You know you watch too much Supernatural when... eh, nevermind.
I suck at vi but would consider Gamma.
what do you mean with to much supernatural?Originally Posted by malna
Mercy me, don't make me embarrass myself any further.
i will. But i still don't get it to be honest.
Ummm. XNXj... at a guess.
Edit: What is the reason you do not want the pictures quoting? I have seen a few people ask this and i don't understand...genuinely curious.
Now this is a story all about how, my type got changed, turned upside down. Just wait for a minute and watch chatbox right there, & I'll tell how Gem became the moderator with blue hair.
In typology central friended and praised, on the picture thread was where she spent most her days. Chilling out, selfies, relaxing all cool, And all typing some people and getting them schooled.
When a couple of girls who were up to no good, Started annoying her & her friends in the forumhood, She got in one little flame war & got pissed off & said 'I'm moving in with that exboyfriend in the forum with the socionics toffs.
So Gem pulls up to the forum for a year without being a hater, And yells to typocentral 'Yo creeps! Smell Ya later', Became a mod in her kingdom she was finally there, To sit on her throne as the mod with blue hair.
InvisibruJim
When they aren't quoted you can erase the if you want to. Thats the reason people do that probably
When i started with socionics i thought i am gamma nowadays i am leaning more towards delta. But by reading more about decisive (se/ni) and judicious (si/ne) i think i might be decisive even though i tend to be lazy. At work i like to finish things before i do something new and the days before tests i am very mobilized thinking all the time at the exams. I also don't feel comfortable before a not unimportant decision and can relax better after the decision is made.
Smoking kills - throw those cigs my way.
lol
All of my irl friends have black squiggle faces too.
Still ESTj or ISTp
I need a better picture of you taken from the side and shoulder up
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
He is a handsome dude. There are some EIIs here that always make handsome dudes LSEs. I do not know who does that, but somebody does.
However, I guess he could be the Si-LSE. I have no arguments against it.
Socionics -
the16types.info
Oh yeah? I was reconsidering your type too! I think you're LSE
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
EIE-Ni
Then i appreciate it a lot that you also respect their privacy
That picture is tho most natural I found. It is also from the side. Normally i always feel tense and don't like it to much when people take picture of me. It's not because of privacy I just tend to feel akward
foto7.jpg
SLI confirm
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I am just curious. But why did this picture made you decide sli over lse?
LSE yesterday.
SLI today (and no word about the switch).
Weird
I was always leaning more towards Si because you kept saying lazy but um, yeah, I've seen only one extremely Si LSE in my life that was slightly lazy, so I was holding out for another lol.
Yeah, the picture clearly indicates SLI over LSE; you can look at the LSE profile shots if you want in the Filatova portraits
I'm just better at VI.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
About the laziness many friends wouldn't agree that i am lazy but i think it's only because they are unbelieveble lazy
The reason why i think i am a J and not a P is because I judge information immediately when it's incomming. E.g. Reading a longer Article in a magazine or newspaper i actually all the time judging every section and therefore i am changing my opinion about the article all the time.
I also might be extroverted seeing nobody during a day is hurtfull for me. In groupconversations i am normally one of the most talkatives as long the subject is at least half-interesting. And the smaller the group gets the more likely i influence the subjects that are talked about.
Fe-Role would also fit. I can give an example. We were 5 people playing a quiz game. The atmosphere was lighthearted and funny. A girl had to say a insect that beginns with the letter T and she said tick i invented and didn't want to give her the point because a tick is an arachnoid and not an insect. I know I can be an incurable smart-aleck
Edit: And your right my face expression seems to be more similarto the SLIs compared with the LSEs. For me VI is anyway something i probably never get.
Last edited by DaftPunk; 06-06-2013 at 04:30 PM.
I think i may have a side shot for the vi-ing... must remember not to be offended. Meow
EDit: Attachment 2011
Last edited by SyrupDeGem; 06-06-2013 at 04:39 PM.
Now this is a story all about how, my type got changed, turned upside down. Just wait for a minute and watch chatbox right there, & I'll tell how Gem became the moderator with blue hair.
In typology central friended and praised, on the picture thread was where she spent most her days. Chilling out, selfies, relaxing all cool, And all typing some people and getting them schooled.
When a couple of girls who were up to no good, Started annoying her & her friends in the forumhood, She got in one little flame war & got pissed off & said 'I'm moving in with that exboyfriend in the forum with the socionics toffs.
So Gem pulls up to the forum for a year without being a hater, And yells to typocentral 'Yo creeps! Smell Ya later', Became a mod in her kingdom she was finally there, To sit on her throne as the mod with blue hair.
InvisibruJim
how does this photo of a forum ENFp (your supposed dual) make you feel,OP? so close yet so far..
She looks symphatic. But i don't think that duals are attracted to each other by their looks. E.g. A EIE could look very hot and desirable for me.
And if you were LSI an IEE would look hot and desirable to you. Cool.
for you not?
Never really been attracted to EIE on this forum. Blah.
I am not talking about the forum
Hmm, I don't think I even met one to begin with. Maybe I did and forgot about it. I don't know about you - you can have some kind of fatal attraction to them.
Yeah kind of blackwidow like
Anyway IRL i suck at typing people. I fail even to type my closest familymembers and friends. Most of the time i can only nail down one dichotomie Se / Ni vs Si / Ne or Ti / Fe vs Te / Fi.
Introverts can be social, love people and miss being around them.About the laziness many friends wouldn't agree that i am lazy but i think it's only because they are unbelieveble lazy
The reason why i think i am a J and not a P is because I judge information immediately when it's incomming. E.g. Reading a longer Article in a magazine or newspaper i actually all the time judging every section and therefore i am changing my opinion about the article all the time.
I also might be extroverted seeing nobody during a day is hurtfull for me. In groupconversations i am normally one of the most talkatives as long the subject is at least half-interesting. And the smaller the group gets the more likely i influence the subjects that are talked about.
Fe-Role would also fit. I can give an example. We were 5 people playing a quiz game. The atmosphere was lighthearted and funny. A girl had to say a insect that beginns with the letter T and she said tick i invented and didn't want to give her the point because a tick is an arachnoid and not an insect. I know I can be an incurable smart-aleck
Edit: And your right my face expression seems to be more similarto the SLIs compared with the LSEs. For me VI is anyway something i probably never get.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
@Maritsa and what do you say to the stuff i wrote about judging and perceiving?
You said "The reason why i think i am a J and not a P is because I judge information immediately when it's incomming. E.g. Reading a longer Article in a magazine or newspaper i actually all the time judging every section and therefore i am changing my opinion about the article all the time."
That isn't really a product of rationality or irrationality or j/p; anyone can be critical and judgmental of information as it comes in contact with their personal values. My SLI ex was one of the most critical people of women who were not "pure" who were not "virgins" and who slept with many men and didn't commit to a relationship, that didn't make him a j type.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Didn't not make him a p type either; amirite?
right.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
My problem at the moment is that i don't truly understand whator
more. I am not in general a harmony seeking person and would say that i can handle disputes and arguments better than others. My father even told me i should go into politics. So i am aware of
but I am not sure if i value it.
I have kind of a ego/id problem. I don't think my PoLR is an intuitive one but eitheror
leaning more towards :fe: though
From group behaviour and descriptions i identify most with gamma but don't see myself neither as NT nor SF
watch out for interpretations...My problem at the moment is that i don't truly understand what
I have kind of a ego/id problem.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Yes but only easy to read stuff like uncomfortableness.watch out for interpretations...
Please send your skull measurements to thedrphillshow@gmail.com.
"[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan
Brought to you by socionix.com
It's been a hard night's day so let me just profess my eternal love for you right off of the bat.
And Daft, I still think you're Gamma, although I have nothing to prove that except for much telling tingling in my left elbow which I've come to recognize as an infallible sign.
I call myself batyote and I fight crime at night.
You look very adorable a shame you life so far away
On which gamma type did you think NT or SF?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote