You haven't lived till you've eaten the raw intestines of your enemies. Sorry to burst your little world.
You haven't lived till you've eaten the raw intestines of your enemies. Sorry to burst your little world.
This guy was so cool. I salute the devil that was in this one!
“I tell you, freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people in — and the West in general — into an unbearable hell and a choking life. - Osama bin Laden
Together with ******?Originally Posted by Aquagraph
Everyone who kills helpless creatures in an uniform or orders the latter ones is a friend of mine.
“I tell you, freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people in — and the West in general — into an unbearable hell and a choking life. - Osama bin Laden
Hw do you handle the fact that Joshua Milton Blahyi commited his crimes without uniform? Does that make you said?
Broaden your definition of an uniform.
Killing is probably the best thing you can do with your clothes off.
“I tell you, freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people in — and the West in general — into an unbearable hell and a choking life. - Osama bin Laden
Do you believe he's actually reformed?
Of course he is, he's clearly wearing clothes in recent pictures.
But he's not going into combat in those pictures.
how do you know that? youre making a lot of assumptions here....
In that video there's a second when he looks at the reporter and I swear his belly is rumbling.
Idiot or troll-idiot. Which are you?
Both. Luckily, General Butt Naked didn't kill any gays (correct me if I'm wrong). Aquagraph would have to condemn him.
Bingo. I won't be fully sold on it till he hands himself over for punishment.
I am the son of a mother who lost 10 relatives in war. I am not a pathetic shit who bewonders Genocide commiters nor do I believe that war is evolution. If you had a brain you'd see the point that the countries who were the battelfield are always screwed e.g. 30 years war were german was screwed and france, england and spain took over the power in Europe because they participated partly and didn't have to blood for it. Or after the two WWs were the USA took over the leader role from ancient europe. And yes I also know that this can be seen as kind of evolution you cynical scum.
If we met IRL i'd show you that i can part ways with the Geneva Convention.
YOU ARE PATHETIC!
Ashton takes part in his own genocide project. Give him some time.
I'd prefer he'd start with his euthanasia project by starting with himself
Too late, he already did:
Anyway, knowing this forum is war, evolution I mean, I want to make some things clear. By no means whatsoever I advocate genocide nor evolution (lul) by genocide. War is slaughter, finding the most effective way of slaughtering your opponent I would say. Something General Butt Naked did not actually master. And knowing wars are socially engineered, he is just a pawn.
Although the point of this thread may be damn simple...
But it's just me and people may be of different opinion.
Last edited by Absurd; 06-30-2013 at 03:56 PM.
@Daft21 don't trust absurd to represent anyone's opinion. Even his own.
Derisive cynicism is the only maladie Ashton evidently present here.
I'm not really presenting my opinion. I just wrote that in case of war you would get slaughtered like a pig before you could say 'Socionics' no matter how many Geneva Conventions you would manage to pinpoint. You just can't argue with facts - of course you may try -, but I don't think you would be able to after your demise.
If you don't believe me, pop out in a territory during war, and then post on this forum.
No one can have their own opinion, Ashton. Only leading opinion is the one produced and people have to submit to it, so they won't be left out. And evolution isn't a process, definitely not an amoral one. It isn't linear, that is, it doesn't have a beginning nor end, so it can't be a process.
It's simply deals with adaptation of organism to their surroundings. Nothing amoral about it unless one views it from Christian perspective. It would be immoral as opposed to amoral, then.
You can look at me in my VI-Thread post a picture of you and we make a poll who'd win a fist fight.
You really think I am kidding about my mother? If yes you prove that you're a cynical scumbag
Edit: Maybe I am a stickler to rules, maybe I am to political correct and a square und wear a stick in my arse. You posted in a chat an internetpage to watch cut-open stomachs you're just sick get help.
Mortal Kombat.
I wonder whether there are humanists in Gamma quadra to give blood after war commenced...
Last edited by Absurd; 06-30-2013 at 06:13 PM.
wtf nobody's talking about his type at all
They are, you just need to look closer.
This made me feel sick when I read it. He should pay for his crimes. Especially since there is no devil in real life, the only thing he was possessed by is a sickness of the human mind. Some human-body organisms are broken, if this was a real "tribal" world, he would have been assassinated long ago. No amount of personal revelations about his actions he has in his heart can excuse the atrocities in the real world he commited. Justice is never fair, especially for the one who did a crime. He has given up his personal rights the moment his sick mind ate the heart of a child. Crimes against humanity my ass, this was crimes against nature. I am usually against the death penalty, but somehow rotting in a prison seems to good for some creatures.
I type him a fucked up Ip.
Are you calling Christians sick and Ip?
Nonetheless, he wasn't even Christian during his reign, only converted after he stopped.
The threat of punishment is there as a deterent, that someone gets their rocks off seing the perpetretor being punished is additional.
Hand flapping gives the type away...
I am not about to waste energy on a troll or someone who can pretend having been trolling afterwards. Name calling is a trap for him to stand up for what he said.
@Wacey I felt similarly, but less so after the watching the video. The depravity is less monumental and unbelievable (and therefore traumatizing) when the context is added to the picture. So I recommend watching it.
Duals.
Amen, brother. Christ works in mysterious ways.
"[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan
Brought to you by socionix.com
It is. How?
I really like this guy.
Jesus, he makes Kony look like a stand up guy in comparison. I'm going with Se-SLE as a wild guess.
“We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch
Ne-IEE
6w7 sp/sx
6w7-9w1-4w5
Impossibru. My sides are still splitting from that guy asking Ashton for a fist fight on teh internets. Weird, weird people.wtf nobody's talking about his type at all
I agree with allot of this
IMPOV i think he should be killed b/c of the major red lines he crossed ,the only thing that scares me here is when people start to rationalize around things like that and somehow think its fine ,this to me is where it gets real fucked up lol
Plus we have decades of people exploring human depravity /crimes against humanity. its kinda old D: ,Go read a book.
I Type him Se/Ni
actually like the guy
If a wild animal harms, maims or kills a member of your family, is it allowed to live? Is a bear who attacks campers allowed to keep going, perhaps to terrorize others again? Or a pack of wolves allowed to kill livestock? These animals are put to death, because they are harming people and potentially could harm again in the future. Right or wrong, that is how it is
Now imagine if a human being does the same thing as these animals, yet instead of reasons such as to feed his hunger, or to protect his children, he kills your family member to feed his inflated ego, to give himself a sense of power and control? Would it be acceptable to let him go?
Why should this man experience for one more moment of the joy of the sun on his skin? Or the gift of another breath? Because he has "forgiven" himself? (for there is no man with a beard in the sky keeping tabs on each person, writing down wrongs). If I steal your car, is it okay if I apologize to you and go on scot free? Of course not (although in a completely enlightened reality it might be okay if I steal your car and you say "that's okay, you are forgiven, but we do not live in that world). Now imagine if I killed your son, on purpose, to feed the needs of my own twisted ego? For ego really is at the heart of this. You would want some kind of retribution, and the law would favour your feelings. Like I said before, justice is not fair. I may have forgiven myself, even you may have forgiven me, but because my act was perpetrated by a human mind-ego, it must be punished. The fashion for punishment nowadays is deprivation of rights, such as the right of free movement. That is why people are locked away in prisons, they are being deprived of the right to free movement.
Years ago it was an "eye for an eye", but culture has come a long way from Hammurabi's code. In today's age, the law and law makers have decreed that the human mind-ego can be healed, and can pay back its "debt" to society and the wronged. Human beings are locked away, and the personalities are kept separate from the rest of society, maybe to heal, maybe to suffer, maybe to rot in limbo, maybe all of these.
Butt Naked is one of those twisted human-mind egos that is broken. The context, perhaps only as a form of "understanding his actions" (for example how he grew up and the trials he experienced as a young man, all of which formed the scene that he became a monster) is irrelevant, his ego-mind made a choice, and that choice was the wrong one according to the healthy human spirit.
He is now "backward rationalizing" and I am stealing that term from psychology, but I think it applies. There isn't any being directing the movements of life anymore than there is power gained from eating a human heart, it is all superstition.
In regards to his drug use as an excuse, well in 1st world countries, society and the law have discovered that drug use is not a legitimate form of defense of murder, why should it be the case for this man? The answer is it should not.
In my country, the death penalty is not acceptable, law makers here believe it is better to let a murderer rot in a cell for the remainder of their life (and not even that long because of appeals and mandatory sentences).
But I ask, if we put a defected animal to death, why then do we allow a defected human being to live out their natural life?
I still think this guy is Fe/Ni, or Ni/Fe with suggestive Se. His need for outside validation from magical beings (that in fact come from himself) seems like Ni base or creative. and his search for power as Se suggestive, or somewhere tucked away in his super-id. I think the ESTp seems too obvious a choice.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
