Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Integral type of wcw

  1. #1
    lump's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    TIM
    Fi/Te 641 sp/sx
    Posts
    12,618
    Mentioned
    632 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default Integral type of wcw






  2. #2
    lump's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    TIM
    Fi/Te 641 sp/sx
    Posts
    12,618
    Mentioned
    632 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    i wanna say Fe+Se = beta. but its so fucking campy maybe i'd rather go with alpha.

  3. #3
    ■■■■■■ Radio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    2,574
    Mentioned
    153 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    beta beta beta beta beta

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    18,006
    Mentioned
    162 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lungs View Post
    L.U.L.

  5. #5
    mikesilb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    198
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Here is an interesting tangential question: How does the integral type of WCW differ from the integral type of the WWE, and also the integral type of the WWF (pre-WWE)? (Feel free to include any other Pro Wrestling organizations as you wish).
    Mike
    Enneagram: 6w7 so/sx (Tritype: 6w7/9w1/2w3 or 6w7/9w1/3w2)

  6. #6
    Glorious Member mu4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Mind
    Posts
    7,966
    Mentioned
    568 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    WCW is Delta, like it's southern roots. It's more vaudeville camp than WWE which is more trashy Hollywood aesthetic. It's Ted Turner's bet to beat WWE in this business but he didn't care as much as he did about the Braves and Hawks.

    It's got some Alpha characteristics like a lot of Ted Turner's ventures, but it's day to day operations is delta-ish. WWE is beta, like it's owner Vince Mcmahon. Vince's whole wrestling gimmick was about attitude and raunchiness while WCW's focus was more on high flying acrobatic wrestlers.

    Goldberg, who was basically WCW's prize wrestler, is a former NFL player that pretty much exemplifies this focus on athleticism and technique vs Vince Mcmahon's wrestlers like Degeneration X, and Hart Foundation(They wore pink too..)

    I think the WCW's focus on athleticism and technique is a .

  7. #7
    lump's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    TIM
    Fi/Te 641 sp/sx
    Posts
    12,618
    Mentioned
    632 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    (i actually meant wwe but i didn't know the difference. i know people who watch wwe but not wcw. but w/e)

  8. #8
    ഗന᎕ᒹ ±ᗉᚔXᙂഗ woofwoofl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Southern Arizona
    TIM
    x s x p s p s x
    Posts
    1,906
    Mentioned
    226 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    From what I know of Pro Wrestling overall, I got a central point set at Si-ESxj. Loads of LSEs up in there anyhow, just off the top of my head without going too nuts, I'd put Hulk Hogan, Stone Cold, Triple H, DDP, Chris Benoit all at LSE, I can do Scott Hall at Se-SEE, The Rock at Ni-LIE, and after that, I'm out. Fuck; actually, Undertaker at Ti-LII makes a hell of a lot of sense too.

    On a probs less important note, the thing I caught in an interview from him was this pattern of identifying objects by a bunch of intangibles that I catch Judicious peeps doing a lot; internal statics of objects, a.k.a. Ne, with what felt like categorizations of those that I wanna attribute to Ti due to the manner they were done. The hearse he was in wasn't gonna run people the fuck over, it was there to symbolize death and himself as a bringer of death, and it'll, like, make him "The Undertaker" and shit. Fucking hell it's hard for me to describe these things. I catch the same thing in Nintendo games. I like the fuck out of Little Big Planet from what I played of it because I can take raw material and fit it into whatever shape and size I need to get shit done, not be hidebound by some category of "wheel" or "wall" like that, in which some concept is boiled down to a one word container, reality be damned. Like taking JPGs of JPGs of JPGs and expecting each runthrough of degradation to provide some greater sense of clarity with each compacting and distorting pass-through. I swear, from the other side of things, whatever I do probably looks like raw chaos.

    Hell I got more in my mind about this but I ain't got the words for my thoughts...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •