I'm new to socionics and I'm very interested in how you here would place me in a visual identification.
http://oi48.tinypic.com/kdq3hd.jpg
http://oi48.tinypic.com/21dolnc.jpg
http://oi49.tinypic.com/w16614.jpg
http://oi47.tinypic.com/2h5inow.jpg
I'm new to socionics and I'm very interested in how you here would place me in a visual identification.
http://oi48.tinypic.com/kdq3hd.jpg
http://oi48.tinypic.com/21dolnc.jpg
http://oi49.tinypic.com/w16614.jpg
http://oi47.tinypic.com/2h5inow.jpg
my best guess is NT
I think lunarpine is trying to say that true kvlt black metal betrayed you.
Now I'm curious what you think VI is and what it's capable of producing.
Ah, so you're into dick-pulling and "fun". Count me out.
Don't pull korpsey by his cock, he might decay.
Check this fascinating article: http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...8-Temperaments
Based on your pictures I would say your eyes look "blurry" which might indicate that you have N preference
I went with T because you don't look very, in lack of a better word, cuddly
I also noticed "Livets ändhållsplats" on your T-shirt, which makes me guess you're swedish
Cool, according to that I'm a mix between IP and EP.
Ok thanks for giving an explanation. I think it depends though, my face is expressive but pictures doesn't capture that, or I just want to be cool enough to not smile in pictures.
I actually am from the frozen wasteland, yes.
Yes, there is type-analytic utility in looking at pictures and making inferences about their contents. I hold that this form of evidence and its evaluation should be considered among others such as writing samples, observations of social interactions, attribution style, personal idiosyncrasies, etc. etc. etc. However, if you like to watch people play Pin the Tail on the Donkey, asking them to type solely by VI is a hot ticket.
LSE ???
I'm interested in knowing what brought you to Socionics.
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 02-02-2013 at 02:55 AM.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I can type you without VI if you'd like, based on what you've said.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Congratulations, Maritsa thinks you're hot.
"[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan
Brought to you by socionix.com
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Let us keep in mind that I joined this forum in 2004. I am long past my socionical honeymoon phase, which lasted about three weeks. When I was fourteen.
First of all I don't think that "VI" is a terribly reliable method of "typing" someone. Are you also into phrenology? I think you can tell a very limited things about a person's nature through photographs. Especially in the self portraits people are so very fond of posting.
And from what he has written about himself? He has written 181 words with very little real content. At this point I wouldn't venture to "type" him at all. I have to accumulate facts about a person before I assume to "type" them.
I don't just haphazardly project upon them the personality I would like them to have.
"[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan
Brought to you by socionix.com
The things that stick out for me with regards to what he says is the way in which he says them. If you look closely to the first line.
"I'm new to socionics and I'm very interested in how you here would place me in a visual identification."
So I interpret that to mean he's interested in a process of things; that was easy right? He would be a process type.
Do you see that?
So, if you know the external concepts of Socionics, you can merge them all in like a laser.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
"[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan
Brought to you by socionix.com
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Are you aware that you are not explaining your process of deduction? Let me do it for you: "I think therefore it is." Well, Descartes was a stupid asshole who -- like you -- had a difficult time moderating his ideas and culling the good from the bad. He just vomited them all over volumes.
This is not about the fact that I am not open to exploring new ways of thinking. Methods different from my own. I read a shit ton too much philosophy for that to be plausible. I am extremely interested in how others think. Critical of it? Sometimes. Okay. Often.
My issue with you is that you cannot and will not critically examine your own thoughts beyond their first conception and that you form your opinions far too quickly for them to be reliable.
"[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan
Brought to you by socionix.com
Are you aware that you are not explaining your process of deduction? Let me do it for you: "I think therefore it is." Well, Descartes was a stupid asshole who -- like you -- had a difficult time moderating his ideas and culling the good from the bad. He just vomited them all over volumes.
Good job?
"[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan
Brought to you by socionix.com