Originally Posted by Name13
Last edited by mu4; 05-31-2013 at 10:23 PM. Reason: Troll, derogatory, flame, etc
My name is not troll, hkkmr. But thanks.
Well okay then
Yeah, I'm definitely LSE.
Yes, I would say that according to the way in which you've differentiated yourself from SLI description above, you're most likely an LSE. I care about my relations a lot that is kind of a dual or asymmetric effect.
I'm still kind of having trouble reconciling the last one you've picked; that is that you don't pay attention to your surroundings.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
you have no exact type
what do you mean?
I think it's because I'm almost always focused on my agenda(s). A lot of the time, I'm busy thinking about the goals I want to achieve so I don't really look around and perceive what's going on around me.
Currently, I do believe in being polite because I want people to be polite to me (my personal experience with disrespectful people makes me appreciate it more). I value politeness so I try to be polite but it has nothing to do with people.
He says that because he doesn't think anyone has an exact type
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
InterestingHe says that because he doesn't think anyone has an exact type
Looks familiar. It looks like you are indeed my identical.
I don't hate politics, though. In the words of Tarquin, "The wicked empire exists." Corruption is good because it makes for a better story. If you have a lame villain, your hero can't be very heroic.
Yes. Thinker, extrovert, Fi-seeking, list-making; ignore the boss there. You are Te, not Fe. And going by FDG, the LIE doesn't think you're one of them. So welcome, third genuine LSE.
It just occurred to me you're probably female.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Thanks! That's a funny but odd comic. The struggle against corruption can be very frustrating though.
Do many people mistype as LSE on this site?
I am.
Some do. The only one who's currently active and insistent on his mistyping is the ESE Mountain Dew/Snaps/William/whoeverheisnow.
I don't recall a female ever mistyping themselves as LSE; probably because it's a masculine type.
No. People just want to stay away from being typed as LSE because they think that LSE are cold automatons when they are really cold and heartless instead.
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 07-21-2013 at 08:15 PM.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
NobleFool.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
^ She likes to type guys as LSE. It's like a butterfly collector who wants to collect moths too, but doesn't want to admit to it, and so labels moths and butterflies alike to be butterflies. (Moths are easier to catch.)
this person is a girl.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Why? (I'm curious)
I guess that makes sense.
And you got her type right, too. Congratulations. Is this the first time you've typed a female LSE? I still don't know whether you still think I'm SEE; you seem to keep avoiding the topic.
Considering the order, I'm assuming you asked why in regards to Snaps. Maybe he's under the impression that LSEs are smarter than ESEs and since he has a brain he must be the former. But you'd have to ask him.
I'm not sure what the difference is, but I like the related stereotype. Emotions would totally ruin our rep.
I VMed him.
I'm rather emotionally expressive myself when I'm not trying to get something done or just having fun with friends. Otherwise, I've been called very serious and business-like.
I'm not this structured. I just want to be. SEE ftw
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
