I need download ideas to read on my laptop for a week so that I dont die of boredom on a 1 week trip.
I dont read fiction, so, you know... science n shit, lol.
I need download ideas to read on my laptop for a week so that I dont die of boredom on a 1 week trip.
I dont read fiction, so, you know... science n shit, lol.
The Onion has a lot of fun articles that are also fun and sometimes factual.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
The Onion is entirely fiction as it is Satire on real news.
you're looking specifically for science books?
i wonder if you might like chuck klosterman. sex drugs & cocoa puffs. even the title is up your alley.
Fact.
Since no one else seems to have good suggestions, I suppose you might also want to try Edge online magazine
http://www.edge.org
I wish you would have asked earlier, hun; I would have mailed you their books; a lot of great inventive ideas -science meets future.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I meant Cracked.com, not the Onion.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Holy shit! @labster was right!
On a serious note, not really as the video addresses nothing that could be interpreted as an insult to you and I was just showing you how ridiculous the Onion can be though I can see how you would get that impression.
“We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch
Ne-IEE
6w7 sp/sx
6w7-9w1-4w5
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Get a website copier and download this site.
Ehhh...
Socionics...
God's Debris argues that the nature of omniscient but fractalized pantheist God. It's a dialogue between a curios courier and a divine entity.
Tao teh Ching is about Tao.
Book of Five Rings is about the art swordsmanship. It's written by Miyamoto Muramashi who was a Japanese swordsman and rōnin. His philosophy is easily interchangeable with the art of other crafts.
These books are good for the decreased attention span many struggle with when reading a non-physical book.
They have sculpted my spirituality but I'm not sure whether they are to your taste. All of them can be handily downloaded.
“I tell you, freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people in — and the West in general — into an unbearable hell and a choking life. - Osama bin Laden
Who in their right mind would read Tao Te Ching in modern times? Oh, Aquagraph.
It's like reading the art of duels from 1924...
i missed the "download" part. gogo reading comprehension. i dont know if you torrent and i don't usually look for books online so i'm not sure about that route. i second the tao te ching, that's easy to find online.
check these links. i think they're mostly fiction but maybe they'll have some nuggets of goodness.
http://www.planetebook.com/free-ebooks.asp#.UNfNW-Q70Z4
http://www.bachelorsdegreeonline.com...-for-download/
http://www.tenant.net/Community/steal/steal.html
http://www.literaturepage.com/
http://www.deepleafproductions.com/wilsonlibrary/
Would like to know what each one of yous sees under Tao Te Ching, as in being explicit when it comes to what you have to say, that "person" went after Socrates and Descartes, completely demolishing them both. So, really, any one thinks Jadae is going to read that and bathe in it, it not being some kind of, another, trend on this site?
Oh well, might be useful in Jadae's reign on this site, in his philosophy corner...