35. #35
    squirreltual's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLI 9 sp/sx
    Posts
    809
    Mentioned
    33 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Absurd View Post
    Tests are going to give you a finished product any time, any place, and like Olga wrote before, as long you answer honestly, you're going to get what you came for. No tests are crap - it's the human error that craps them.
    That's what I was saying...

  36. #36
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    18,006
    Mentioned
    162 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by squirreltual View Post
    That's what I was saying...
    Exactly.

  37. #37
    squirreltual's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    UK
    TIM
    SLI 9 sp/sx
    Posts
    809
    Mentioned
    33 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Absurd View Post
    Exactly.
    I'm glad we had this chat.

  38. #38
    dugga dugga dun Narc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    TIM
    Ni-ENTj 8w9 sx/sp
    Posts
    1,288
    Mentioned
    101 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    dohQuote from: Absurd;972064

    Tests are going to give you a finished product any time, any place, and like Olga wrote before, as long you answer honestly, you're going to get what you came for. No tests are crap - it's the human error that craps them. Something I've seen on this site way too many times.

  39. #39
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    18,006
    Mentioned
    162 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by squirreltual View Post
    I'm glad we had this chat.
    No problem.

    Quote Originally Posted by Narc View Post
    dohQuote from: Absurd;972064

    Tests are going to give you a finished product any time, any place, and like Olga wrote before, as long you answer honestly, you're going to get what you came for. No tests are crap - it's the human error that craps them. Something I've seen on this site way too many times.
    LUL. Take several of them at the same time and track your scores, genius. If every single one is going to produce something else from the desired result you have floating in your 'head', then something is wrong.

    And I'm not saying you're lacking a strong sense of self at all...

    Lul @Gamma

  40. #40
    dugga dugga dun Narc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    TIM
    Ni-ENTj 8w9 sx/sp
    Posts
    1,288
    Mentioned
    101 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Absurd View Post
    No problem.



    LUL. Take several of them at the same time and track your scores, genius. If every single one is going to produce something else from the desired result you have floating in your 'head', then something is wrong.

    And I'm not saying you're lacking a strong sense of self at all...
    You're honestly not worth the keystrokes it takes to argue with. You'll still be just as stupid tomorrow as you were today.

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •