Hello i'm Zcyd, my profession is the human psyche and thus my interest in socionics lies in it's rellability as an instrument to meassure personality and aptitude.
My interests tend to lie to me pretty offen, by hidding minor details in my mental processes that guide my behaviour. I also hide from commitments, except from those you should be able to chain some profit, in any manner (mental/physical).
My chain of thought is manipulated in such a way that I can take a peek through the backstage courtain and reflect on the implications of my actual uncertain approach. I'm certainly not so focused on how i'm saying things but rather what i'm saying; the content takes priority. I like to deepen into the meaning of a special approach that serves me well for personal purposes, while entretaining other possible interpretations that could draw plausible explanations for any kind of phenomena. I'm drawn to the ambiguous and look for explanations, less interested in the result, more in the path.
I belive in the world of objective truth that serves as a point of reference to asses the majority of situations. I also understand the implications of subjectivity, specially in the management of experience and belief.
If I could prioritize the importance of questions in a list I would say that the order: "what", "how", "why" is the most useful and efficient path to solve any problem. ("when and where" are both contained in those other three questions).
The "what" is linguistics, the "how" is science, the "why" is philosophy.